if i cut your arm once you wont die, if you had a gun and i cut you once you'd shot me once and probably kill me, so why ask for a non-instakill weapon(IRL) to be OHK and a OHK weapon(IRL) to not be?
If you shoot a guy in the arm, he wont die either. The lethality of both weapons depends on placement. If you are comparing one bullet to one 6" combat knife stab, though, the knife would tend to do more trauma.
first of all, knives are for stabbing. not slashing. that being said ... what do you think happens when you insert a 7 inch knife below the center of the left shoulder blade between the 3rd and 4th ribs pointing upward at a 30 degree angle toward the center mass of the chest? ill give you a hint. it perforates the left lung and enters the heart. granted you may not die for a minute or two but you can't yell for help either.
in RL ... (real life) the knife requires the most skill of any weapon that a soldier has at their disposal due in part that when used properly it allows them to incapacitate an individual in such a way that it makes ZERO noise rendering the ememy "combat ineffective" without making their presence known. why do you think they teach knife tactics to operators in the special forces community? because their ability to go unnoticed is absolutely critical.
wow. what a jerk.
If the game gave you an OHK if you managed to hit that target of about 1"x4", along with headshots, then I wouldn't mind. This is a horrible argument for claiming that all knife attacks should be OHK though.
the stab in BC2 is perfect and is what i was referring to when i started this thread. my apologizes for not making that clear. it has a slight delay and a very small effective radius making it almost worthless when used defensibly .... or offensively for that matter. you will never see someone run into a room and take out more then one player with a knife before being shot. it's just too slow. stabbing in BC2 is almost always a planned event and it requires a fair amount of skill.
Then you should be happy about the way knives are in brink. Now they are actually useful in normal gameplay, and not just a gimmick. You can use your knife whenever you want while still holding your pistol, so you just have to get in close, shoot a few times, and stab and they are down much faster than the pistol alone. Or, you can knock them down with a slide tackle and stab them, as rammite pointed out.
Why do you think silencers were invented? To look cool? What do you think happens when a round is fired into the back of someone's skull from a silenced weapon? I'll give you a hint. They die. And I am not worried about what happens in real life anyways. In case you haven't noticed this is a forum for a VIDEO GAME. And in a video game having a button that instantly kills anyone on your screen within 10 feet of you (as it is in most games that include a knife) is unbalanced and NOT fun. And video games are about FUN, not realism. And calling people a jerk in an attempt to belittle their argument just makes you look incompetent. If you can't defend your point of view without insulting the other person then you've already lost.
Suppressors are not truly silent. They can cut down on almost all of the gunshot, but there is still noise from the gun parts moving, bullet traveling through the air, and impacting the target. If you were to use a .22 pistol like SOCOM does, then you could make this argument, but most bullets still make noise when suppressed, its just a different and less-loud noise.