Major bugs caused by v1.5!

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:05 am

Wow. Hello massive savegame BLOAT. :banghead:



I'm willing to bet that someone will come up with a workaround and that it won't be the only option. :shrug:
User avatar
Miragel Ginza
 
Posts: 3502
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:19 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:27 am

Right. Moving foward, you'll want to make new references persistent.


If this is positively the case, and I have not yet checked the new GECK update, but,

Unless the intent is to make mods that create exterior areas be expected to exist in .esm form and not .esp - - it seems best for the workflow to have the GECK automatically make objects being added to exterior cells in .esp files be persistant refs. Right now, for every piece you add, you have to click a checkbox in the item's edit window. Also, I have not seen a batch function for setting objects as persistant.

Also - - - there's the bright-white-skin-on-NPCs issue. It seems related. Unless adding new NPCs will be expected to only happen in .esm mods and not .esps, that's gonna wanna be looked at.
User avatar
Ashley Campos
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:03 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:37 am

That is not smart at all. If somebody, say, adds a base to the game, every little thing would need to be persistent: trees, rocks, wall, clutter, npcs, everything. Meaning horrible savegame bloat.
Multiply by the number of mods, and you get something unplayable.

Making things persistent is a horrible solution that shouldn't be needed.


I really, really hope Gstaff meant that just as a personal "yeah, you cna do that till we fix it" and not him passing along official word.
User avatar
Jaki Birch
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:16 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:27 am

I'm willing to bet that someone will come up with a workaround and that it won't be the only option. :shrug:

And how will we do that, seeing as modifying the exe is illegal, and that looks like the only way to do it?
User avatar
Assumptah George
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:43 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:42 am

I'm willing to bet that someone will come up with a workaround and that it won't be the only option. :shrug:


It's called patch downgrade. Or rebuilding everything into an esm (which still leaves navmeshes out, anyone knows a workaround for them on 1.5?).

It's a choice between paying you and getting borken steel support + achievements.... or having mods (which is far more content than any dlc you'll be able to create) and working vats, for free. guess what'll be the choice?
User avatar
Hayley Bristow
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 12:24 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:34 pm

It's called patch downgrade. Or rebuilding everything into an esm (which still leaves navmeshes out, anyone knows a workaround for them on 1.5?).

It's a choice between paying you and getting borken steel support + achievements.... or having mods (which is far more content than any dlc you'll be able to create) and working vats, for free. guess what'll be the choice?

From what I see, 1.5 has nothing to do with broken steel, besides achievements, so hopefully it will work with fakepatch. Achievement remover, here I come.
User avatar
He got the
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:19 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:29 pm

I'm willing to bet that someone will come up with a workaround and that it won't be the only option. :shrug:
Well, we have one. Move the DLC files to the data directory, and use the fake patch. But that's not right, or would it sound right to you to not use any kind of technical support patches the developer of a game delivers because they ruin one of the most basic selling points of their game on the particular platform?
User avatar
Bereket Fekadu
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:41 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:58 am

It's called patch downgrade. Or rebuilding everything into an esm (which still leaves navmeshes out, anyone knows a workaround for them on 1.5?).

It's a choice between paying you and getting borken steel support + achievements.... or having mods (which is far more content than any dlc you'll be able to create) and working vats, for free. guess what'll be the choice?


I think that an issue with navmeshes issue exists in 1.4 as well.... I have a big pile of symptoms here that are starting to come together and look like that.

I read something Quarn said to where there is some way to put a navmesh into an .esm that's different from anything I've tried. I want to try that sometime and see if I get a true, persistant, working navmesh out of it.
User avatar
Haley Cooper
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:30 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:28 am

It's a choice between paying you and getting borken steel support + achievements.... or having mods (which is far more content than any dlc you'll be able to create) and working vats, for free. guess what'll be the choice?


Usually I'm pretty easy going and try to sympathize with developers and cut them some slack because PC development is fraught with all sorts of issues. But this is a pretty fundamental problem and makes all the mods using external cells useless.

I was planning on getting Anchorage, The Pitt and Broken Steel all at once, loading up my favorite mods, and then launching a new game. But you're right - I'd rather have mods than the DLC's, so right now I'm not buying anything. I'm going on vacation for a couple of weeks in another week, so I'll wait until I get back to see what Bethesda does. But if the current situation is unchanged, I'll stick with the mods and Bethesda will have lost 3 DLC sales from me. That's the only way I know to make my voice heard.
User avatar
nath
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:34 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:49 pm

one of the most basic selling points of their game on the particular platform?

I'd say it's the top/only selling point. The thought of playing unmodded fallout/oblivion/morrowind makes me shudder.
User avatar
bimsy
 
Posts: 3541
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:04 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:10 am

Maybe they want all exterior-modifying mods to live as .esms instead of .esps.
User avatar
Vickytoria Vasquez
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:06 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:18 pm

I'm pretty sure it was an unintended byproduct of a modification they made to allow esms to modify exterior cells correctly
User avatar
patricia kris
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:04 am

Maybe they want all exterior-modifying mods to live as .esms instead of .esps.


