How will you react when FO4 is announced?

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:59 pm

I think that the next one should be in the 2290's. Then afterwards less than a decade each time. Eventually they will have to stop the series, restart, or jump ahead a fair amount of time.

Also Bethesda said they will not go back in time for fallout.

2292 to be exact, that is 15 years from Fallout 3 and 300 years from the day I was born :rolleyes:
User avatar
Euan
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 3:34 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:27 pm

Actually yes Fallout is about progress, not chaos and radiation like you seem to think.

I do not want Fallout to be 300 years after the war and orderly but I do not want them to basically say "Its been anarchy for two centuries" again.

I have an interesting take on a Fallout game where a war between two powerful factions has torn apart an entire region, making things anarchic with raider gangs common and fights between both sides even more common.

My idea for a Fallout game would have that part of the world in ruins from post-war events.

And there was a lot of progress in F1 and F2, the NCR was established, two threats that would wipe out mankind where stopped and nobody was just scrapping by through scavenging, they were just scrapping by through working for the richer people.


Radiation and chaos? That's what you think that i think of Fallout? No sir, it's much more and it has a way deeper meaning than that! And instead of progress i see degeneration! Because i don't focus on the fact that humanity is in stage 1 and is just progressing. Humanity was progressed, a war happened, it was nearly destroyed and after that everyone was struggling for survival. Some tried to establish an orderly faction like NCR, some had more nefarious purposes like Enclave and the world was in total chaos and triying to stand back on its feet.
NCR was not perfect and not everyone was scrapping by through working for rich people and not everyone was under the wing of NCR more importantly.


Sadly he's not alone in not knowing anything about Fallout.

Fallout takes place 84 years after the great war, and it has little to no radiation and people have progressed alot. I don't want Fallout jumping ahead anymore, but I don't want it going back, with zero progress.

So you played Fallout 3 and now you know everything there is about Fallout? Fallout is about progress. If you played Fallout, Fallout 2, Tactics and New Vegas you would know that. The Great war in Fallout and Fallout 2, is just the past. Factions rebuilt, they come into conflict with one another. We as the player, find ourselves, in the middle of it. Through our actions, we decided how the wasteland is shaped. "War, war never changes." The factions have rebuilt to the point they are no longer in a choatic need for survival. Only Fallout 3 was a huge step back in Fallout. It is set 200 years after the great war, yet looks like it happened yesterday. Zero progress made in that time.

Humanity rebuilding is the point of Fallout. Again "War, war never changes." Not wallowing in a radioactive craphole for 200 years.


Wow!!

The reason i'm saying all these is actually because why i have played f1 and f2 and loved them more than any other!!
Seriously, where do you guys come from, saying that fallout is about progress?

I don't think that trying to put all the broken pieces back together can be called progress!
You use the "war never changes" line yet you don't seem to grasp its meaning. Sure Fallout is about progress, it's not about the consequences and horrors of war! It's not about human nature and the nature of war!

Yea.. you know what? We should forget a war even happened! We should ask for a world with no radiation, advanced technology, eclipsed war remains,no lack of resources and just have 2-3 factions fight over the "new world". Hell, let's turn Fallout into Red Dead Redemption or -even better- Mass effect! Yea that would be great! :facepalm:

Yea sadly i'm one of the people who don't want this to happen. Shame isn't it.
User avatar
Danny Warner
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:26 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:50 pm

Radiation and chaos? That's what you think that i think of Fallout? No sir, it's much more and it has a way deeper meaning than that! And instead of progress i see degeneration! Because i don't focus on the fact that humanity is in stage 1 and is just progressing. Humanity was progressed, a war happened, it was nearly destroyed and after that everyone was struggling for survival. Some tried to establish an orderly faction like NCR, some had more nefarious purposes like Enclave and the world was in total chaos and triying to stand back on its feet.
NCR was not perfect and not everyone was scrapping by through working for rich people and not everyone was under the wing of NCR more importantly.


Apologies, that's what you came across as.

