What makes you think the government is going to pack you in large numbers? Where is that ever stated as a goal?
Thats the problem, you're automatically assuming the government is going to tell you to do something that will get you killed.
And martial law is better than no law at all......
I am not assuming that they are telling me somthing thats going to get me killed, im just not excluding that possibity, either.
I was in thei military. i know how things work :shrug:
its not difficult to think of scenarios that require people being herded together.
they wouldnt want people looting and rioting
they would want to possibly pool resources including services that people may be experieicned with (medical and so on)
Thay might want to find out if people are moving contaminated materials, deliberately or in-deliberately
If an evacuation is to occour, they would want to try and control it, so it is not complete chaos.
tell me why they wouldn't try to consolidate people.
So that makes it the government's fault?
in some scenarios yes, it would directly be their fault.
in others it would be their fault for not being able to gather enough intel
in other cases for not being able to diffuse the situation diplomatically before it became a nuclear war
i think it is a very rare case where a random madman can get a nuke wihout anyone in the international intel community knowing about it.
dont forget, our governments are supposed to be representatives of us on the international stage.
if another country is hostile towards us, it is almost assuredly because of the perception of our government.
religion is anotehr possibility that i wont rule out, but i would defer to the intel scenario in this instance
lets ask another question.
What circumstnaces that the government had no part in would lead to a nuclear war?
Im not out to loot, riot, or do anyone harm..
i just perfer take my own chances in limited numbers, where i know me and mine have a voice and a plan, as opposed to being lost in an endless sea of people that dont know whats going on and are not afforded individual voices as a result.