Stop putting that on my screen!

Depends on where they're taking the series; if they make it like Skyrim in the sense of streamlining and taking away attributes and weapon degradation then I'll have a nerd rage..

Yea...the special system kinda makes fallout

So why are IGN and other gameing reviers all on about it then hmmmmmmm... so no lie.... oviously as always they release fallout in the fall or autumn its always been the same and its usually every 2 years so there... think about it

exactly i will probley jump for joy load up FO3 and shoot a load of bullets in the air till the gun breaks XD

You're talking about fallout 4 right? There is literally 2 sentences of info about it. Also there is no trend in the releases, as only 2 been released. If there was a trend then this one will come out 3 years from fallout NV, and fo5 will come out 7 years after that.

Announcement: I wouldn't be able to sleep for a couple days. :banghead:
On release: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGmCaAEDxDU (just insert Fallout 4 instead of N64)

Guy playing a good old joke. I hope you know that's fake.

Especially when it used crappy in game graphics to pass off a Bos helmet with.

No i mean actually think about it they started FO3 develepment in 06 got released in 08 then new vegas develepment was started... same with all the elderscrolls game.. you just have to put logic into it.... even if its not in SF id like to see FO in a different country say england and in the city of London XD

I really wish people would stop asking for this. Take a game based around the 50's in America and push it somewhere else? :huh: Fallout is America!! Jeezlepeets.

I agree, but I would at least like a DLC set in Canada. In all of my Fallout playing experience(which consists of 3 and New Vegas) the US, Canada and China are the only three countries mentioned more then once.

Canada is mentioned in every Fallout

Now that I think about it, Canada just might be mentioned more then China.

I would love a Fallout DLC set in Canada, especially Alberta or Saskatchewan now that'd be some exciting scenery! Seriously though I would love to see Alberta, because that's where everyone in my family was born (I do mean my entire family, my dad, my mom, my brother, my sister) all except me because I was born a few weeks early. :c

As long as Bethesda aren't making it, i'll be quite happy.

I'd just sit there grinning and then get really impatient about it's release

As long as Bethesda makes it (oh yes), i'll be quite excited. Bethesda for me, makes the best games out there, in terms of value for money nowadays. They are vast, detailed, with great replayability value even with their flaws. Also they are the perfect "canvas" for a modder to modify. I trust that they will patch previous flaws and make a great game.

Also i would like FO4 to be post-acocalyptic 100%. Meaning that i don't want society to progress or them placing it 300-400 years after the war. The more post-apocalyptic the better. This is what Fallout series is about.

NO!
Fallout is about prgress, if you think its not than you clearly have no idea about the originals or their meaning.

Well, so you're basically asking for a prequel ? Sure, would be fun. Sometime in the future.

Going back to the topic question I won't surprise anybody - depends on who makes it. Now, to not sound like I'm some kind of hater - just like Obsidian's approach to Fallout better, as it's, well, made of their own flesh
If Beth makes it I'll be :fallout: but if Obisidan makes it, I'll be :vaultboy: :foodndrink: :fallout: :foodndrink: :vaultboy:

But then again, Beth certainly considered all the criticism from classic Fallout fans and can avoid a faux pas this time, they can also have Obsidian cooperating on story writting.

I'll give up smoking :thumbsup:

Right......... So you want a, say, fallout 4, 300-400 years after the nuclear war with no too much radiation and people easily protected by it, technological advancement, not chaotic (it will obviously be more orderly), with the effects of the nuclear bombing wearing off.

Fallout is about progress? Heh not a chance. It is about survival in a chaotic and hostile world which lost its foundations, its stability, its ethics, its resources... The war was a huge step-back, it almost destroyed all traces of civilization and left only ghosts of that past reminding the survivors of how fragile their world was. The progress you are talking about is more like survival and an attempt for humankind to stand on its feet and put the pieces back together. I wouldn't call that progress

anyway what you don't understand is that if progress is actually made then it will not be fallout anymore.



Not necessarily a prequel. I just want Fallout to stay Fallout. Not become Mass effect.....................
Yes if they cooperate and each one handles the parts they are good at, it will be the best scenario.

Sadly he's not alone in not knowing anything about Fallout.




Fallout takes place 84 years after the great war, and it has little to no radiation and people have progressed alot. I don't want Fallout jumping ahead anymore, but I don't want it going back, with zero progress.




So you played Fallout 3 and now you know everything there is about Fallout? Fallout is about progress. If you played Fallout, Fallout 2, Tactics and New Vegas you would know that. The Great war in Fallout and Fallout 2, is just the past. Factions rebuilt, they come into conflict with one another. We as the player, find ourselves, in the middle of it. Through our actions, we decided how the wasteland is shaped. "War, war never changes." The factions have rebuilt to the point they are no longer in a choatic need for survival. Only Fallout 3 was a huge step back in Fallout. It is set 200 years after the great war, yet looks like it happened yesterday. Zero progress made in that time.

Humanity rebuilding is the point of Fallout. Again "War, war never changes." Not wallowing in a radioactive craphole for 200 years.

Actually yes Fallout is about progress, not chaos and radiation like you seem to think.

I do not want Fallout to be 300 years after the war and orderly but I do not want them to basically say "Its been anarchy for two centuries" again.

I have an interesting take on a Fallout game where a war between two powerful factions has torn apart an entire region, making things anarchic with raider gangs common and fights between both sides even more common.

My idea for a Fallout game would have that part of the world in ruins from post-war events.

And there was a lot of progress in F1 and F2, the NCR was established, two threats that would wipe out mankind where stopped and nobody was just scrapping by through scavenging, they were just scrapping by through working for the richer people.

Funny that people call old school guys (dinosaurs) such as myself. Arrogant, elitist and stuck in the past. To me it is by far more arrogant and elitist for someone to come into a series on the fouth instalment and completely ignore all those that came before it. To say that it was the best of the series. Then when the fifth comes out, they say it svcks because it wasn't like the fourth. When those that know the series well, have played all the games try to explain weakness in the fourth instalment. Get bashed as arrogant elitists stuck in the past. Those that play that card are the arrogant elitists, unwilling to learn from the past.

End of little rant.

I think that the next one should be in the 2290's. Then afterwards less than a decade each time. Eventually they will have to stop the series, restart, or jump ahead a fair amount of time.

Also Bethesda said they will not go back in time for fallout.