seriously the way this game was designed is terrible man!

Absolutely terrible, it's like someone new to FPS multiplayer designed this game.

Seriously, after a match or during a match, you can't even add players you've met online to your friends list...what kind of a bull is this!?

No lobby, no server. It says Free Play and you can customise your gametype, what customs? all you do is chose from preset settings man!

The worst of all is the campaign, terrible!
There's no actual deep storyline involve, no emotion, no character development, no backstory nothing NADA!
All we know is that bunch of mopets are fighting to save the Ark and others to escape.

The game is based around team objectives, like Battlefield & Killzone 3....so what? what other gametypes are there?
none, and because of this it makes the game get boring so fast!


7/10 man....I mean it plays like Battlefield with the team tactic and all but the game gets boring so fast because of the limitation.
I can't even tell who is a bot and who is human. Some humans will have green bar next to their name while others would have icon indication suggesting they are bots. So if they are bots, why do I see speaker mic coming out of the icon?

...What is this........I don't even....=|

Game seems fine to me, you want a good story go pick up a Twilight novel

Stop basing all your FPS on COD and you would reallize this is the best game ver (not ever pac man wins) and the campaing does have a story either your pissed and want to leave or your pissed and being forced to stay. then you say its and objective based game and ask for other game types. i understand more objectives but tdm would require a kill meter type thing and that would get annoing seeing people with 50+ kills in objective. And you dont need a lobby this is not COD you vote for a map and play it. Also stop being lazy and go to recent player to add them. also you can view someones gamercard during and after match on xbox.

Also this game is worth more that what ypu paid you should go to where you bought it and give them $20 more

He didn't base it at all on COD at all also this game definitely was not worth what I paid for it they promised a deep narrative driven story which they failed to deliver, getting into a match with other human players takes way to long and to top it off once you do the lag is so bad you have to look for another game, also the defending team starts right on top of objectives I believe that to be a little unfair I know the game is supposed to difficult but when you take out half a team on an objective and they are right on top of you within seconds how are you supposed to get anything accomplished.

please let us know where you got your degree in video game design... oh wait you dont have one hmmmm... well than i guess you should just not talk about development of games.

I know I'm feeding right into what I'm about to say, but I need to say it anyway. Why feed into this obvious troll attempt? Those of us who enjoy the game, even with it's shortcomings, know this kind of thread when we see it. Instead of feeding the trolls, leave these kinds of threads unanswered so that the worth while threads are bumped, and posts like this one get lost in the backpages.

1st he most likely was like everyone that plaid cod then came to this and did base his thoughts on it
2nd. Most games lag at the begginning it hasnt been out for a week yet so dont complaing about lag when you play most fps and you still get laggy games
3rd. how is defending team spawning closer - ontop of objective unfair they need to set up so they dont lose, do you want attacking eam to spawn there?
4th if you want somethign accomplished get some skills and learn to bash through defense and exploit weak spots.

I have skill thank you very much and I'd be glad to prove it if you have a PS3 and it would make more sense to me to have both teams be an equal distance from the objective.

Oh that's right, because consumers need professional degrees in order to determine whether or not something isn't up to standards. (Not to mention the giant fallacy you just brought up since by your logic you have no right to defend a game because you don't have a degree either. Yeah, we can play that game too.)

Hardly, is this your first objective based game? In BFBC, the defending team spawned right on top of the objectives, so did they in quake wars, etc. Hell, even in COD demolition, the defending team spawns closer. Guess all these hugely successful games got it wrong? Sorry, but I feel like your close to alone on this.

It's unfortunate you didn't enjoy the game, it's not for everyone. I would love some more content and such, it's acceptable for now though.

Actually it Is aequal part away you are just trying to make the game seem worse then it actually is

No this is not my first objective based game and I am only saying this because the enemy A.I. is ridiculous and your team refuses to back you up I have no trouble with that playing against human players.

Now that wouldn't really make sense to change the maps for the purpose of singleplayer on a game that will predominantly be played online will it?

@OP - you might want to go find a copy of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, play it, and tell us what you think? It's about 8 years old now, and you can download it for free, and it's still got an active online community. It's made by THE SAME PEOPLE as Brink, so if you're trying to claim they're new to FPS games, you're an idiot - THEY are the kings of objective-based class-based FPS games.

It was a nice try until you called that into question though... you know, that first sentence? Yeah, everything before that was a good effort.

Also:

Fixed that for you. (Don't try to tell me they're about vampires. They're REALLY not. Not BAD stories, but... the author seems a little confused about the nature of her characters)

7/10 or 7.5/10 seems about right.

Your complaining on the "Brink" forums about why brink is bad, even though there all valid reasons...its still suicide.