Holy... No. The Witcher 3 is absolutely juvenile in this regard.

That's because the eastern audience lean towards character development more than anything else

Amen.

LOL isnt well implement, is just there to be exploit for 15 year old virgins that never see boobs. Lol some of the six scenes of the game are just for that six, 0 relevance to the plot.

I would rather see more weapons and armor parts, rather than having a dlc or update where I can see my characters dike, or someone's [censored].

Slavery involves sentient ghouls(including ghoul children), not just synths.

Edit: Leave this to mods, I'd rather they not waste time on six scenes that add nothing to the game really.

I'm 38, gay and I disagree. It has nothing to do with immaturity or wanting to see boobs.

It's always functional to the character. Geralt is a man. He struggles to make ends meet. He's alone in a hostile world where people look down on mutants like him, even though they rely on him when something dangerous happens. Sometimes he finds some temporary comfort in the arms of a woman.

This is especially well done when he goes to visit a prosttute. You can see by his reaction that he is dissapointed when she shows him the door afterwards. He would rather have stayed a bit and cuddled, pretended to have found some human interaction. But he doesn't get that when he pays for it.

It's always relevant to paint the picture of the man that Geralt is.

There's a mod for that...

...

Oh yeah huh...And if you happened to barge into a room in an Inn, you'd catch a woman naked. Or if you took all the armor off a female character.

Eh, who knows the why. Maybe they just decided that full six and nudity wasn't gonna be on the table.

LOL i guess u never play Witcher 1 or 2 where u could nail everything that move. The Witcher game exploit six just as something extra to their game since no much other do it.

It was a different time and Daggerfall was made for a very different audience than Skyrim or FO4.

But a table is the best place to have six! *rim shot*

When were six scenes mentioned?

six scenes =/= nudity.

Nudity =/= six scenes.

Those people raiders string up? Wouldn't it make you hate them more had they been stripped of their clothing and then mutilated? And we're not just asking to see Piper's [censored]. Nudity would add to an overall mature feel of the game. As would slavery and other mature topics that Bethesda seems scared of.

Edit: I don't even want to be able to take off all the clothes of men/women and see their genitals. They should have underwear on, but in certain contexts, nudity would be welcome.

It should only include nudity if it includes all body types, sizes and forms in all stages of old age.

But not just for the sake of sixy young bodies.

Bethesda isn't scared of nudity, they see it as unnecessary thing to have in their games thats all.

Keyword: seems. They've been shying away from those topics for a while now, considering how lite this game is.

Precisely. I agree.

I simply cannot think of a single good reason to include graphic six and nudity in Fallout or The Elder Scrolls.

To be more "mature" (read: LOL SO EDGY)?

Not a good reason.

To be "controversial" and therefore cool?

Not a good reason.

To provide "fanservice"?

DEFINATELY not a good reason.

I simply can't think of a scenario where this wouldn't be a waste of the dev's time.

Edit: Also, to people saying they removed slavery, um, no. It's kind of central to the game's plot, you know?

It's mainly to be realistic, not edgy.

Also we're not talking about six scenes.

Edit: As for your slavery comment, not really. It's more "are synths human?" To me, they're not slaves at all. They're abominations. Has nothing to do with slavery.

The Duke Nukem era of gaming. Where PC games were promoted as edgy and PC was the advlt gaming platform. Ahhhh the 90's...

Well said - Also remember that Geralt struggles with emotions given the transformation of becoming a Witcher strip the subject of all emotions

Anyone ever watch the post-apocalyptic television series, Jeremiah? There were things about that show that I think did a good job of putting thought into what a post-apocalyptic world would be like. Including nudity.

You say "realistic", but I honestly see that as another way of saying the game needs a bunch of shocking content for the sake of being shocking because hey "It happens in the real world!!!" right? Also, I've never seen any WRPG handle this well.

And yeah, some people in here are talking about six scenes.

Isn't that the definition of realistic? O.o

Stuff that happens... uh... realistically.

If you aren't talking about having nudity in six scenes(the only place I can think of where it would be necessary)Then where would nudity be needed and be realistic at the same time.

I already said.

Fixed for ya.

If you're going to do a comparison, do yourself a favor and don't be so overtly biased about it that you flat-out ignore most of the issue.