so i just bougt.. : Crysis

» Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:17 am

so i just bought a gtx 560 for 300 euro's

is it worth it?

» Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:21 pm

rofl no thats way too much. for that kind of money you could have bought a 570! NOOB! As for Crysis 2 it will run pretty good

» Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:57 am

so i just bought a gtx 560 for 300 euro's

is it worth it?

Well if what he said about a 570 is really true you could try sending it back on the grounds that Crysis 2 is not a DX11 game and that therefore the 560 doesn't play Crysis 2 in DX11 as described and that therefore your goods are not as described. Then get a refund and buy a 570.

» Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:33 pm

omg 300 euros for a gtx 560 ?!!!!! :O

The card is great I myself bought a asus gtx 560 a few days ago for $250 to replace the gts 250 I was using, the performance boost is huuuge.

» Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:19 am

it says its made to run in dx 11 now im confused it even has crysis 2 on the back picture

» Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:22 pm

so i just bought a gtx 560 for 300 euro's

is it worth it?

for crysis 2 NO! also for 300koko! NO! you could have bought an HD6950 for lower price and better performance!CHeers!

» Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:13 pm

60 fps on bad company 2 dx 11 maxed out bad performance?

» Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:19 pm

it says its made to run in dx 11 now im confused it even has crysis 2 on the back picture

If you bought it to play Crysis 2 in DX11 I wouldn't open it yet. Just to be on the safe side, but even if you have I would think given it has this on the box you can probably still send it back and they have to refund you. "Goods not as described".

» Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:50 pm

so i just bought a gtx 560 for 300 euro's

is it worth it?

for crysis 2 NO! also for 300koko! NO! you could have bought an HD6950 for lower price and better performance!CHeers!

I bet you that ATI cards perform like **** compared to Nvidia cards on Crysis 2. It will be like Hawx 2. Maybe that is why DX11 is delayed the ATI frame rates are too high lols.

» Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:13 am

The demo ran perfectly fine on my 6850, don't see why the full game wouldn't.

» Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:38 pm

The demo ran perfectly fine on my 6850, don't see why the full game wouldn't.

You have a direct comparison to a GTX560 on the beta?

» Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:54 am

Since I have no idea how it runs on one of those, no, but the point was that it doesn't run like crap on ATI cards. Unless you call 60 fps on hardcoe at 1680x1050 "crap".

» Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:49 pm

Since I have no idea how it runs on one of those, no, but the point was that it doesn't run like crap on ATI cards. Unless you call 60 fps on hardcoe at 1680x1050 "crap".

I said compared to Nvidia cards. What I mean is if an Nvidia card significantly outdoes it's ATI equivilent.

» Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:12 pm

No, you edited in "compared to Nvidia cards" after I replied.

» Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:32 pm

No, you edited in "compared to Nvidia cards" after I replied.

Even if I did (I don't recall editing that specifically) your comment was still in reference to a post which I had already edited. Not saying it's your fault but thats just how it is. You were attacking me about a statement that if I ever made it (and I think we rely on your memory here) I had already retracted.