And I mean its about progress as in the war sent civilization back to square one and they have been moving up since, there isn hardly any more radiation but they are progressing, they will eventually reach the point where they will be on par with and then beyond Pre-War civilization but not for a long time.

I want chaos but not everlasting chaos, I want chaos caused by post-war events.
User avatar
Louise Lowe
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:08 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:36 pm

It is about progress because the factions in Fallout and Fallout 2 aren't just trying to put together what was broken/destroyed in the great war. They are rebuilding, new things, forming new cultures, new ways of doing things.

They aren't trying to remake pre-war America, hell not even the Enclave in Fallout 2 were trying to do that.

The Factions are farming, mining, manufacturing and coming into conflict with one another. They aren't barely surviving on scraps of the old world, living day by day in a radioactive craphole.

Fallout 3, they have made zero progress, living in a radioactive craphole, banging rocks together, living in the past, barely surviving on scraps of the old world. If that is what you think the series is about, you are wrong.
User avatar
Lily Evans
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 11:10 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:51 pm

It is about progress because the factions in Fallout and Fallout 2 aren't just trying to put together what was broken/destroyed in the great war. They are rebuilding, new things, forming new cultures, new ways of doing things.

They aren't trying to remake pre-war America, hell not even the Enclave in Fallout 2 were trying to do that.

The Factions are farming, mining, manufacturing and coming into conflict with one another. They aren't barely surviving on scraps of the old world, living day by day in a radioactive craphole.

Fallout 3, they have made zero progress, living in a radioactive craphole, banging rocks together, living in the past, barely surviving on scraps of the old world. If that is what you think the series is about, you are wrong.


I already told you what Fallout is about. Feel free to disagree or ask for a Red Dead Redemption/Mass effect hybrid.

Sure Fallout is about progress, it's not about the consequences and horrors of war! It's not about human nature and the nature of war!

User avatar
Victor Oropeza
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 4:23 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:29 pm

I already told you what Fallout is about. Feel free to disagree or ask for a Red Dead Redemption/Mass effect hybrid.


:facepalm:

Never said it would be Red Dead Redemtion/Mass effect hybrid. Never in my time on this forum have I every wanted that.

"War, war never changes" means that the factions progress, rebuild and come into conflict with one another, end up going to war, destroy themselves and the cycle continues.

Someday in the Fallout Universe, it will end up with nations once again controlling the world, and once again fighting one another, which leads to another nuclear war. Read "A Canticle for Leibowitz."

Human nature, we build, we fight, we destroy ourselves. Fallout is about rebuiling and progress, but it is also about conflict, human nature.

I doubt Fallout as a series will ever end up as a game where there are nations controlling the world and really I don't want it to happen, but the games are the building up to that. They aren't about people doing nothing for 200 years, fighting over scraps.

Factions in Fallout and Fallout 2 are rebuilding with new materials, manufacturing new things, forming armies and farming. In short they are doing what humans do. They rebuild and thrive.

Edit: what I am getting at is that there has to be progress in Fallout 4. Farming, manufacturing, building with new materials and a real working ecenomic system. It would be stupid to once again have people living in radioactive craphole doing nothing.
User avatar
naomi
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:58 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:02 pm

So Fallout is going to become the Civilizations series?
User avatar
amhain
 
Posts: 3506
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:31 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:28 am

So Fallout is going to become the Civilizations series?


I said there will not be a Fallout civilization game. I said that what Fallout is, its the building up to it. Someday many hundreds if not thousands of years one day the Fallout universe will have rebuilt itself and then once again destroy itself.

Until then we are seeing what happens in America/North America till then.

To pretend that humans are happy living in radioactive craphole doing nothing for 200 years, eating 200 year old food, is stupid. Do you really think thats how people would want to live?

Again Fallout and Fallout 2, hell even Fallout Tactics has people, farming, manufacturing, working economic system, they aren't sitting around doing nothing for 200 years!
User avatar
Jaki Birch
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:16 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:48 pm

This thread has gotten far off topic, I think it's time for a lock.
User avatar
Jonathan Braz
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:29 pm

Previous

Return to Fallout Series Discussion