Morality of werewolf

Post » Mon Aug 10, 2015 12:10 am

Would

1) lawful good

2) good neutral

character become a werewolf?

I wouldnt become one, but companions seem the only "warrior" fraction (with repeatable quests to train your character and get some gold)

Dawnguard is good, but i need more money, also with companions you can go dragon hunting.

Blades are cool, but i dont want to go in final quests of main story yet.

User avatar
anna ley
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:04 am

Post » Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:56 am

sure, lycanism is a curse but it can be used for good as long as you aren't munching on people.

User avatar
Laura Wilson
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:57 pm

Post » Mon Aug 10, 2015 12:45 pm

One of the werewolf perks added by the Dawnguard DLC lets you feed on animals instead of humans. This could be useful for roleplaying a good werewolf.

User avatar
sam westover
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:00 pm

Post » Mon Aug 10, 2015 4:56 am

Do you think Kodlak was an evil werewolf? Or Farkas? Vilkas?

You don't really have to be evil to be a werewolf.

User avatar
Sudah mati ini Keparat
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:14 pm

Post » Mon Aug 10, 2015 5:30 am

^^^ this. My first werewolf only character did Companions only far enough along to get the disease then left them. He was a mercenary after , that would "do the jobs" as a werewolf to "feed his hunger" until such a time as he got the perk to feed on animals. After that, he only hunted animals, mainly other predators.

User avatar
Ryan Lutz
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:39 pm


Return to V - Skyrim