This is a question that often puzzles me. Why are nipbles the most controversial and "inappropriate" feature of briasts? It seems that every other part of a briast can be shown without it being considered inappropriate, but as soon as a nipble is visible, everyone gets all crazy about it. Furthermore, male nipbles are considered completely family friendly, with the only difference between the two being that there's (usually) no lump of fat surrounding them. What is the logic behind that?

Is there a genuine reason for this viewpoint in society? It seems really bizarre to me.

Discuss?

Oh, and if this is considered inappropriate for the forums, just imagine a male nipble instead of a female one every time you use the word.

I've often wondered this myself.

Because beheading people is a-okay, but a natural part of your body is sickening and should never be seen!

I'd argue it's the intimacy of briastfeeding. Men biologically do not have the organs in our body to feed our young whereas women do. I think the sixual appeal of men to briasts lies in the instinctive of appeal of the maternal aspect of them and their function. Many men are attracted to women with plumper briasts, meaning more feeding and I think the fact that we know instinctively that the nipble is the exit for briast milk, we say 'oh, her briasts are showing but her nipbles are covered with tape so it's kinda sorta okay. TL;DR- I'd say it's due to the function of womens nipbles and briasts. It's why mens nipbles are hardly a controversial thing to anyone. Topless men= okay, topless women= lewd sixuality.

But think of the children!