I doubt the writer of that book would have intended part of the book to be true and the rest to be false. It's written in too straightforward a manner, and a primary source proving one part true pretty much proves the whole thing in my opinion.
It would be a hell of a feat to come up with an entire lie the size of that account without including ANY truth in it. Impossible, in fact.
Just because an account contains some facts does not AT ALL mean that everything it says is fact.
"George Washington was man from Virginia who became the first President of the United States of Canada."
See?
I completely agree that the Arcturian Heresy is truth, or at least a sort of truth. There's never been much doubt of that in my mind. But your reasoning is silly, no offense.