For example, I have never in any TES game used bow and arrows. They do not appeal to me.
Does that mean I would not care if they were removed?
No, I would care deeply.
First of all for all the people who very much enjoyed the feature, this is called empathy.
And secondly because I feel that a game that has lots and lots of things is better than a game with very few features.
Even if some of those features I never use, the removal would be indicative of a trend I am not fond of.
A trend we saw with Oblivion and now continued into the extreme with Skyrim, where it seems they went on a berserker rampage of removal.
" First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me."
(M. Niemoller)
Just beautiful. Thanks for helping me relocate this quote. I think it fits this Skyrim problem properly. Personally, I'm never a mage character, as I hate magic. But this does sadden me for all my fellow TES fans who won't be able to fully enjoy the game like the rest of us. Who knows, maybe one day they'll decide that combat is too "repetative".