Made me sick, literally

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:34 am

Despite all the advice given over the past two or more years in the TES V Ideas and Discussion thread the Developers have chosen to go with a grey/black&white colour scheme, they have used creatures which are in every other game of this genre (dragons) and are focusing on graphics again (same mistake they made with oblivion).


Are you color blind? :facepalm:

Just kidding.

But still, how can you hate TES? It has awesome graphics and you can't deny it. Don't forget about the superb gameplay!
User avatar
Casey
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:38 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:51 pm

I enjoy how Skyrim looks,its seems this game's art style will never appeal to emotional train wrecks. Most of us are sound individuals who will purchase the game.
User avatar
Sheeva
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:46 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:34 pm

I understand what you're saying, and mostly agree, however, Elder Scrolls has taken a turn from fantasy game to Dungeons and Dragons with this latest game. I would have preferred to never see that happen. There is no excuse for putting dragons in a TES game (in my mind).


But the Elder Scrolls told of their return!! You should have listened! It's all cool though, because there's one they fear.

On a more serious note, do you remember Akatosh?? He was a dragon :D. Or at least appeared as on in Oblivion.
User avatar
Shaylee Shaw
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:55 pm

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:06 pm

I first heard that Skyrim is coming out a day ago, and have just now watched the trailer. Despite all the advice given over the past two or more years in the TES V Ideas and Discussion thread the Developers have chosen to go with a grey/black&white colour scheme, they have used creatures which are in every other game of this genre (dragons) and are focusing on graphics again (same mistake they made with oblivion). We all gave very nice ideas in the discussion thread and were repeatedly told that the developers were in fact reading what we said, when in truth we might as well have been pissing on a wall. I almost threw up when I saw the trailer.

This is one game I will not be paying for, and I hope the same is true for all who offered their time and effort to make a great game in the discussion thread and are just now realizing that the devs don't listen to what the people want. I will be eagerly waiting another 6 years for TES VI to come out though in the hope that gamesas will learn from it's last two failures and place the game in several provinces with less focus on graphics and more focus on good old fashion gameplay with an extreme other world feel.

Rant end.

I really must debate this with you. Though the graphics are still fantastic, you should look into what the game is really all about. You clearly haven't researched it enough. And also, one person's consistent opinion is not going to deliver a form-fitting game to that one person. And finally, you said that " they have used creatures which are in every other game of this genre (dragons)", 'creatures' is plural and you only gave one type of creature, the Dragon. Dragons have never been in an Elder Scrolls game before, so this is quite new for Bethesda. They have always been a part of the lore, so why didn't you quit playing years ago if you knew that there were Dragons mentioned somewhere?
User avatar
Jamie Moysey
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 6:31 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:42 am

He is just pissed off because Todd Howard didn't come to a personal visit, kneel before him and beg him to become the new Lead Designer of TES games.
He is also pissed off because he is not getting a Morrowind 2. if you read his posts, you will see that he is one of those who, for God knows which reason, believe that TES = Morrowind... which is very, very, very far from truth... TES is more often a classic fantasy then alien like MW and SI.

The very fact that he argues even tough he has only seen one trailer shows that he didn't even try to see what Skyrim is about: he saw it ain't MW2, that the game has good graphics instead of being a Indie game and got pissed off.I Don't want to flame him but what else can you do? If he spent at least few hours on collecting info about Skyrim I'd be more respectful. But he didn't: he admitted it himself that he just saw a trailer and thats it.. .a trailer that is supposed to be nothing more then a teaser.

Oh, and about DnD... I am not a DnD fan but it is getting kinda annoying to see that people they think that DnD = classic fantasy. DnD works well even with alien settings and is actually just a set of rules and ideas, not a setting. The fact that most DnD settings are Classic Fantasy is choice of campaign makers, not a DnD rule.

