So as the title says i think Crysis 2 has become the next HAZE. For all of you who are unaware, HAZE was made by "Free Radical" another words Crytek (acquired in 2010). And was made as a PS3 exclusive. HAZE got a TON of hype and was very nice for the time it came out, looked a lot like Crysis one. Except for a Nano Suite you got shots known as nectar.

HAZE also had an online similar to Crysis 2 but after a few weeks the servers were empty. Crytek also abandoned HAZE because the HAZE community left. The reason the HAZE community left is that Crytek never released patches to fix the known SP bugs and MP bugs.

My point is I think Crysis 2 has become the new HAZE. Its only going to be popular for a few weeks before people stop playing due to lack of support for the game. And after they realize the games MP is empty they will abandon the game.

I understand Crysis is Crytek's baby, but it seems as though they are not willing to feed there baby. So far the first week of Crysis 2 is turning out exactly like the first week of HAZE did. The similarities are striking between HAZE and Crysis 2 in terms of release and lack of support.

I quickly getting converted from Proponent to opponent of this game, I mean this is getting to be a Joke. I have done my waiting, we were told we were getting a patch, now where the hell is it. These forums are going to end up just like the ones were at infinityward after MW2 was released, the PC community kept bickering over whether or not the game would have dedicated servers. Infinity Ward danced around the issue time and time again and finally after a petition of a few hundred thousand was sent to Activision it was told no dedicated server under any circumstances. What is it going to take to get some transparency here so that the community knows what is going on with the game. If all other threads about DX11 are simply rumor, then would someone at Crytek please give us a timeline or a definite yes or no answer if it will ever be implemented. This DX11 and patching issue is turning into a fiasco and the games multiplayer and community will be dead before May gets here if some serious talking/updating is not done soon.

Stupid post

Stupid post

says the guy who spends time putting 2 words in his.

At least Haze had a decent single player.

Dear God... the game's been out for less than 2 weeks you little baby. How fast do you think patches are made.

the game has been in development for 3 years. THERE SHOULD BE NO MAJOR PATCHES!

Dear God... the game's been out for less than 2 weeks you little baby. How fast do you think patches are made.

This is so funny, since when did people standard drop to : ' I buy a product but I can wait 2 months to actually enjoy it'.

Go get yourself a hamburger but wait 20 minutes to eat.

=> A game should work 100% when it is out. There can be little bugs yes but no major problems like no ani cheat, a lot and lot of bugs, no dx11 like said etc etc.

wow STOP!

The game was in dev for years yes, but remember that main cash income is from consoles, therefore we are left whith not so cool graphics because it was made for console

not pc->console
it was made console -> PC

Battlefield 3 is for pc's mostly and console users will be left behind a bit because of the console limits

back to the topic

I must disagree whit you
1# its weekend those guys have alife u know ;/
2# updates are maintained daily in workdays
3# if low life scum would not cheat we would not have this problem
4# take a chill pill

This game will be fixed in aprox 1 - 2 months because it takes time to do stuff

just you wait

Yeah the thread is stupid as the OP

Dear God... the game's been out for less than 2 weeks you little baby. How fast do you think patches are made.

This is so funny, since when did people standard drop to : ' I buy a product but I can wait 2 months to actually enjoy it'.

Go get yourself a hamburger but wait 20 minutes to eat.

=> A game should work 100% when it is out. There can be little bugs yes but no major problems like no ani cheat, a lot and lot of bugs, no dx11 like said etc etc.

+1

so true, its funny there is no other product on earth that people purchase and would except the kind of crap that is pulled by game devs

Would you except this kind of treatment from a car manufacturer !!! nope

would you except this kind of treatment from a clothing line !!! nope

think about it there is no other product that you buy, that the makers of the product pull this crap and where there is little or no recourse the consumer can take once they bought the product..


something is definetely wrong with this

wow STOP!

The game was in dev for years yes, but remember that main cash income is from consoles, therefore we are left whith not so cool graphics because it was made for console

not pc->console
it was made console -> PC

Battlefield 3 is for pc's mostly and console users will be left behind a bit because of the console limits

back to the topic

I must disagree whit you
1# its weekend those guys have alife u know ;/
2# updates are maintained daily in workdays
3# if low life scum would not cheat we would not have this problem
4# take a chill pill

This game will be fixed in aprox 1 - 2 months because it takes time to do stuff

just you wait

You are not understanding this. apparently you have VERY low standards. GOOD developers NEVER have problems like this on release. This is worse than the DEMO! a game in development for this long should NOT have these problems.

Yeah the thread is stupid as the OP

Explain yourself. So far EVERYTHING i have said in the original post is true.

Yeah the thread is stupid as the OP

Explain yourself. So far EVERYTHING i have said in the original post is true.

Sry! Can't talk with you. Afraid of being like you internet boy

Yeah the thread is stupid as the OP

Explain yourself. So far EVERYTHING i have said in the original post is true.

Sry! Can't talk with you. Afraid of being like you internet boy

kinda figured. your willing to say me and my OPINION are stupid yet you wont explain why? AND THEN, you wright a post in telling me you wont explain it to me when that time could have been used to explain why. THEN in your post you claim that you will be like me, an "internet boy" (as if that is a bad thing) if you explain why my post was stupid. yet you explain to me why you wont?

Your post is illogical and stupid.

Dear God... the game's been out for less than 2 weeks you little baby. How fast do you think patches are made.

This is so funny, since when did people standard drop to : ' I buy a product but I can wait 2 months to actually enjoy it'.

Go get yourself a hamburger but wait 20 minutes to eat.

