A user of the L&L mod came across an interesting situation: he was using the romance mod, the follow plugin, my L&L add-on, Fliggerty's integration patch, and TESTool's merged dialog plugin. He was having issues with the "Care for a dalliance" topic showing - he had to remove TESTool's plugin to get it to work properly. I thought this might be something to add to the next rule update. Also, I don't remember if I mentioned this or not, but the load order for this situation would be: romance mod->follow add-on->either my add-on or Mr. C's original mod->Fliggerty's integration patch.
Well, there is already a general rule that warns against using merged dialogs already, since it's a well-known problem. Do you think that is sufficient? Was this user already using mlox and ignoring that advice for some particular reason? Or had they not tried mlox yet, and had not seen that warning? (Or did mlox make an oops and not give the warning?)
Here's the load order that mlox already knows (you were the source!), that looks like what you want, isn't it?
[Order]
Romance_v37EV.esp
Romance_Follow_v10EV.esp
Mr Cellophane's Lovers and Legends V0.esp
L&L Addon.esp
L&L_TRM_patch.esp
(The [Order] list does not mandate that a plugin exists, just that if it does exist, then it should be in the given order).