Oh, and a dragon appeared in The Elder Scrolls Adventures: Redguard. The lore also cofirms that dragons are part of TES universe... a important part of TES to the boot... So OP, where did you get the idea that dragons are not part of TES?
User avatar
Julie Serebrekoff
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:41 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:28 am

He is just pissed off because Todd Howard didn't come to a personal visit, kneel before him and beg him to become the new Lead Designer of TES games.
He is also pissed off because he is not getting a Morrowind 2. if you read his posts, you will see that he is one of those who, for God knows which reason, believe that TES = Morrowind... which is very, very, very far from truth... TES is more often a classic fantasy then alien like MW and SI.

The very fact that he argues even tough he has only seen one trailer shows that he didn't even try to see what Skyrim is about: he saw it ain't MW2, that the game has good graphics instead of being a Indie game and got pissed off.I Don't want to flame him but what else can you do? If he spent at least few hours on collecting info about Skyrim I'd be more respectful. But he didn't: he admitted it himself that he just saw a trailer and thats it.. .a trailer that is supposed to be nothing more then a teaser.

Oh, and about DnD... I am not a DnD fan but it is getting kinda annoying to see that people they think that DnD = classic fantasy. DnD works well even with alien settings and is actually just a set of rules and ideas, not a setting. The fact that most DnD settings are Classic Fantasy is choice of campaign makers, not a DnD rule.

Oh, and a dragon appeared in The Elder Scrolls Adventures: Redguard. The lore also cofirms that dragons are part of TES universe... a important part of TES to the boot... So OP, where did you get the idea that dragons are not part of TES?


This :) 1st graphics aren't even related to gameplay and one does not limit the other and as already said dragons are a vital part of TES's lore.
User avatar
Ana
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:29 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:15 pm

OP made me laugh, literally. Thanks :goodjob:
User avatar
Lillian Cawfield
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:22 pm

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:48 pm

This is one game I will not be paying for,

Essence of rant in ten words.

Oh, just wanted to add that Morrowind was pretty much all brown and grey, with a tinge of green here and there. Much more monochromatic than Skyrim is looking.

Also, this.

Edit: And here's yet another thing that I'd like to add (something that's already mentioned by other posters, really). You've read a helluva lots of mentions on the Dragons existence in whole of The Elder Scrolls series (that is to say, if you even bother to read the in game books, which your post suggests the otherwise, m'afraid). The avatar for Akatosh and Alduin are supposedly a Dragon. Then you even had a chance to fought http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Daggerfall:Monsters#Dragonling in Daggerfall. The continent of Akavir (I'm sure you've heard it, hm?) literally translates to the "Dragon Lands". You fought a Red Dragon, http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Redguard:Retrieve_the_Soulgem#Point_M, in "Redguard". Heck, even the Imperial banner... you know: that symbol on the front cover of your Morrowind box... is a FREAKING DRAGON.
User avatar
Taylah Illies
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:13 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:18 pm

Sorry if I seem like a troll, but I put almost 4 months into the ideas and discussion forum for TES V and none of it was worth the devs time.

You really think you're the only one who can dish out ideas for the developers to use? If the minority say they want monster vultures and the majority say they want dragons, who do you think they'll consider putting in the game? And even so, Bethesda is the one developing the game so obviously they'll do what they see fit regardless of what we want. Besides, they do manage to create ideas on their own, they can't rely entirely upon what fans say, and if they did that, I'm sure each and every game they made would be inconsistent contradicting itself.
User avatar
lilmissparty
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:51 pm

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:52 am

Wait. So this guy is upset because in Skyrim the rocks are grey and the snow is white? Not sure I understand what specifically about the trailer has him so disappointed, other than the fact it appears to be running on a 360 or similar hardware.


Well, the rocks could be a bit more green/mossy, not only basalt exists. but last time I check snow is fairly white.

Or is it blue, I forgot.
User avatar
Solène We
 
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:04 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:20 pm

Because Bethesda releases a nice looking trailer and some screenshots before giving out all the gameplay details that means they're focusing on graphics? :rolleyes:
User avatar
Syaza Ramali
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:46 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:30 am

I find it rather ironic that people get upset about TES adding something like dragons. It just strikes me as odd, being most of the time people are up in arms about them taking something out. Dragons have always been in the lore, we've just only seen one of them so far. I mean...will the fact that dragons are flying around really make TES feal like any other rpg of its type out there? I guess I just don't see the corrilation.

