I would rather shoot my self if they make it require constant connection than buy the game.
or I will ask my evil eye patched friends to lend a helping hand, though I loath such a possibility.
edit: steam can go frak itself, put a game key thingy inside and let that be confirmed online for DLs and stuff, problem solved
piracy is here to stay stop trying to use [censored] solutions for things that have no solution, its like trying to stop earthquakes and solar flares, just make the fans happy and we will defend you from piracy by actually buying the game.
Exactly. I have yet to see any proof whatsoever that DRMs actually reduce piracy. On the contrary, they may increase piracy.
I also agree with Benrahir's point that "the scene" may have changed little. Serial keys have been used for years. I am not aware of any evidence that (i) they have become less effecvtive at reducing game theft; (ii) that there has been an actual increase in the incidence of game theft that would warrant more intrusive and restrivtive forms of copyright protection; or (iv) actual proof that something like Steam or various other admittedly worse forms of DRM, are any more effective at reducing shrinkage resulting from game theft.
I want what is best for gaming, and to me that means, helping the publishers to make a good living from it. I have no desire to rip them off or get the games for cheaper; the better a living they make, the better the games we get. I want to support them in their efforts to protect their copyrights, I really, REALLY do.
But until I see solid evidence that addresses all of these points, I cannot support the idea that Steam or other even worse DRMs either are great, should be accepted as being inevitable, or are truly a boon to the gaming culture. Prove it to me, that you really need to make these impositions on me, or I won't buy your product; other publishers do not seem to need to make such impositions on me, so I will just buy their games instead.