Thank you for pointing that out! +1!

TF2 doesn't have customization beyond a few weapon choices and hats

Brink doesn't have a Red v Blue color scheme (and TF2 didn't invent to colors red and blue, nor was it the first game to use them)

Name another game besides Mirror's Edge that has parkour, Wolfenstein had guns so CoD ripped that off. Plus S.M.A.R.T. is a mode of transportation to add a 3rd dimension to the combat to the game and remove the annoyance of getting caught on a 5 inch high curb, not the main focus.

You also said that Brink had bad graphics, then implied that CoD's graphics weren't terrible and didn't have color palette consisting of grays and browns.

Also the point of the story wasn't to have both sides be evil/totalitarian/terrorists, it was to have them both have gray morality, so that the player could decide which was more in the wrong. But let's face it, this is a multiplayer game through-and-through, story isn't a focus. With that said the backstory is extraordinarily good.

Brink dosnt have a great story, multiplayer is very repetitive. and at least people talk on cod

On a side note doom was more popular and pretty much started user designed levels w3d did come first though

Brink dosnt have a great story, multiplayer is very repetitive. and at least people talk on cod

On a side note doom was more popular and pretty much started user designed levels w3d did come first though

TF2 doesn't have customization beyond a few weapon choices and hats

Brink doesn't have a Red v Blue color scheme (and TF2 didn't invent to colors red and blue, nor was it the first game to use them)

Name another game besides Mirror's Edge that has parkour, Wolfenstein had guns so CoD ripped that off. Plus S.M.A.R.T. is a mode of transportation to add a 3rd dimension to the combat to the game and remove the annoyance of getting caught on a 5 inch high curb, not the main focus.

You also said that Brink had bad graphics, then implied that CoD's graphics weren't terrible and didn't have color palette consisting of grays and browns.

Also the point of the story wasn't to have both sides be evil/totalitarian/terrorists, it was to have them both have gray morality, so that the player could decide which was more in the wrong. But let's face it, this is a multiplayer game through-and-through, story isn't a focus. With that said the backstory is extraordinarily good.

I am not going to dissect your whole post because a lot of it is just general console attitude (I am nearly possitive you are on 360 but maybe PS3)

But the above is just silly. hardcoe FPS players... frankly are NOT console players. The whole idea of a console is instant gratification and throw away games. To play heavily for a while until the next "shiny" comes along and then you sell the old and buy the new. Some people are different but the concept of a console is that. Simple, instant, forgettable.


The "hardcoe" fps scene is on the PC and Brink appeals just fine to them with 3 leagues going right now. Only a few weeks after release... 3 leagues! Leagues do not need the flashy "OMG I JUST BLEW THIS GUYS HEAD OFF!" because its all about the gameplay itself. The mentality you are thinking is the typical console players mentality of show me something I am not supposed to be seeing... contraversial does not = good. I was bored to tears with MW2... the multiplayer was random people doing random things and the single player was a FPS on rails. Did it look good... yes, was it fun gameplay... not to this long term and "hardcoe" FPS player.

But as typical console... when Halo was released everyone thought it was the greatest thing in the world... when it was released on PC everyone saw how far backwards it took FPS games.

Sorry for this rant... but seriously people want to change every game into something else... enjoy the game for what it is... or do not. Its very simple.

Too bad the multiplayer and the campaign missions are the same except bad ai are replaced with people. and the back story is based on bs science and unrealistic optimism.

FPS's have moved to the consuls. Have you ever herd of a MMORPG theres one called world of warcraft way more computer gamers play that than all the other fps's

FPS's have moved to the consuls. Have you ever herd of a MMORPG theres one called world of warcraft way more computer gamers play that than all the other fps's

Oh, please, that's just [censored] being fed to you by Microsoft. The FPS was born on the PC, and built for the PC.

Just about every RPG to ever exist works better on the PC than consoles.

Full-scale RTS's are nearly impossible on consoles.


Hell, if anything, you're going out of your way to attack us PC gamers.

What a coincidence... I'm playing Rome: Total War right now... ._.

To continue to prove his point... Yes, RTS games like RTW would not be possible with the crap joystick controls... Honestly, try controlling an entire army in quick succession on a PS3... This is one reason why I'm getting a decent PC so I can enjoy Shogun 2: Total War...

PC gamers your not dead to me >;o I have a PS3 but I have HIGH respect for you all!

Oh, please, that's just [censored] being fed to you by Microsoft. The FPS was born on the PC, and built for the PC.

Just about every RPG to ever exist works better on the PC than consoles.

Full-scale RTS's are nearly impossible on consoles.


Hell, if anything, you're going out of your way to attack us PC gamers.

They're not crap. Just not nearly quick enough.

Consoles get a major advantage over movement in FPSes, due to the fact that they can tilt the joystick gradually, and PC players get full speed or full stop.

Im a consoul gamer and i attacked first. The pc is good for MMORPG, Minecraft and Google. Other than that and the classic video games you can only play on pc everything else will go to consul. Why do you think fewer and fewer games have dedicated servers for pc gamers YOU ARE BEING PHASED OUT

Full-scale RTS's are nearly impossible on consoles.

Im a consoul gamer and i attacked first. The pc is good for MMORPG, Minecraft and Google. Other than that and the classic video games you can only play on pc everything else will go to consul. Why do you think fewer and fewer games have dedicated servers for pc gamers YOU ARE BEING PHASED OUT

soooo, you've generalized gamer audiences in saying that for a game to be good or "hardcoe", games have to have more realistic violence and micheal bay "edgy" movie graphics which by some miracle would deepen elements of the story?!?

No theyll stay on pc, but fps will move to console

That's Americans for ya. Yes, I'm american, been american all my life, I'm not bashing.

But really, any action moviemade in america consists of the same gratutious violence, dismayed Bond Girl, and miraculous saving at the end. Every single one, and that's leaked throughout the rest of the entertainment field.

They were BORN on the PC... BUILT for PC... They will STAY on PC primarily, while your CoD audience will stay on consoles. Mods will never come to the console... They will be on PC.



:facepalm: +10K and an icecream cone... :icecream:

FPS's have moved to the consuls. Have you ever herd of a MMORPG theres one called world of warcraft way more computer gamers play that than all the other fps's

I can tell that you know nothing about movies bc michael bay isnt edgy he likes to blow stuff up, and feature horrible female actresses in stiletos. I can tell you know nothing about video games bc you say brink has good gameplay which it dosnt, the gameplay from story to mulitplayer is the same, and its the same every mission with only 1 gametype thats really bad

I just say the truth as I see it is all.

Just apparently my view happens to be yours. Great minds think alike, eh? :foodndrink:

If great minds really though alike there wouldnt be any new inventions bc they would have all thought of the same ones, and everybody would think of the same "new" improvements