i have a :
fx 8350
8 gb ram gskill 1600
GTX 980
And having low fps in urban places like Lexington..
the fun thing is i can put all in medium and all in ultra and i get same fps ?!
i have a :
fx 8350
8 gb ram gskill 1600
GTX 980
And having low fps in urban places like Lexington..
the fun thing is i can put all in medium and all in ultra and i get same fps ?!
GTX 970 MSI Gaming edition
16GB
Some i7-CPU with 4.0ghz K4770 or something like that
Running on ultra with 50-60fps except for a few areas mid-boston, usually when looking south-west.
Its your CPU causing it to choke. Here's a processor review for the game. My i5-4690k gets 80% better FPS than your FX-8350 in Boston.
https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&prev=search&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=pl&u=http://pclab.pl/art66856-16.html&usg=ALkJrhhuSMEtqz94WZmqHWYAfX8xvOLNDg
Hopefully they will be able to massage the game with a patch down the road, but your processor is always going to hold you back to an extent. It did the exact same thing in Skyrim, but the game wasn't as demanding so you could still keep a decent FPS with an AMD processor in CPU intensive areas. That's not the case now.
Sounds like that's exactly what's going on. I've got an i5-4570 (a fair bit faster than yours) matched with a GTX 760 (significantly slower than yours) and 8GB of ram and I'm getting literally no slowdown anywhere with most things on high and max @ 1920 x 1200. In fact I think the only thing I've set to medium is Godrays. Simple fact is you've got a GPU that can't deliver because it's anchored to a significantly weaker CPU. In a resource-eating monster like a 64bit open world RPG that's going to tell even more than usual. A lot of PC gamers are unaware of just how much bottle-necking will impact their performance and you've got a big discrepancy there.