look at skyrim peter m

Post » Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:26 am

For me fable was a game that was so lovely,beautifull.....The first one was good.The seccond one was ehhhhh with looks better.Nice world to walk around in.3 was overhiped
I was a bit sad that it didn't had al the good features in it that could have made it a succes........But now......skyrim is almost h ere.
Everything that was not there in fable is in skyrim.difficulty lush surroundings, detail.I can go on forever.....So peter.hope you play the game and learn from it.This is how you make a follow up gamewise.
And we can get killed.Someone said that the spells in skyrim look similar to the spells in fable.....yeaaaaaaa. love it....Now i can play a game the way it is supposed to be.
Every game should develop like the elder scrolls .(sorry if my english isn't that good guys) .
User avatar
rolanda h
 
Posts: 3314
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:09 pm

Post » Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:30 pm

i've come to the opinion that PM is the michael jackson of the gaming industry; he did some awesome stuff early on in his career, but slowly started losing his mind until he was nothing like the man we once knew and loved... :sadvaultboy: .

PM and fable are dead in my book; seeing that ridiculous kinect fable game was the final nail in the coffin.
User avatar
casey macmillan
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:37 pm

Post » Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:45 pm

Peter is gonna do what Peter wants as we all know.

Skyrim over Fable anyday.
User avatar
kirsty williams
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:56 am

Post » Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:25 pm

i've come to the opinion that PM is the michael jackson of the gaming industry; he did some awesome stuff early on in his career, but slowly started losing his mind until he was nothing like the man we once knew and loved... :sadvaultboy: .

PM and fable are dead in my book; seeing that ridiculous kinect fable game was the final nail in the coffin.




Yea.Y would think the same.No more fable for me .And i was a biiiiiig fan.Untill they [censored] it up with things like the quests.....Quests ? no ,fetch and bring back to my sister stuff.
And what is see in skyrim in the video's so far when you open a chest there is actually something of valeu in it. like real treasures......boooooo peter. eat your heart out. good looking treasure that mean something....
User avatar
Saul C
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:41 pm

Post » Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:56 pm

For me fable was a game that was so lovely,beautifull.....The first one was good.The seccond one was ehhhhh with looks better.Nice world to walk around in.3 was overhiped
I was a bit sad that it didn't had al the good features in it that could have made it a succes........But now......skyrim is almost h ere.
Everything that was not there in fable is in skyrim.difficulty lush surroundings, detail.I can go on forever.....So peter.hope you play the game and learn from it.This is how you make a follow up gamewise.
And we can get killed.Someone said that the spells in skyrim look similar to the spells in fable.....yeaaaaaaa. love it....Now i can play a game the way it is supposed to be.
Every game should develop like the elder scrolls .(sorry if my english isn't that good guys) .


On the whole, the Fable games HAVE gotten bigger and offered more, in terms of content, with each game. The real problem for many, myself included, is that they have changed the setting a little more than would have been hoped for AND, that they tend to get rid of good things even while they add other good things.

Fable IIIs world was much larger and prettier than the previous installments. The characters looked better. The game also offered some of THE BEST DROP IN/DROP OUT LOCAL CO-OP I've seen in any RPG style game since Baldur's Gate.

Having said that, they disregarded half of the lore from the first game, never bothered to revisit favoured places from earlier games, like The Northern Wastes, and failed to deal with places long in the lore, like Samarkand. They added stupid gauntlets that made the hero seem like a pale shadow of his/her forbears, and while the spell weaving was a definite improvement, the game offered fewer spell.

Pound for Pound the third game offered more and was a better game. . . HOWEVER, there were many things from the earlier games that it did not bother to hold onto, and as a result it was a far less impressive game than it could and should have been.

Skyrim has done some shifting from Oblivion. Hopefully the changes will mostly be positive (though I cannot see how to make a good thing out of the loss of spellmaking).
User avatar
Tanya
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:01 am

Post » Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:22 pm

One of the things I'll remember most about Fable was how bad I felt for a friend of mine who bought it. At the time, he'd just bought a money pit of a house that was consuming nearly all of his income. He had money for just one game that year, and he decided it would be Fable. Knowing now how short the game is, you can imagine how frustrating it would be if you were able to buy just one game that entire year, and that was the one you chose.

I tried to loan him my Xbox copy of Morrowind, but he would have none of it. He was too proud to admit he'd spent his money on such a short game, and just kept playing and replaying it for the rest of the year.
User avatar
Heather beauchamp
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:05 pm

Post » Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:09 pm

One of the things I'll remember most about Fable was how bad I felt for a friend of mine who bought it. At the time, he'd just bought a money pit of a house that was consuming nearly all of his income. He had money for just one game that year, and he decided it would be Fable. Knowing now how short the game is, you can imagine how frustrating it would be if you were able to buy just one game that entire year, and that was the one you chose.

I tried to loan him my Xbox copy of Morrowind, but he would have none of it. He was too proud to admit he'd spent his money on such a short game, and just kept playing and replaying it for the rest of the year.


THAT is a sad story.

Fable was certainly drastically over-hyped.

My hope was that a lot of that would get resolved to some degree in Fable 2 which I found much more disappointing than Fable 1. Never got around to Fable 3... maybe will sometime down the road when I can get it for $5.
User avatar
Tessa Mullins
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:17 am

Post » Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:53 pm

Peter Molyneux certainly has some sleepless nights ahead of him. Skyrim is delivering more than any of his past games promised, COMBINED. And alot of the promises are the same ones. Not to mention that, Bethesda gets what makes good fantasy games. FANTASY. It seems with every new Fable game, they get rid of more fantasy elements to the point where its barely a fable anymore. Honestly, there's no reason or justification for Fable to exist as long as Skyrim does.
User avatar
Oceavision
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:52 am


Return to V - Skyrim