» Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:37 pm
Crimzin1, I never do this but you have a weird combination of a superiority complex and illiteracy. Whyyyyyyyy do you have to be so arrogant? I don't want to write this crap. This is probably the saddest thing I've ever done and the story isn't anywhere near worth this, but you're just too annoying to ignore.
You're asking for the EXACT amount of energy it requires to run? That's why you disagree? You didn't see any direct link to the flying machines and resources so it didn't happen, right? WRONG! It was stated several times that it takes a lot of power to fuel the Ceph. That includes there flying operations. It isn't declared untrue just because you don't see a visible "connection." That's almost as stupid as them reminding you time and again how resource effective the Ceph are, just in case.No, I'm asking how he knows how much power it uses. I don't remember anything in Crysis 1 about how they fly, or how much power they need to fly, only that they want power, not their consumption rate.
It isn't declared untrue just because you don't see a visible "connection." That's almost as stupid as them reminding you time and again how resource effective the Ceph are, just in case.
Seriously, if you can't read truthfully in the first place, don't keep going on as though you're onto something. I didn't say anything like that and yet here you go with random rambling nonsense which has nothing to do with anything anyone has ever said.
How is it a downgrade? Why is ridiculously bulky a reason why what he said not true? Oh, that's right, it isn't. Because the suit is weaker in strength and speed mode. Ever play the first game? Oh, right. You obviously didn't because then you'd be making sense.
Are the best fighters champion body builders? Are the best runners champion body builders? No. Being bulky has nothing to do with how fast you can run and the skinnier nanosuit 1.0 is stronger than the fatter 2.0. The fact is they changed the looks because they think it looks cooler and would appeal to more.
Notice how as tech advances, it ideally gets smaller but stronger or more powerful? I'd be fine with the nanosuit 2.0 trying to look cool if it was actually stronger than 1.0 but it isn't.
Firstly.. why the **** am I proving the suit size to not be a plot hole? Secondly... It's obvious it was upgraded. Why does it have to look identical? IT DOESN'T! It's an UPGRADE. How is it visually an upgrade? How does the fact that it looks like a fat suit mean it's an obvious upgrade? No one is saying it has to look identical. The original question was why is it trying to look so badass and tough when the original suit was stronger and faster. I feel like it's going to be useless anyway because you read selectively.
HUMAN or EARTH natural evolution is not the same as CEPH natural evolution. He's referring to adapting to the battle conditions. It's an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LOCATION! There doesn't need to be the same aliens attacking everywhere. They are obviously intelligent enough to realize it's more efficient to use foot soldiers. They are fighting in an urban environment again the US army. Not just a few squads of soldiers. The army. Flying squids were weak to high fire-rate weapons. Why would they fly around tons of humvees, atts, helicopters, and tanks? They all have .50 cal machine guns and gatling guns. They wouldn't. Especially when it's their weakness. They wouldn't. Exactly. They are fighting against the US army on the army's own terms. Pretty sure sending in infantry to deal with infantry, tanks, humvees, helicopters etc isn't the most efficient way to clear them out. I mean... What? If that were the case, the game would revolve around you killing all of the aliens one by one until you get to their leader. Not the spore. The spore was the most efficient way of clearing out the area. If they were intelligent they'd release the spore to declare war, not three years into it.
"Walking around in an awkward, slow exoskeleton with explosed jelly is so efficient, man! So efficient!! I'd know. I've played Call of Duty."
BTW, how is flying their weakness? Air drops are their sole way of responding to you throughout the game and it takes two or more helicopters + a lot of firepower to bring down the ship in the first act. Pretty sure they have air superiority. If you want to try to bring down a gunship of theirs with your rifle, go ahead. I'm sure it'd be incredibly effective. I'm also pretty sure tanks, humvees, helicopters etc are going to be more exposed to air forces than they are to infantry.
They had an endless supply of AMMO. Not energy. The MOAC transforms the air into a weapon. It isn't just a simple anolog rifle using gunpowder. How did you not realize that? Why did you even have to ask? "Herrderr I had an unlimited ammo gun!" Really?What are you talking about? Unlimited energy. The gun recharges on it's own. Forever as far as we know. That is unlimited energy. Jesus lol.
It makes total sense in relation to the question. He was explaining how the KPA got suits. The first question was how did they attain suits. No. You can't read. The original question was 'how were the nanosuits tests if the Koreans had them'. The idea to throw in Hargreave seems to him an afterthought.
I think he was always going to be involved from the start as the suits act weirdly whenever there is an alien presence nearby in most Crysis 1 cutscenes.
Hey you just explained logical reasoning as to why it's not a plot hole. If you're trying to sarcastically mock crystal clear logic, you're an idiot. Basically everything you've said so far has been idiotic, so I'll just assume the opposite to whatever you say is going to be correct... I am not even talking about plot holes. I'm talking about my thoughts on that guy's ideas. There are reading comprehension classes you can take. Just saying...
So you're just stating that it's not possible they're dead. Then rambling in defense saying it's an unknown unknown. Then you say the last time we saw them was on the ship that was destroyed. Even though, the rest of the world. Saw the clip where Prophet is revealing everything as well as Hargreave. They were.. Post-human warriors. So in all likelyhood, they are dead. It is possible that they're alive. The big question is.. Why does this matter? Answer: It doesn't. Crysis 2 is an end and a beginning to Prophet's story.
No, I'm saying it isn't necessarily right to say "they're died" when you don't know. You really shouldn't go for the internet badassery thing when you can't even read one post honestly without coming to your own conclusion on what the original post was saying, rather than what it was actually saying.
The last time we saw them was when they were heading back to the island to find Prophet. Prophet made it off the island, so we can assume there is a chance that Psycho and Nomad made it off the island too.
Post-human warrior =/= dead. It means a super soldier, which is also the name of the post-human difficulty on consoles. That is the relation, not 'post-death'. You think Hargreave was after dead people to win the war?
Worth it...