Japan to dump 11,500 tons of radioactive water at sea

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:45 pm

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/japan-dump-11-500-tons-radioactive-water-sea-20110404-014134-688.html

Japan plans to dump 11,500 tons of radioactive water at sea to free up storage space at its crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant for more highly contaminated water, the plant's operator said Monday. A spokesman for Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) said the water that the company intends to release into the Pacific is only weakly radioactive and has to be cleared out to make room for more radioactive waste water.


Lots of mutated fishes are going to pop up in Japanese seas in the near future. And the Japanese live on fish.
User avatar
Steve Smith
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:47 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:26 pm

This is madness! It hits 8 on the blasphemy scale! Why put it in the water where evryone across the globe shares?
User avatar
Tessa Mullins
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:17 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:10 am

This is madness! It hits 8 on the blasphemy scale! Why put it in the water where evryone across the globe shares?


11,500 tons of radioactive water wont matter much on global scale. AFAIK

Maybe coast and local seafood will suffer, but in global scale? nope.
User avatar
John Moore
 
Posts: 3294
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:18 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:55 am

JAPAN: We will be the first nation to properly dispose of radioactive waste! Just use the VERY THING WE ALL LIVE OFF OF.

>>
User avatar
Rachel Hall
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:41 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:00 am

11,500 tons of radioactive water wont matter much on global scale. AFAIK

Maybe coast and local seafood will suffer, but in global scale? nope.

Yeah, they are going to have to battle some pretty tough dolphins. Like ones that can shoot energy beams from their eyes and squeak as loud as the sonic weapons.
User avatar
JUDY FIGHTS
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:25 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:43 am

The papers I read this morning say they are planning/building a wall to prevent leakage to the sea, or something similar.
User avatar
Alexxxxxx
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:55 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:44 pm

The papers I read this morning say they are planning/building a wall to prevent leakage to the sea, or something similar.

Too late for negotiations, already dumped.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/japan-starts-dumping-radioactive-water-sea-20110404-045303-833.html
User avatar
Kara Payne
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:47 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:21 am

Most of the radioactivity is iodine, with a half life of 8 days. The lifetime of the radioactivity is small, the amount dumped is small. It is almost impossible for there to be any ecological effects from this.
User avatar
Emma-Jane Merrin
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:52 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:53 am

The lifetime of the radioactivity is small, the amount dumped is small. It is almost impossible for there to be any ecological effects from this.

We'll wait a few years and see what the fishes at the dumping area look like. They already said that they would quarantine the zone from fishing, how can that be "no ecological effects"?
User avatar
c.o.s.m.o
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:21 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:19 am

Highly radioactive water has been leaking into the sea for days if not longer, so I doubt this is their main concern, as shocking as it is.
User avatar
courtnay
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:49 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:37 am

We'll wait a few years and see what the fishes at the dumping area look like. They already said that they would quarantine the zone from fishing, how can that be "no ecological effects"?


Liability issues.

Here's an example:

I work at wal-mart. If I have a broken jug of bleach, I can't dump it down the drain, it is illegal to do so even though millions of people every day mop their floors using bleach and them pour the remainder down the drain. Why is it illegal? Liability issues.
User avatar
Eileen Collinson
 
Posts: 3208
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:42 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:46 am

Highly radioactive water has been leaking into the sea for days if not longer, so I doubt this is their main concern, as shocking as it is.

Good point. But radiation is really bad, if just a tiny bit. They said Chernobyl was fine after the disaster, but why did so many infants get born deformed around the area?
User avatar
Josh Sabatini
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:47 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:46 am

We'll wait a few years and see what the fishes at the dumping area look like.



Mireluks? :whistling:
User avatar
benjamin corsini
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:32 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:14 am

Good point. But radiation is really bad, if just a tiny bit. They said Chernobyl was fine after the disaster, but why did so many infants get born deformed around the area?

Of course water like this issue, but especially (radioactive dust) particles that get in the body and never leave. The concentration of that depending on how far away and how downwind they were.
User avatar
Elizabeth Lysons
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:16 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:29 am

Good point. But radiation is really bad, if just a tiny bit. They said Chernobyl was fine after the disaster, but why did so many infants get born deformed around the area?

You can look it up but yes, the authorities did tell the people not to worry during the Chernobyl disaster, and that everything was fine. Though the people learned the truth soon enough. Obviously Japan is doing anything they can to stop something like the catastrophe of Chernobyl from happening again.
User avatar
Kat Ives
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:11 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:30 am

For sake of comparison I thought I would mention that the Deepwater Horizon spill last year amounted to 6.4 million tons of released contaminant, with toxins which will remain in the ecological chain for a lot longer than the short-halflife isotopes in this Japanese release (which should only last about a week, as PhYoshi mentioned.)
User avatar
N3T4
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:17 pm

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/japan-dump-11-500-tons-radioactive-water-sea-20110404-014134-688.html

Lots of mutated fishes are going to pop up in Japanese seas in the near future. And the Japanese live on fish.