Maybe so, but to do so after all these mods have been made is more than a bit disruptive.
User avatar
CHangohh BOyy
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:12 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:14 am

im getting crashes when saving and the only mod im using is the unofficial patch.
User avatar
Samantha Jane Adams
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 4:00 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:59 am

That's weird.

I uploaded a new version of my Rivet City Apartment with the dog set to persistent and that seems fine. However, I've had to uncheck Big Blue House, Top of the World, Hole in the Wall, Tenpenny Extension and a couple of my WIPs from my Data Files list because they add stuff to the exterior. I'll upload fixed versions (all ext. refs persistent) ASAP. (They shouldn't be too horrendous, since most only add minor additions such as pot plants to the exterior.)

However, since reverting to a previous save, without those mods (or any that affect exterior cells) I'm not getting any more crashes. By that, I mean that I played for an hour or so with the mods plugged in after installing version 1.5, got tons of crashes, went back to the last save before installing the patch and unchecked all the exterior-affecting mods, and then resumed playing with - touch wood - no issues.
User avatar
Andrew Lang
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:50 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:47 pm

im getting crashes when saving and the only mod im using is the unofficial patch.
...which is probably adding, moving, removing stuff to close gaps in the terrain or navmesh, all those things. Did not take a closer look at the readme, but I think I can almost guarantee it does. ^_^
User avatar
steve brewin
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:17 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:47 pm

Maybe so, but to do so after all these mods have been made is more than a bit disruptive.


If this is the way they meant for it to stay, I'll end up splitting Phalanx into an .esm and an .esp. The .esm will have world changes in it, including probably interior cells. I have a suspicion that navmesh is bugged-out in .esp files, no matter the cell type, and this includes versions prior to 1.5. Moving to .esm may be the cure for it. Phalanx will be alright with that part.

But that skin tone problem in .esp files really seems out of place. I'm not sure I see a good way around that one. At a minimum, it would ruin savegame compatibility to move Malcolm and Deisha into an .esm (I tested this).
User avatar
Cathrine Jack
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:29 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:27 am

If this is the way they meant for it to stay, I'll end up splitting Phalanx into an .esm and an .esp. The .esm will have world changes in it, including probably interior cells. I have a suspicion that navmesh is bugged-out in .esp files, no matter the cell type, and this includes versions prior to 1.5. Moving to .esm may be the cure for it. Phalanx will be alright with that part.

But that skin tone problem in .esp files really seems out of place. I'm not sure I see a good way around that one. At a minimum, it would ruin savegame compatibility to move Malcolm and Deisha into an .esm (I tested this).

Why even bother supporting 1.5? I'd say 90-100% of us will be using fakepatch now.
User avatar
Laura Simmonds
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:27 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:17 pm

Does anyone know if the patch runs fine with fook overhaul and xfo overhaul kit?
User avatar
stevie trent
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:24 am

I'm willing to bet that someone will come up with a workaround and that it won't be the only option. :shrug:

In other words the community has to clean up Bethesda's mess for the Nth time. :facepalm:
User avatar
Andrew
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:44 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:19 am

I have to agree with col here, there's really little reason to support patch 1.5 on mods. It breaks a lot and adds nothing, and if it ever gets fixed in a future patch, the changes to make the mod compatible with 1.5 would be useless and counter-productive (sort of like the 1.5 patch).
User avatar
GLOW...
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:40 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:29 pm

and is this fake patch comptable with the new dlc broken steel? and does fook overhaul and xfo overhaul have problems with the new patch?
User avatar
Add Me
 
Posts: 3486
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:21 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:24 am

Why even bother supporting 1.5? I'd say 90-100% of us will be using fakepatch now.


My own line-up of mods as Phalanx 0.96 is put together isn't killing me with 1.5 loaded. So, I'm kinda getting to have the good parts of what's in 1.5.

On the negative side - -

I have to do a fix involving a work-around for a different, weapon-dupe bug. This bug existed in 1.4 but seems to impact 1.5 harder than it did 1.4. Video on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMwve_xFG38 .

And then there's the skin color on Deisha. I'm gonna give it some time and see if bethesda fixes that. That one belongs working in an .esp imo. That seems plain broke with no good reason I can imagine to be left that way. http://www.finhosting.fi/~fallout/screenshots/RidiculousSkin.jpg .
User avatar
Lily Something
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:21 pm

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:51 am

I have to agree with col here, there's really little reason to support patch 1.5 on mods. It breaks a lot and adds nothing, and if it ever gets fixed in a future patch, the changes to make the mod compatible with 1.5 would be useless and counter-productive (sort of like the 1.5 patch).


I'm not gonna move anything to an .esm that wouldn't be easy to move back. And actually 1.5 adds nice stuff, I have a couple posts in this thread already as to how its working out for me.
User avatar
BlackaneseB
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:21 am

Post » Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:00 pm

And actually 1.5 adds nice stuff, I have a couple posts in this thread already as to how its working out for me.

Tell me about it... I use enclave commander a lot, and the follower upgrades are nice... I really hope fakepatch can remake them...
User avatar
vicki kitterman
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:58 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout 3