Maybe they finally figured with the the tech they had they could pull off a good dragon. Maybe they always wanted to have dragons, but never felt they could do them justice. I don't think they kept a large beast out of the game just to be unique. Besides, the area's we've seen in the trailer look amazing while at the same time the combat we've seen looks brutal and more believable.
User avatar
Monique Cameron
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:30 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:12 pm

Because Bethesda releases a nice looking trailer and some screenshots before giving out all the gameplay details that means they're focusing on graphics? :rolleyes:


When was Bethesda not interested in Graphics?

Had I been playing something other than super mario in 1996 (or the DOOM and Quake dabbling) I think a game like daggerfall would have blown me out of the [censored]ing water. Quake looked marginally better but was not built on the same scale.


It's not like we're talking Crysis-tech-edge here, Skyrim is a good looking game but it's not *the* best looking game on the market. Just as Morrowind was not *the* best looking game on the market, and daggerfall was not *the* best looking game on the market, etc, as usual it will be the world and character diversity that sets it aside from other titles.
User avatar
Kayleigh Mcneil
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:32 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:55 pm

I find it rather ironic that people get upset about TES adding something like dragons. It just strikes me as odd, being most of the time people are up in arms about them taking something out. Dragons have always been in the lore, we've just only seen one of them so far. I mean...will the fact that dragons are flying around really make TES feal like any other rpg of its type out there? I guess I just don't see the corrilation.

Maybe they finally figured with the the tech they had they could pull off a good dragon. Maybe they always wanted to have dragons, but never felt they could do them justice. I don't think they kept a large beast out of the game just to be unique. Besides, the area's we've seen in the trailer look amazing while at the same time the combat we've seen looks brutal and more believable.


I remember a developer once saying that they waited till they could do dragons justice. That developer... was quite passionate on topic of dragons ;)

When was Bethesda not interested in Graphics?

Had I been playing something other than super mario in 1996 (or the DOOM and Quake dabbling) I think a game like daggerfall would have blown me out of the [censored] water. Quake looked marginally better but was not built on the same scale.


to be perfectly honest, all four TES games before Skyrim were incredible in terms of graphics (/for their time). MW was especially incredible: it was better looking then almost every game of that time... hell, it made them look 10 years older.

Technically, Skyrim is now so incredible. The art (which IMO is far more important anyway) and some small details makes it look better then it technically is. In the end, it is a game created for PS3 and X360 hardware, just like OB.
Check newest The Witcher 2 screenshots to see how a game of this age can look like.
User avatar
leni
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:58 pm

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:46 am

Since it's not Morrowind it must svck right? Seriously people, Skyrim isn't even out yet. Just because the game doesn't take place in alien like world doesn't mean it will svck. Give the game a chance! You haven't even played it, it's not even coming out for atleast seven months!
User avatar
Gavin boyce
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:19 pm

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:57 am

Way to fight fire with fire guys!
User avatar
sharon
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 4:59 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:34 am

OP made me laugh, literally. Thanks :goodjob:

The OP just prolonged your life with a few seconds if your to believe the myth behind laughing :thumbsup:
User avatar
Niisha
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:54 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:06 pm

I first heard that Skyrim is coming out a day ago, and have just now watched the trailer. Despite all the advice given over the past two or more years in the TES V Ideas and Discussion thread the Developers have chosen to go with a grey/black&white colour scheme, they have used creatures which are in every other game of this genre (dragons) and are focusing on graphics again (same mistake they made with oblivion). We all gave very nice ideas in the discussion thread and were repeatedly told that the developers were in fact reading what we said, when in truth we might as well have been pissing on a wall. I almost threw up when I saw the trailer.

This is one game I will not be paying for, and I hope the same is true for all who offered their time and effort to make a great game in the discussion thread and are just now realizing that the devs don't listen to what the people want. I will be eagerly waiting another 6 years for TES VI to come out though in the hope that gamesas will learn from it's last two failures and place the game in several provinces with less focus on graphics and more focus on good old fashion gameplay with an extreme other world feel.

