That's more territory covered by STALKER and Metro 2033 among others.
Anyways, the 50's American theme is a strong must have in the Fallout series, so I don't see a future game taking place anywhere but the United States.

Its just the DLC part of your idea that bugs me.

Russia in Fallout (USSR) was also nuked to hell, just like the rest of the world. There is no reason at all to have a DLC that will take us from America, to another part of the world. It would just be stupid.

Yes the hole world was nuked to hell, maybe not parts of S-amarica, Africka and type small pacific ilands.

There is any reason to have a DLC that will take us from America, to another part of the world. It would just be a splendid game.

global lore and its only gives more wayes to mack a grate atorry to fill the lore even more whit.

Russia in Fallout (USSR) was also nuked to hell, just like the rest of the world. There is no reason at all to have a DLC that will take us from America, to another part of the world. It would just be stupid.

Mine yes.

Thanks for supporting me

Yeah, you are new and all so you might not know this, just he will support anything that is outside of America. Cause he thinks everything that is in America will be anywhere else in the world. Even though pretty much everything we know in Fallout is American only.

I am not against locations outside of America. Its just that most of the American content will not be in a game that takes place outside of North America.

As for a DLC, there is no logical reason for a DLC that will send us from America to another part of the world and then back again. How would we get there and back? Why would we go there? There is no logic behind a DLC that would send us to another part of the world.

Yeah, you are new and all so you might not know this, just he will support anything that is outside of America. Cause he thinks everything that is in America will be anywhere else in the world. Even though pretty much everything we know in Fallout is American only.

I am not against locations outside of America. Its just that most of the American content will not be in a game that takes place outside of North America.

As for a DLC, there is no logical reason for a DLC that will send us from America to another part of the world and then back again. How would we get there and back? Why would we go there? There is no logic behind a DLC that would send us to another part of the world.

1. San Francisco and LA were already covered in either Fallout (LA) or Fallout 2 (SF), and would now undoubtedly be apart of the NCR. Most, if not all of California would be under NCR control by the time of New Vegas. Unless the NCR were to crumble after the final battle at Hoover Dam, which is unlikely since they're probably just going to have a change in governing, and the NCR name will still be around, I doubt we'll be seeing those places anytime soon.

2. As has already been stated several times by others, replaying the Lone Wanderer would kill any chance of being able to RP. If we were to play the Lone Wanderer again, that's all we could be, we couldn't be anything else. The back history of our character, would already be there, and we couldn't change that. It's best to do as New Vegas did with the Courier, and give us a blank slate that gives us hints and chances to fill in minor parts of our history, but not like Fallout 3 did, which was a bad move.



Kansas might not be that interesting of a state, but it still had plenty of landmarks and things, that could make it interesting. Plus, deadly tornados might be a cool thing to have?

I hear you. But the option of a few different character choices would make it a different game with each selection. As for F1 and F2. Never played them and they certainly weren't done like three. Choosing a location that is iconic, not just to Americans would be the go.

Fallout is an RPG so you make your own character. If you want your character to be the Lone Wanderer than role play as the Lone Wanderer. Fallout and Fallout 2 aren't done like Fallout 3 and New Vegas but you should still give them a shot.

I will actually. As far as choosing a character, I meant having the option to choose a character, all of which have different story lines thus defining the goals/quests etc of that person of which you choose. totally dif game each time. Could be interesting. Would be a challenge for the developers maybe.

I got what you meant. The orginals Fallout had it so you could pick a character. I don't want that back in Fallout. I never used a pre-made character. But even then it didn't change the game world. It would be bad IMO to have options to be the Lone Wanderer or the Courier. Just role play them if you want. Make the character in Fallout 4 just like the guys you made in the last game and go on from there.

I will actually. As far as choosing a character, I meant having the option to choose a character, all of which have different story lines thus defining the goals/quests etc of that person of which you choose. totally dif game each time. Could be interesting. Would be a challenge for the developers maybe.

It's best if you just make a character from your own imagination. It's more likely than not, that if Bethesda tried what you're saying, they'd screw it up. Not that I want that in there, I'm for people using their imagination to make and play a character, not wait for someone else to make some presets. If you want to be the Lone Wanderer again, then so be it, but it should be only through your imagination that he/she is that old Protagonist. The Protagonist should always have a blank slate for a past, that can be filled in with bits and pieces, if you want, like in New Vegas.

Several protagonists each with their own major quest and side quests could be a task for developers. As far as location, they did state that initially they wanted to do the west coast but went with DC. I think this time they'll hit the west.

I gotta play F1 and F2.

I would hope that whatever is chosen that the size of the area to explore is much larger than those before it.

I don't think anyone wants the game to end

The only possibility I see working would be from US to Canada or Mexico. Maybe Detroit to Toronto, or Seattle to Vancouver.

wow, that vulpes thing would make for a great plot for the game, also does legion have any secure lands in florida? if not an invasion could be an quite thrilling aspect if done right

Is this hypothetical?

No the only lands Legion hold are the one around Central South West, like Arizona, Denver, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico
A list of their known locations can be found on the right, slightly down the pape http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Legion.

The only information known about Florida is that it was going to be the setting for Tactics 2 and that the Brotherhood would be there as well. http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Florida


No it's factual

hehe nice link about the legion, "This page needs content. You can help by adding a sentence or an image!" hehe good to know.

its also a big chans they have mowed down to Mexico and if they control a cost area or a major river they will have done some exploring by ship′s and build colony's and trade-stations all around the caribbean, so they can have a hub in Florida to.. but not more then a hub i guess.

I have no idea why the link says that, hopefully that's it fixed now.
Unless everything on their Eastern borders to Florida is tribal lands I don't see them being there with how they currently operate. For them to get there they'd, I assume, have tried assilmating all the opposing factions on the way and by the time they get to Florida it'd be more than just a hub but a town - how major though I don't know
I'd like the Legion to develop more into the Roman role but keep their harsh brutal image of Justice - but since their traders can freely enter other factions lands as caravaners they seem to have it made for them now. Hopefully heavy fortified cities all interlinking make up their lands.

No it's factual