» Fri May 13, 2011 5:13 am
I'm still having trouble understanding Bethesda's logic. For one, they've decided their game needs at least five years to make, possibly six. Second of all, they've decided so far not to release anything other than denials.
Dragon Age 2 was just announced, eight months after the original game, with a projected release two years from the original game. Now, yes. It is a much less expansive game, with less options, content, etc. However, the trend that Bethesda has taken from DF - MW - OB has been a similar downward spiral of less content.
My love for Morrowind borders on obsession. My loathing for the compromises made in Oblivion outweigh my praise for it's advances. I wish Bethesda could simply reassure me with some simple facts about their new game, the first of which is that they're making it.
Second of all, I would like to see that the trend towards simplification has not only stopped, but been reversed. I want to see that they haven't shoved all their eggs in one basket and claimed their combat system was so fragile that they couldn't possibly transfer it to horseback. I want them to include different weapon types regardless of how many people use them over swords. I want to see a large number of factions, some of which are excluded from players based on choices they make.
Maybe they think all the hype that is generated for their games is because of their lack of information. Well, they are wrong. People are excited for the Elderscrolls because it's the Elderscrolls, a series known for it's excellent games. You could have announced TES V three months after Oblivion dropped, and people would still be frantic to see it. However, if they proceed in the direction of diluted games with less and less content, people won't care to see them no matter what type of buzz engine they use to create hype.