Rant end.

Shhh.... did you hear that?.... lurking in the shadows?.... oh no!.... it can't be!... It's the dreaded...!!............ maaaaaaainstreeeeaaaaaammmm... (echoes all around) :ahhh:
User avatar
Pawel Platek
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 2:08 pm

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:24 pm

How did you miss the info about Skyrim - it was announced in December? :o

I understand what you're saying, and mostly agree, however, Elder Scrolls has taken a turn from fantasy game to Dungeons and Dragons with this latest game. I would have preferred to never see that happen. There is no excuse for putting dragons in a TES game (in my mind).

Then you need to dig into lore more. :shrug:


I hope you are right, and I hope they do it well, I am still a bit shocked and disappointed that they chose to go in this direction though, from Morrowind which was a great game set in an alien fantasy world to Oblivion which incorporated such creatures as wolves, deer, bears, horses and the usual D&D creatures (trolls, orcs and such) to Skyrim which at first glance looks like a hack and slash dragon fighting game. But, if they do it right then it is possible that all hope is not yet lost.


No offense but your opinion of "doing it right" vs. what I think, or what a 1000 other members think is "right" varies so much its laughable. And its what keeps these forums busy and chatty. :) But the only ones who know what is right in their world are the developers and story writers for the game. Your suggestions in a multi-year spanning thread of TES-V suggestions and ideas may be all well and good but that thread was never intended as anything but a good space for members to toss around ideas. Todd and others have said they read the forums and I would imagine that over time they have found some interesting posts or discussions. But I think they have a solid vision - and probably a longer term one - of the world they have created and expanded upon over the years.

On one thing I agree, becouse, even if Oblivion looked pretty for it's time, there wasn't that much of gameplay available outside of the main Quest.

I'd rather have twice the content of Oblivion in exchange for only slightly improved Morrowind graphics and content, but maybe that's just me?

Heh. So many people on this forum ignore the main quest in Oblivionand play through the interesting and lengthy other questlines.
User avatar
Charlotte Henderson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:37 pm

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:13 pm

Since it's not Morrowind it must svck right? Seriously people, Skyrim isn't even out yet. Just because the game doesn't take place in alien like world doesn't mean it will svck. Give the game a chance! You haven't even played it, it's not even coming out for atleast seven months!

*looks at avatar*
You're just used to these kinda of boring, snowy landscapes full of boring creatures and boring people who can hardly keep a conversation, and civil wars between empires and rebels, and bearded men who can literally shake the world with only their voices, and vikings and mead and... Wait, where was I going with this?
User avatar
Channing
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:05 pm

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:24 am

make the game feel more like morrowind


Ah, I see another "I want MW 2.0". Sorry I wasted my time here. /shrug

Skyrim looks awesome for many reasons, including all the ways it is "not" like MW and OB. I feel sorry for folks who have already ruined the game for themselves in their own mind, this game is going to be epic. :celebration:
User avatar
Jack Bryan
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:06 pm

Way to fight fire with fire guys!


We will crush your opinion a thousand fold! Keep it coming, guys; he's still twitchin'!
User avatar
Laura Wilson
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:57 pm

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:48 pm

Way to fight fire with fire guys!

We're fighting fires of insane rage with the dousing waters of common sense and reasonability.
User avatar
Bellismydesi
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:25 am

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:38 pm

Sorry if I seem like a troll, but I put almost 4 months into the ideas and discussion forum for TES V and none of it was worth the devs time.


you seem like you care, but have you done enything than watching that trailer, take a look through the GI website, there is tons of info there.

ps. constantly whining I want I want in the suggestion forums wo't get you anywhere
User avatar
ZzZz
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:56 pm

Post » Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:43 am

"they no lissen to what i wannn, i no buy game bethsduh is worz gaym devlper evurrr :("
me me me me, you have such great idea's, go make your own game, dazzle us with it.
User avatar
Keeley Stevens
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:04 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim