I doubt that will be the case. I agree with what Nicho wrote earlier: the features of Fallout 4 were most likely decided long ago. They're probably into the Q&A phase by now.

guys, a person can make more than one type of game.. just because someone made an arguably sub-par shooter, doesn't mean they can only make an arguably sub-par shooter


just like how someone who is good at Fishing, isn't only good at fishing. or someone who works in web-design can likely do more than just web-design

Hopefully Alexander gave him some pointers before he left...

---------

As for those afraid of an MP Fallout, I wouldn't mind a MP aspect to it, optional and limited. MMO definitely not, but maybe something along the lines of Dark Souls. Not exactly, and I can't give specifics, but that would be cool.

Of course he could be brought in for some othe4 job entirely, maybe in management, maybe another (new) IP and Bethesda is going to expand? So many ways this could go.

I'll drink to that. Very well put.

Oh, I know BGS didn't develop ESO. I was just saying that in theory there is nothing wrong with a game company building and maintaining more than one MMO and that it has been done before.

While BGS probably did have something to do with ESO, it would have been as an advisory/oversight capacity, and had nothing to do with development.

"No, you cannot put jump jets into Elder Scrolls. If you want players to travel fast, give them horses."

"There are no Mongols in Elder Scrolls. Just stop with the Mongol Hordes."

"Hobbits? HOBBITS!!!! ARE YOU MAD?"

Sounds like a strong addition to me. I say welcome.

Welcome Josh Hamrick, help BGS give us revolutionary gameplay

Agreed, I'm sure Josh Hamrick is highly skilled in regard to video games and certainly no "one trick pony" who can definitely bring something good to the table at Bethesda HQ.

+1