» Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:46 am
@Borss, that was with 2560x1600 resolution, which is why his FPS were only at 49.
Still, it is horrible that Crytek has not given us PC gamers DX11 yet, and very awkward that Nvidia is showboating a DX11 card on a DX9 game. Sure, it may be the best damn DX9 game out there by a long shot as far as graphics go, but why the hell am I playing DX9 on Crysis 2 when Crysis (4 years ago) was DX10? It's pretty sad, and very upsetting. While it may not be a console port, is is most definitely 'consolized'. What they did to their true fanbase was pretty much slap us in the face and say "**** you, we're going where the money is!".
I think this game is great, gameplay wise, but it's hard to get over what they did to their loyal fanbase for consoles. People will still ask "Can it run crysis?", instead of "Can it run crysis 2?", because Cryengine 3 was a downgrade in many aspects on the graphical level.