I understand where your coming from, but even though obsidian is restricted certain options wouldnt Bethesda have to make acceptions because they are the ones who let obsidian take over in the first place? I don't understand why Bethesda let obsidian even take it back in the first place. Bethesda is the reason fallout is what it is today as you can tell by fallout 3. Plus on top of all of this it pretty much seems like fallout new Vegas is almost the exact same design as fallout 3. It seems like Bethesda just gave obsidian the tools to make their game and left it alone. Was that because they wanted to get started on elder scrolls skyrim. To make it twice the game that oblivion was?
I know I have alot to say but I'm just ceurious that's all.
Please write back!
Maybe making acceptions is a good point , i guess its a heavy task for a developer too make a game bounded by restriction so i have mixed emotion with Vegas altrou is different too atmosfhere and other things that i would have prefered too be more dark and sober i cant really blame Obsidian for what they did it was technicaly a good game if it is for 80% bugfree.
So was it an good idea too gave it back.. i dont know what i do know is that it will be more difficult for bethesda once they make a new game that will be totaly different too Vegas style because fans of Vegas want too see a more lighten style wile fans of fallout 3 prefer the darker side atleast thats what i think , maybe they
should let Obsidian take over instead of making unwanted stir among fans i hope i formulate myself a bit understandeble way.
anyway good day too you ill go play fallout now