This is where the problem lies. I am 100% in complete agreement with you that there should be alternatives. But you're wanting just one style, removing an option that several love, to suit yours and others individual styles.

Just because it's what I want, doesn't mean I won't be satisfied with anything else . If there is fast travel, OK, but put in what Morrowind had to. THEN I'd be able to ignore it and play my way. I think it would also be cool if there were a designated "hardcoe mode" with no OB-style fast travel.

I just had an idea:
The actual world out side of the cities should include either a Morrowind styled fast travel system or something else if there are any other ideas, but the cities should include a fast travelling system like Oblivion!

For example in Oblivion it was really getting annoying travelling back and forth from district to district a million times (Arena to Market, Mages Guild to Market/Arena, Talos District etc.), so what I thought, if everyone really does hate the fast travelling system, that btw I have no problem with (if you don't want fast travel just don't use it in game if it's included), let the outside world and the cities have different fast travel systems.

In a city you'll be maybe able to fast travel from district to district while out side of the city you'll have to rely on your legs, or on any means of transport like boats etc.

What do you think?

That's not inconvenience... That's how it should have been done from the beginning; and aside from requiring you to discover a location prior to traveling there (which I don't like), this is exactly how Fallout has always done it... until FO3

OB Fast Travel (FT) just needs random encounters, but really, it needs to be Red Dead Redemptions FT with random encounters.

People need to see the difference between FT and Traveling services, Traveling services are good for roleplay perspective, but FT doesn't need to be tied to them like in morrowind, I would rather want it like in Daggerfall then.

I'm still rather annoyed that the OP continues the same flawed arguments in the opening post for the third time, even though that they have been discredited. Inserting a passage telling you understand the difference, yet leaving in a passage which contradicts this directly, is not very convincing. Saying you understand that OB FT isn't teleporting doesn't mean that it's okay to keep calling it teleporting. The three prime factors that is supposed to discourage not using OB FT, are still not objectively valid and therefore still not qualified for use as sweeping qualifications.

Not utilizing Morrowind’s system to its full extent, is still not a proper argument because FT being tied to specific play styles creates a roleplay bias against playing characters that aren't using those play styles, and so goes against the whole argument of including traveling services for the sake of roleplay value. FT is a mechanic for the player not the character, and so should be available to the player regardless of what kind of character he plays. This is of course ignoring that mark/recall/intervention is still not actual FT but rather functions like FT as a side effect, hence the bias, when real FT is tied to traveling services.

Not just Role Play, for it to really work it should server both a decorative (roleplay) aspect, and a defined mechanical aspect simultaneously. FT (Foot Travel ~instead of Fast Travel) should be free and offer the most ease of choosing a destination, while paid transport offers popular routes and professional guards. The risk of ambush should be there for both, and commensurate to the level of defense; (a lone brigand won't rob a coach with three guards, but six brigands would). Paid magical transport allows for no ambush (unless the mage is in on it :chaos:), and gets you there in seconds, but costs an outrageous sum.

This is what i have come to as well. When I played marrowind the map was frustrating and hard to navigate. So I would say fast travel between cities with everything discovered highlighted on your map. However lacking this I would like the ability to turn off fast travel. If that doesn't happen oh well. i loved Oblivion and Fallout and they had fast travel.

I would rather have a settings table that I could toggle all this stuff on or off. I personally do not think that making game harder should change how the game works. Give me a menu with these options and I'm totally fine!

Sounds good, that way FT has a cost, but not in inconvenience. Sure getting ambushed could be considered an inconvenience, but battle is a major entertainment value with the games and FT is often used to avoid boring parts, so it kind of a win/win situation for anyone who's looking for a fight. When I FT it is often just to avoid the tedium of just watching my character walking, I wouldn't mind interupts, because they aren't wastes of time, and FT with an ambush is still faster than just walking And you can always just continue FT'ing after the battle.

Same with me.

Although a nifty idea, don't think they want to put toggles in for things like that.

My second suggestion is then to give me alternatives. I would like to have fast travel to major cities and settlements. However if the OB style is what remains in Skyrim. Oh well it is convenient.

OP has a wonderful idea, totally agree and hope a system for all players will be included. But honestly, at this point i'll settle for insta travel morrowind mages guild style from npcs.

I fully support giving players options to entirely bypass the Oblivion-styled fast travel, and I fully support the arguments that are being used to argue for alternates to fast travel.