I completely disagree. I always imagine that 'transforming into a wolf at the full moon' means just that. Turning into some kind of hideous humanoid wolf mutant looks like some kind of genetic engineering mix up. The bipedal werewolf was an invention by Hollywood as a special effect that looked scary to a modern audience. (Wolves don't really have the same fear-factor effect that they did 800 years ago, unless you're walking along a beach on the night of the full moon in a country with no natural wolves and you notice a gigantic wolf-shaped shadow gently stalking you. Then you sh*t your pants. It's only after you find out it's your neighbour's husky, which should be living 10,000km away in Alaska, that you are ashamed of your fear. True story.)
after all, I do have a strong suspicion that the man-beast hybrid comes from those native americans who dressed up in wolf pelts to gain the powers of a wolf. (I don't have any knowledge of native american folk law, so that is probably a gross misunderstanding)
I think it's a preference thing to be honest, and I guess that the popular depiction of a bipedal werewolf is what I should expect. I just happened to read a book recently about a firm of werewolf lawyers who turned into wolves, rather than gained wolf characteristics, and so I'm pretty happy with that idea. Mind you, I don't see anyone objecting if the werewolf looked twice as awesome as a regular wolf (cause it was twice as big or whatever), because that would be great. On the other hand, if a werewolf was some little pathetic flea infested bedraggled thing with a limp, then I personally would murder everything smaller than your average rat in my rage, before a rat accidentally ate me.
Shape-shifting technically is the same as Lycanthropy, where Lycanthropy is the specific transformation into a wolf at the full moon. It's the same topic, unless you are talking about Twilight. Twilight was disgusting. Anyone who uses Twilight as the be all and end all of vampires/werewolves/shape-shifters needs to have their first period. Actually, anyone who can think that Twilight is a source that someone can USE when discussing werewolves and vampires needs to clean the vomit out from between their ears. Why don't we just have sparkly vampires instead of sun damage? Then you could sparkle everyone to death.
That's great that you disagree, and there would be some instances where I would agree with your view. But TES werewolves are what they are. It's the lore. It's not my opinion.
And let me put it to you this way (which IS my opinion) - A wolf is a canine creature that was tamed by humans to eventually become the breeds of dogs we know today. They were almost hunted to extinction in North America, and are now treated like vermin in most parts of the world. Wolves are more of a curiosity in the wild for the past hundred years, rather than an actual danger or threat.
With those facts in mind, I feel that a supernatural beast with super-powered strength, speed, and agility, which can be a human or beast, can only be harmed by immense damage or special silver or magical weaponry, and which looks like a UFC fighter with the natural weaponry of a wolf - super-sized - is far more intimidating and fitting of being a fantasy monster that I would be afraid of. And more importantly, I would rather play a werewolf than a wolf in a videogame, by a margin of 1000 to 1.
I like the shapeshifting-into-a-wolf idea, too, but it's not TES lore, and it's not scary to me, and I wouldn't ever like being one unless there were some practical purpose to it. And btw, I love
Ladyhawke and its lore about curses and shapeshifting. Great film, and I love that concept for what it is. But again, that's entirely different.