=> A game should work 100% when it is out. There can be little bugs yes but no major problems like no ani cheat, a lot and lot of bugs, no dx11 like said etc etc.

Wow... what a friggen moron.

You are acting like the glitches turn this game from amazing to awful. The singleplayer is still great, and the multiplayer's only real problem right now is the rampant cheating (which I haven't even run into yet, BTW). The hamburger comparison makes no sense and is more comparable to preordering a game before it's released, and "work 100%" is the worst definition of a quality game I have ever seen. There's no such thing as a bug-free game.

he is referring to the MAJOR glitches that are 100% uncalled for in a game. things like major visual glitches, melee glitch, consistently falling through map, bad AI etc. and that the SP alone. THEN in MP you have easy access to hack the game, no anti cheat, profile not saving, consistent entering of CD key.

these problems should be non existence in a game.

No need to defend yourself, just ignore the idiots OP. You're on the internet, your not allowed to have an opinion because someone will always attack you over it. I made the same post as you on a different site and heard the same complaint that I should wait and I'm not "entitled." The problem is I am entitled, i paid them $60 for an experience I am clearly not getting. There is no excuse for the the flickering, cheating, save issues, dx 11 and so on. Games these days are made to be broke and fixed later to recoup issues. If it doesn't sell enough, they just move on and forget about it. It's ludicrous at best and humorous in a bad way at worst. I am very disappointed in Crytek and Crysis 2, I haven't enjoyed the game at all. The issues are inexcusable and ignoring them and adding anti-cheat support for a game that many still can't even play online is purely a slap in the face.

I don't like how everyone tells you to chill and wait and deal with it. I have standards and i paid for something and it should work like the box said it would. The worst is the blatant ignoring of the fanbase and customers. If Toyota ignored their customers when brakes failed, we would have a lot of deaths. Unfortunately some companies realize an issue and correct it, others choose to ignore it.

well this is also the crysis forum so i expect crysis fanboys.

Touche. Sad thing is the Crysis fanboys have forgotten how awesome Crysis was and how Crytek totally missed the mark with Crysis 2 in almost every way.

well this is also the crysis forum so i expect crysis fanboys.

Do you have ANY idea about games development?

I guess not.

Bugs and other issues go into a categorised list as either High, Medium or Low priority.

High priority bugs, such as texture flickering in SLI/Crossfire, are dealt with first as they impact on gameplay. Medium priority bugs, such as failure to retain the CD Key for online play, would have a workaround put in place while they are getting a fix in place. Low priority bugs, such as AI issues, will only be patched if they get around to it and may never be patched.

By your way of thinking Windows would be tested on every hardware configuration before launch so there are 0 bugs to patch. Why do you think Microsoft release Patches and Service Packs?

A good developer would consider all issues top priority and would try and get all of the issues fixed within the month of the game's release. The best developer would make sure the game works before it's released and fix any issues that only some computers get as all computers are different.

well this is also the crysis forum so i expect crysis fanboys.

Do you have ANY idea about games development?

I guess not.

Bugs and other issues go into a categorised list as either High, Medium or Low priority.

High priority bugs, such as texture flickering in SLI/Crossfire, are dealt with first as they impact on gameplay. Medium priority bugs, such as failure to retain the CD Key for online play, would have a workaround put in place while they are getting a fix in place. Low priority bugs, such as AI issues, will only be patched if they get around to it and may never be patched.

By your way of thinking Windows would be tested on every hardware configuration before launch so there are 0 bugs to patch. Why do you think Microsoft release Patches and Service Packs?

I dont need to be a game developer to understand this game has WAY to many problems to have been release. it is just like any other product, no product should ever be released unless it properly works.

well this is also the crysis forum so i expect crysis fanboys.

Do you have ANY idea about games development?

I guess not.

Bugs and other issues go into a categorised list as either High, Medium or Low priority.

High priority bugs, such as texture flickering in SLI/Crossfire, are dealt with first as they impact on gameplay. Medium priority bugs, such as failure to retain the CD Key for online play, would have a workaround put in place while they are getting a fix in place. Low priority bugs, such as AI issues, will only be patched if they get around to it and may never be patched.

By your way of thinking Windows would be tested on every hardware configuration before launch so there are 0 bugs to patch. Why do you think Microsoft release Patches and Service Packs?

I dont need to be a game developer to understand this game has WAY to many problems to have been release. it is just like any other product, no product should ever be released unless it properly works.

So Crysis 2 should have been perpetually in development, DNF style until all the bugs were dealt with?

So Crysis 2 should have been perpetually in development, DNF style until all the bugs were dealt with?

no i never said that. all the bugs that make the product stop working should be ironed out before release. all games have there bugs, but not all games have bugs so bad to were it makes the game unenjoyable or unplayable. i should have to worry about falling through a map, having the AI stop working, hackers in most of the matches, only few servers working. all these should have been dealt with before the release of the game.

Stupid post

says the guy who spends time putting 2 words in his.
Says the guy who made another stupid post.

So Crysis 2 should have been perpetually in development, DNF style until all the bugs were dealt with?

no i never said that. all the bugs that make the product stop working should be ironed out before release. all games have there bugs, but not all games have bugs so bad to were it makes the game unenjoyable or unplayable. i should have to worry about falling through a map, having the AI stop working, hackers in most of the matches, only few servers working. all these should have been dealt with before the release of the game.

You can bet that the majority of the problems you've brought up there are a high priority for Crytek to fix.

They have to test the game to see if it's a problem with certain hardware configurations, the SLI/Crossfire issue, or an actual issue with the game itself, the AI issues. This is the reason patches take time to be released.