Real life Blinkys! :)
http://simpsons.wikia.com/wiki/Blinky

Yeah, they are going to have to battle some pretty tough dolphins. Like ones that can shoot energy beams from their eyes and squeak as loud as the sonic weapons.

Nah, the dolphins are already singing the Star Spangled Banner ;)

As for the dumping, wasn't it the lesser of two evils? 1) dump this short half-life water in order to contain higher-half life water. 2) Don't dump and let the longer half-life water keep seeping.

All re need is for Raymond Burr to show up...then you KNOW we are in trouble!
User avatar
Ryan Lutz
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:39 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:27 pm

I saw a mudcrab the other day...
User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:19 pm

I saw a mudcrab the other day...

Disgusting creatures . . .
User avatar
Eilidh Brian
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:45 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:33 pm

The Mutant Turtles will become Samurai and preform seppuku for failing their mission in assassinating the Fish Shognate of Seapan...

Oh, we are serious are we?
User avatar
Charlie Sarson
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:27 am

And thus, Godzilla was created.
User avatar
Silvia Gil
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:31 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:39 am

Just for the sake of not being total misinformation, this is nothing like chernobyl. Chernobyl was effectively a dirty bomb, an entire reactor's worth of nuclear fuel being thrown up into the atmosphere and left to settle for hundreds of miles around. It was literally the worst case of worst cases.

For putting everything into a bit of scale: In order to go above safe radioactive limits, you cannot take a banana into a reactor chamber. Not because you might get things dirty, but because the banana is radioactive enough to go over the safe limits. If you open a banana in the reactor room on a nuclear submarine, you have to get a decontamination team in there. Eating one banana every day for a year irradiates you more than living in immediate proximity to three mile island after the meltdown. Radioactive safety measures are incredibly strict, and breaking them does not mean chernobyl. Chernobyl is a literal impossibility here - it can go badly, but it's not out of control yet, and even the worst case will not come anywhere near chernobyl.
User avatar
Hilm Music
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:36 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:29 am

We'll wait a few years and see what the fishes at the dumping area look like. They already said that they would quarantine the zone from fishing, how can that be "no ecological effects"?


The main issue is dealing with concentration vs. dispersion ratio and how quickly the radiation will disperse within a large body of water such as the Pacific ocean. If I had to equate it to anything it would be like putting a drop of food coloring into a swimming pool. You know it went in, but is barely noticeable if even possibly detectable once it is fully dispersed. Also as said that radioactive material will decay into nothing within a period of time depending upon the different types. Only thing that concerns me is them using that infernal MOX blend of Plutonium and Uranium Oxide.
User avatar
Karine laverre
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:50 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:34 am

Smart move Japanese.

When you get a Nuclear crisis, you gotta bring it to all of us.
User avatar
Alyesha Neufeld
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:45 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:15 am

Most of the radioactivity is iodine, with a half life of 8 days. The lifetime of the radioactivity is small, the amount dumped is small. It is almost impossible for there to be any ecological effects from this.


For sake of comparison I thought I would mention that the Deepwater Horizon spill last year amounted to 6.4 million tons of released contaminant, with toxins which will remain in the ecological chain for a lot longer than the short-halflife isotopes in this Japanese release (which should only last about a week, as PhYoshi mentioned.)


Just for the sake of not being total misinformation, this is nothing like chernobyl. Chernobyl was effectively a dirty bomb, an entire reactor's worth of nuclear fuel being thrown up into the atmosphere and left to settle for hundreds of miles around. It was literally the worst case of worst cases.

For putting everything into a bit of scale: In order to go above safe radioactive limits, you cannot take a banana into a reactor chamber. Not because you might get things dirty, but because the banana is radioactive enough to go over the safe limits. If you open a banana in the reactor room on a nuclear submarine, you have to get a decontamination team in there. Eating one banana every day for a year irradiates you more than living in immediate proximity to three mile island after the meltdown. Radioactive safety measures are incredibly strict, and breaking them does not mean chernobyl. Chernobyl is a literal impossibility here - it can go badly, but it's not out of control yet, and even the worst case will not come anywhere near chernobyl.

I wish more people would read and actually try to understand posts like these. But of course ignoring them and crying doom and destruction is much simpler.
User avatar
Lizzie
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:51 am

Next

Return to Othor Games