Also, you say that Uriel Septim III was so beloved by the people that they burned him alive in his carriage?!
Sorry, that was meant to be sarcastic.
Mannimarco is just a sociopath. There really is no justification for making me risk my life just to have a chat. And by the way, if that zombie was a test, then what was killing half the things in his lair just to deliver a letter? A warm-up? That zombie was jackassery. He already knew I could kill his undead minions.
I’m having a little bit of trouble reconciling this view of the King of Worms based on the fact that he made you jump through a few hoops to get what you wanted. By that same logic, Hasphat Antabolis at the Balmora Fighter’s Guild is a sociopath because he made you retrieve the Dwemer Puzzle Box.
It is inconsistent to paint this picture of Mannimarco as an unabashed sociopath while also acknowledging that no less a dignitary than Queen Barenziah herself would seek his aid in the arranged wedding of her only daughter to the King of Firsthold.
I personally think they are the same person, post-Dragon Break. Or, more precisely, the Mannimarco in Oblivion is an avatar of the King of Worms. I know that it's been said that the Jills extracted him following the Dragon Break, but given the Necromancer's Moon (which to be fair wasn't very well known) and the fact that both Mannimarco and his underlings mention him having ascended post-Dragon Break, I think I have the right to be skeptical.
I have to say that I am leaning toward this opinion too. As I understand it, and please correct me if I am wrong, during the Dragon Break Mannimarco received the Totem of Tiber Septim and gained control of Numidium. He was then able to use Mantella to ascend into Aetherius where he established himself as a god made manifest by the Necromancer’s Moon. However, Akatosh repaired the effect of the Dragon Break and cast Mannimarco back to the mortal realm. Since the Necromancer’s Moon still exists we can imply that Akatosh is either
a) somehow limited in the amount of damage that he could repair, or
B) unwilling to set everything on Nirn back to the way it was.
Personally, I think (a) makes more sense, at least in the way that it mirrors the fact that Azura could punish the Chimer for the Tribunal’s treachery in using the tools to achieve apotheosis, but she couldn’t reverse the effects on the Tribunal itself (she couldn’t un-deify them).
Still. The Fighters' Guild had no right to kill of competition. They may've been brutal, but the people liked them more so they got contracts. The Fighters' Guild butchered them without justification.
The 'Fighter’s Guild' didn’t kill anyone. Modryn Oreyn repeatedly warned the Guildmaster about the threat posed by the Blackwood Company, and was just as repeatedly rebuffed. Even after the murder of the Guildmaster’s own son at the hands of the Blackwood Company, the Guildmaster refused to act against them. Instead, she expelled Modryn Oreyn from the Guild. Acting without Guild sanction,
Oreyn resolved to take retribution for his dishonored (former) Guild.