its a shame
much of the crysis community are a shame..
when crysis comes out everyone liket it they said its an epic game, it is of course. but when crysis 2 comes out most said omg this is game suc*s and blablaba. then crysis 3 comes out and a few said omg its like crysis 2 and its so short it suc*s and blalbalba
its so sad to see that crysis is gonna hatet since crysis 2 from its own community
im sure crytek tried to make everyone happy but it look likes that the most are unfriendly haters who never be happy. the only thing i see when crysis 3 comes out was how bad something is and what they all should fix, never a good game crytek or seomthing, sure much like crysis 2 and 3, but if i look the rates from crysis 1 and 2 ...i cant understand why crysis 2 is so much hatet, its one of the best games everymade, i often hear, the graphics is not so good as crysis 1, they have do do it for consoles they need the money hhaa lol, and the graphics from crysis 2 is very good so dont cry about that. i heard that the levels are so small and simular (hope thats right word) its good how its is, how should they make a open world city? and the levels arent so small how u say..they said its like cod the gameplay and weapons etc so far ...they said the mp was so full of bugs, yes i sew much bugs but i never had any problem with it, the mp was very good and made some fun. crysis 2 is an awesome game, think about it.

Now crysis 3

i like crysis 3, personaly i liked the other crysis games more, but that dont means its not good. it has the best graphics ever, the gameplay is from crysis 2 which is very good, the levels are bigger and the design is veryyyy awesome. yeah the game is very short which is a big - in crysis 3, but no reason to hate the game. the story is good, not epic or perfect but good. the mp is much different as crysis 2, which his levels and weapons and and and...much are saying it have so much bugs? i have no bugs. much are crying becouse the weapons or attachments are to powerfull mimimimi. or that its fail becouse "here x reason" .
No its not, Crysis 2 was epic so epic, and crysis 3 is very good 2.
Stop hating the whole time, and say ty crytek, only time.

Ty for reading

*sorry for my bad english*

Save your breath. C1 / Wars was good. C2 / C3 are nothing but cheap COD clones. Nothing like C1 / Wars. And Crytek didn't give a ****. They thought they could **** the old community and make more money on console kiddies and COD. Jokes on them. They can **** burn.

blahblahblahblah

i see, u didnt understand.

Ignore them, they're the two biggest trolls on this forum.

ok, and what do u think about my post adam?

I agree with what you say. There's numerous reason why people simply don't love the third game in the series and it's mostly not because the game is bad. Thing is, people are trying to compare something against nostalgia, you simply aren't going to love a newer game if you're stuck in the past. I can understand that sentiment because of how i felt about many games when I was younger though I was already in my mid 20's when Crysis 1 came out and can accept changes for what they are in the later games. It's like, they loved the original game so much that change is not acceptable even if it largely improves the gameplay experience. Thing is, even if the game was an exact clone of the original game in formula, they would still not love it as much simply because the newness of it has worn off and the nostalgia for the original games will not allow you to enjoy it as much. Plus it would also be panned for simply being a copy-paste and lacking originality. You can't win that kind of argument, stuck between a rock and a hard-place.

That being said, the new game isn't perfect, it's too short for one. I still thoroughly enjoyed it, Crytek really has come much farther in storytelling (if you disagree you seriously need to replay the original game again or read the old reviews trashing it's storyline). This is part of the reason why they changed the formula in Crysis 2, though it leads to it's own feeling of being disjointed. I can see why they changed it up though and it's tied fairly well together in the third game, at least it makes more sense now (different stages of Ceph explain the alterations). The storyline in the sequels is better when you go back and play the original without being stuck in nostalgia. Same goes for the suit, the original nanosuit is very clunky when you're used to the smoothness of the changes in the sequels. I adjusted to it, but again you can see why they changed it. People blame the consoles, well that *might* have influenced it but even if it was PC only these things would have changed anyway.

The only thing I dislike about multiplayer is the lack of power struggle, but that's nothing new. I have some gripes but it's mostly around two things, which is lack of power struggle in MP like in 1/wars and the shortness of the campaign. Still a good game overall, but that's why it's a 8.0 and not a 9.0 like the original (which does feel its age a bit when you go back and play it now, which I just did last week).

yeah ur right,
crysis 2 and 3 made not everything perfect, but 1 and warhead didnt too.
thing is that they gonna hate games, like the game has nothing made good.

I think Crysis 3 multiplayer needed Power Struggle. We ended up with spears instead. I understand why they did it because to make a real power struggle it would need 100% of it's own, custom maps and vehicles. It would probably require it's own amount of development equal to the rest of the entire multiplayer. That's why the original game mostly was ONLY power struggle, yeah it had instant action (deathmatch) with team instant action (team deathmatch) added in wars but it was all about power struggle. They got away from it probably because they prolly had to make a choice, either devote the time to the current MP OR modify the original type. I think they should have done both but I also don't know what their development resources are either and likely they simply couldn't do both.

Campaign even if it was twice as long only carries modern games like this so far, it needs multiplayer to stay alive. This is why the BF and COD games are around, most people simply do not buy them for singleplayer, it's all about online.

yes
power struggle was an epic experience in crysis / wars
but the mp in crysis 2 / 3 is more "simply" and yes, for cod like
but with the cryengine 3 on crysis 3 a power struggle with very big maps vehicles etc would be to powerfull for our pcs i think, and took to long to make, and play for players, they need a mode for every player-group.