Malacath ent a daedra

Post » Tue May 08, 2012 10:57 am

Says who?

If he was truly an Aedra, he'd be difficult to corrupt. He's Et'ada, champion of Auri-el, and he did not give himself to Mundus. People need to be aware that 'Daedra' is a catch-all.
I'm pretty sure the devs said so during a community interview. Plus the very definition of a God is that they're creators. Daedra don't create things.

Oh and Boethiah denies that Daedra are Gods when u ask her/him about it in Skyrim.
User avatar
christelle047
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:50 pm

Post » Mon May 07, 2012 11:31 pm

The process Trinimac under went with Boethia was enough to "taint" him with that which makes the Daedra....Daedra, weather it be Purity, or sense what seperates the Et'ada are of Blood and intent, Trinimac whom once being selfless and cared for the weak, the pure and feeble and was finite has become a Dark Selfish being who dispises weakness and has become the antithesis of what he once was. I think thats enough to qualify him as a Daedra.

the others are just butthurt because he wasn't there in the beginning, and yeah I'd look down on my Spiritual bro too if he was the result of my sisters refuse.
User avatar
Noely Ulloa
 
Posts: 3596
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 1:33 am

Post » Mon May 07, 2012 11:40 pm

I'm pretty sure the devs said so during a community interview. Plus the very definition of a God is that they're creators. Daedra don't create things.

Oh and Boethiah denies that Daedra are Gods when u ask her/him about it in Skyrim.

Since when? God as in the capital G god doens't really apply to anything other then the God-Head (and even then) in the TES universe. Daedric Princes created their realms and everything within them, the only difference between a daedra and an aedra is that the aedra gaves themselves up in a community effort of sorts whereas the daedra did not and built their own worlds.
User avatar
Tracey Duncan
 
Posts: 3299
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:32 am

Previous

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion