Obsidian should make the Skyrim DLC.

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:35 pm

Just take Oblivion and Morrowind for example, I mean horse armor, an island where you mindlessly fight a thousand skeletons and nothing else, and random player houses. I would say Bethesda does not know how to make proper DLC.

Somehow, I don't believe you've played their expansion packs. What about Point Lookout or Broken Steel for Fallout 3?

You are saying that Dead Money and Old World Blues were better than Knights of the Nine and Shivering Isles?

If so... :facepalm:
User avatar
Minako
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:50 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:36 pm

No. That's all that need be said.
User avatar
Michelle davies
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:59 am

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:44 am

I hated Obsidian's DLC's for Fallout... And Obsidian doesn't know Elder Scrolls like Bethesda does.. Thats like having Infinity Ward making Skyrims DLC's...


Also Obsidian is the buggiest developer ever..
User avatar
Markie Mark
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:24 am

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:36 pm

Somehow, I don't believe you've played their expansion packs. What about Point Lookout or Broken Steel for Fallout 3?


If so... :facepalm:

Broken Steel was the biggest ripoff in FO DLC history. they added it because a bunch of TES players could not stand the game ending. I am sorry but that is the truth, no old school FO fans wanted it (other than for the level raise which was the only good thing about it). As I have said I like Point Lookout but one good DLC does not outweigh 4medicor-avaerage DLCs expecially when NV has 4 amazing DLCs.
User avatar
Brian LeHury
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 6:54 am

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:07 pm

Hmmmm....I smell a certain “creature”.

Stop feeding it.
User avatar
Hazel Sian ogden
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:10 am

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 3:22 pm

I hated Obsidian's DLC's for Fallout... And Obsidian doesn't know Elder Scrolls like Bethesda does.. Thats like having Infinity Ward making Skyrims DLC's...

or its like having Bethesda make a FO, oh wait... The point is just because theu never did it beofre does not mean they can't. And you are entiled to your opinion but I don't see how anyone can "hate" all NV DLC, especially since they were so varried.
User avatar
Robert Jr
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:54 pm

What? Why would that happen?
User avatar
Jason Rice
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:42 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 9:01 pm

No. F-[manually censored]. Way.

Obsidian made the mistake of not repairing FNV, I'll never trust them again. If Skyrim gets DLC, I'll make sure it's going to be made by Bethesda. Never again will I trust Obsidian.
User avatar
Emma Parkinson
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:53 pm

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:35 am

Broken Steel was the biggest ripoff in FO DLC history. they added it because a bunch of TES players could not stand the game ending. I am sorry but that is the truth, no old school FO fans wanted it (other than for the level raise which was the only good thing about it). As I have said I like Point Lookout but one good DLC does not outweigh 4medicor-avaerage DLCs expecially when NV has 4 amazing DLCs.


I'm sorry, but I do not agree that Dead Money, Honest Hearts, Old World Blues or Lonesome Road were amazing, they were average. BGS made some pretty good DLCs for Fallout 3, granted Mothership Zeta and the Pitt weren't that great but Broken Steel, Operation Anchorage and Point Lookout in particular were well worth the money if you ask me.
User avatar
Lizs
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:45 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 11:06 pm

Nah, just let Obsidian continue to develop Fallout for them. That way, Bethesda can focus on TES and DLC Expansions.
User avatar
Solina971
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:40 am

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 3:32 pm

How bout both?
Enough content to last us like .. till TesVI !
User avatar
James Smart
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 7:57 pm

No. F-[manually censored]. Way.

Obsidian made the mistake of not repairing FNV, I'll never trust them again. If Skyrim gets DLC, I'll make sure it's going to be made by Bethesda. Never again will I trust Obsidian.

they fixed it, not to mention Bethesda was resposible for the QA. but that aside did you play FO3 on PS3? it crashed or froze every 20 mins.
User avatar
(G-yen)
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:10 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:53 pm

that is what most people refer to when they say its missing something...


I said lacking not missing. I meant the whole game just felt like (and looked with all thos re-used assets) Fallout 3. The only thing that were new was the story and the setting really.

It felt like a big mod for Fallout 3 to me. A much more boring and lackluster Fallout 3. If you liked it then good for you, I don't determine what you think.

Back on to the DLC. Look at what they have been releasing for Fallout 3 and New Vegas. They have over-seen that DLC is split into bigger packages. There isn't going to be "Horse Armor" like
DLC anymore. This has been stated by Bethesda personally. They were experimenting with Oblivion because it was a new thing to grasp. To be honest I have seen worse DLC. In tiger woods you have the
option to buy a max stats uniform for 400 MS Points and don't forget the Gears of War 3 guns skins. What a rip!
User avatar
gemma king
 
Posts: 3523
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:11 pm

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:39 am

Poll speaks for itself I reckon.
User avatar
Smokey
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 11:35 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 2:37 pm

They never fixed it. They just made things worse with the latest patch. Don't bother arguing with me. I know what I'm talking about for having a defective FNV game and they'll never get me a refund.
User avatar
Jarrett Willis
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:01 pm

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:59 am

The main thing I liked about Obsidian's DLCs were that they were all coherent with the main game in some way. If someone offhandedly mentioned some guy or event in the main-game that you never heard of or saw, chances are they would appear in the DLC and not remain as some faceless phantom, and DLC sometimes even referenced other DLC, which gave a feeling of all of it being interconnected and not some sectioned off experience.
User avatar
Chantel Hopkin
 
Posts: 3533
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:41 am

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:40 am

They never fixed it. They just made things worse with the latest patch. Don't bother arguing with me. I know what I'm talking about for having a defective FNV game and they'll never get me a refund.

Umm I play NV several times a week and I have never had a single crash. I play on PC tho so I can't speak for console gamers.
User avatar
D LOpez
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:30 pm

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:07 am

You are saying that Dead Money and Old World Blues were better than Knights of the Nine and Shivering Isles?

KotN and SI weren't DLC. They were expansions.
User avatar
Ross
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:22 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 2:35 pm

Obsidian shouldn't develop the DLC for Skyrim, because I don't want them to pull another KotOR 2.
User avatar
darnell waddington
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:43 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 11:59 pm

Obsidian shouldn't develop the DLC for Skyrim, because I don't want them to pull another KotOR 2.

that was an epic game. every star wars fan I know liked it and even IGN gave it a good score.
User avatar
Lovingly
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:36 am

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:17 pm

Are you kidding me? You know how many lukewarm games Obsidian has made since Kotor 2? Pass. Stick with the team that built the damn game.

I really love Kotor 2. Still play it. Wish NWN2, DS3, etc. could give me the same enjoyment that game did.
User avatar
Robert Devlin
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:19 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:09 pm

that was an epic game. every star wars fan I know liked it and even IGN gave it a good score.


It could have been truly great if they weren't rushed to finish it.
User avatar
Madeleine Rose Walsh
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:07 am

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:15 am

It could have been truly great if they weren't rushed to finish it.

yes, but again that was not Obsidians fault... That was LucasArts deadline they had to follow. Everyone likes to blame Obsidian when in reality it is usually the publishers who cause the problems with deadlines and lackluster QA.
User avatar
Abel Vazquez
 
Posts: 3334
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:25 am

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 9:54 pm

At least they should get Chris Avellone to write something. I'd buy that.
User avatar
I love YOu
 
Posts: 3505
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:05 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:44 pm

No just no, Bethesda has made plenty of good DLC but like every developer out there they have had a few bad ones. :facepalm:
User avatar
Elena Alina
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:24 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim

cron