I think Medal of Honor did modern warfare better than the Call of duty franchise did, and it is essentially the godfather of WW2 FPS

Call of Duty, by a longshot

Medal of Honor, it was actually fun.

EDIT: Actually, Modern Combat goes to Call of Duty, WW2 is MoH's though.

Both svck, get Red Orchestra on Steam if you want to play a good WWII game. Sure the graphics svck but it will make you think before you run around a wall spraying bullets in all directions.

Where's the "neither" option?

Well MOH use to be the king of Shooters until COD took over.

Agreed, I wasnt super impressed with the new MoH but Frontline and Rising Sun are the games I was raised on so the nostalgia effect makes them the winner for me

Airborn was also pretty decent, kind of underrated IMO.

MOHAAS is the best online FPS game ever made. But since then, the series has gone way down hill. COD on the other hand has gone from meh to awesome and is now back at meh.

I like Call of Duty a bit better, just because they tried to do something interesting with the story.

The obvious downfall of it is that they're barely changed their game at all since Call of Duty 4 came out.

That's that little red 'x' in the top right corner of this window :thumbsup:

THIS! and sometime this year Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad will be released.

I actually loved the modern Medal of Honor game more than any CoD game. The online modes are tons of fun.

And the classic WW2 MOH games are just classics.

I like MOH purely because it didn't seem to attract the plebs that COD does now.

I'll have to pick COD but I'm not a big fan of either of these 2 games.

Who was best out of Blur and Oasis. Supergrass of course.

Which is best out of COD and Medal of Honour? Operation Flashpoint.

I grew up on MoH, but I think Call of Duty has tooken over the FPS market now. I don't play either much now though.

Medal of Honor.

Personally, I think Rabbit's story is better than that of CoD's main characters. Also, the online is more tactical; less spraying and camping.

Medal Of Honor is the king of the WWII FPS genre. CoD 4 is king of the Modern warfare genre and the new Medal Of Honor beats out all Call Of Duty games afterwards.

I don't think either are particularly good, but in my opinion CoD beats MoH by a lot.

The last games in either series that I've played were Medal of Honor: Frontline and Call of Duty 4, and overall I'd say I preferred Call of Duty. The original on PC was great and Call of Duty 2 is among my top five FPS. I didn't care for Call of Duty 3 or World at War at all, and Call of Duty 4's appeal was the modern setting, which has since been driven into the ground at a much faster rate than World War II ever could have been.

It didn't look like Medal of Honor's transition to a modern setting did much that hasn't been done to death in the past couple of years, though I still have fond memories of Underground and Frontline.

Medal of honor by a long shot.


not as good as allied assault but better than CoD.

Call of Duty, at least as far as online goes.