Meh mammoth prictue : V

» Thu May 19, 2011 5:32 am

Am i the only one that thinks the Mammoth pic is way outdated?

I mean the bushes look so almost, like a decade old.

» Thu May 19, 2011 9:05 am

Am i the only one that thinks the Mammoth pic is way outdated?

I mean the bushes look so almost, like a decade old.

Ummm....I could care less about bushes. I think it's just the giant and the mammoths that matter.

» Thu May 19, 2011 11:33 am

Ummm....I could care less about bushes. I think it's just the giant and the mammoths that matter.

Same here, glad they went generic instead of being creative.

» Thu May 19, 2011 4:06 am

hmm well bushes are part of the immersion and look kinda old ( I'm ok with it) but we had the same shape last decade

» Thu May 19, 2011 2:52 am

For being on the same hardware as oblivions, it looks amazing imo. People seem to expect next gen graphics when we are not even on next gen hardware yet.

» Wed May 18, 2011 10:59 pm

Ummm....I could care less about bushes. I think it's just the giant and the mammoths that matter.

Still mammoth looks way outdated? i don't care much about graphicks in an RPG but still, looks rly bad even if its on xbox360

» Thu May 19, 2011 8:37 am

Looks good to me, 4 tusks means its a double mammoth.

Some people will never be satisfied.

» Thu May 19, 2011 6:14 am

Am i the only one that thinks the Mammoth pic is way outdated?

I mean the bushes look so almost, like a decade old.

YES! I said this on the other thread! I love Skyrim...but the grass looks terrible. And the trees aren't like they were in the trailer or other pics! I had a terrible dejavue of the grass in Oblivion when I saw that pic!

» Thu May 19, 2011 8:00 am

Well it's an image. I'll wait till I see them in a video/in game before I judge. It is a screenshot from the 360 version after all, so I'm not expecting to be blown out of the water with anything I see until PC stuff(or the game itself) is released.

» Thu May 19, 2011 5:02 am

The shrubbery looks perfectly fine, and no less detailed than any shrubbery this side of The Witcher 2. Everything will look crisper when you're playting it on your TV/monitor as well.

» Wed May 18, 2011 8:50 pm

Ummm....I could care less about bushes. I think it's just the giant and the mammoths that matter.

At this point I fully. Agree I am glad they have both it sounds epic. Runing arround rolling shooting arrows and tossing javalins at the giant anyone then creating a transport bissness with his mamoths?

» Thu May 19, 2011 7:52 am

looks pretty good to me, could always be better but :shrug:

» Thu May 19, 2011 4:17 am

I think what bothers me most about the mammoth picture is that the shadow from the closest mammoth isn't casting on the actual grass. That was a feature in Oblivion, so it's a bit ironic that Skyrim has more shadows everywhere, but they aren't cast on the grass like they are in Oblivion.

» Thu May 19, 2011 10:33 am

Remember, 2005 hardware.

» Thu May 19, 2011 9:31 am

pc players will never be pleased and if they are pleased odds are it will be at console players expense not just the lacking of a couple fine details but due to the lack of a game to play in order to please pc players odds are it will need crysis 1 graphics which means only the best computers can play it and console players wont be able to play it

» Thu May 19, 2011 8:57 am

WHAT MAMMOTH PIC?!! Did I miss a set of screenshots?! Is that possible?

Thanks.

» Thu May 19, 2011 8:22 am

I don't mind outdated graphix but that mammoth pic is prty pathetic :sadvaultboy:

» Wed May 18, 2011 10:54 pm

You're posting a thread instead of posting a comment in http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1197620-new-screens-iii/

There really was no need to open another thread for it... there's an actual screenshot thread that focuses on only 2 screenshots. You don't need another one.

» Wed May 18, 2011 8:41 pm

I've now determined the people in this forum are literally impossible to please. :bonk:

» Thu May 19, 2011 9:32 am

I don't mind outdated graphix but that mammoth pic is prty pathetic :sadvaultboy:

just wait to see it fully animated, it will look so much better imo, not that i think it looks bad.

» Thu May 19, 2011 3:37 am

I've now determined the people in this forum are literally impossible to please. :bonk:

Becouse the pic is taken from a decade old engine? i agree

Hopefully a great PC setup will make up for it :foodndrink:

» Thu May 19, 2011 3:23 am

I've now determined the people in this forum are literally impossible to please. :bonk:

This. I think this pic looks great. I could look at it for hours

» Thu May 19, 2011 8:19 am

I've now determined the people in this forum are literally impossible to please. :bonk:

No, we're pleased with everything, if we point out something we don't like,. it means that's the ONLY thing we don't like. so we actually love it. That's the way it is for me anyways.

On that note, the mammoths fur? Anybody else think that's meh, even for 360 shot?

» Thu May 19, 2011 9:36 am

I've now determined the people in this forum are literally impossible to please. :bonk:

Really.

But whats this 2005 hardware nonsense? They have an entire new engine, and, no offense OP, but you seem like a rather shallow person. I think the graphics look great. You graphic people, i don't know... you guys are just so damn... hard... to appease...

:facepalm:

» Thu May 19, 2011 6:40 am

YES! I said this on the other thread! I love Skyrim...but the grass looks terrible. And the trees aren't like they were in the trailer or other pics! I had a terrible deja vu of the grass in Oblivion when I saw that pic!

Me too.

As for the mammoth, honestly, the one in FO3 looks better. They could've just rigged that one..