Official TESV Speculation Thread #74

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:19 am

I wouldn't doubt it could be as big as dagger fall.



basicly who knows?everyone is just waiting and asking and waiting again. isnt it like a thorn?it get really annoying sometimes.specially when there are rumors and some fools also come to fill em with lies. well its all w8 and see. but seriously sometimes the patience cannot be afforded xD
User avatar
Sabrina Schwarz
 
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:02 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:57 am

beth once said that they ready to show us if that one dude said to show everyone however they really want to impress us, so i was thinking that they would reveal there new game that they have been working on at maybe a important day? the website had that age thing added recently maybe its not to long before they add some good news :) . well we can dream cant we?
User avatar
Karl harris
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 3:17 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:52 am

beth once said that they ready to show us if that one dude said to show everyone however they really want to impress us, so i was thinking that they would reveal there new game that they have been working on at maybe a important day? the website had that age thing added recently maybe its not to long before they add some good news :) . well we can dream cant we?



yes but lets hope the dream stays dream and wont become nightmare.....in a good way
User avatar
Lisha Boo
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:56 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:12 am

beth once said that they ready to show us if that one dude said to show everyone however they really want to impress us, so i was thinking that they would reveal there new game that they have been working on at maybe a important day? the website had that age thing added recently maybe its not to long before they add some good news :) . well we can dream cant we?


I believe it was Todd Howard who said that if Pete Hines the VP of PR and marketing walked into his door and said "SHOW IT" they would because, according to him "they have a lot to show."

Also, while im on the subject of Pete Hines and Bethesda's marketing team, after watching the hype train for Fallout New Vegas, I believe Bethesda might be starting a new trend and promoting the hell out of their franchises.

Fallout New Vegas received undeniably a much larger promotional campaign than Fallout 3 ever did. Parties were held, pre-order deals were made, graphic novels were released, Giant props were erected, TV spots were created.

I strongly believe that its in Bethesda's new (marketing) intention, to make Elderscrolls V as big of a hype train as Fallout New Vegas was. Is that a bad thing? Probably not..as FNV lived up to the hype for me. But what does that say about how and when it will be announced...?

Well, some of you know my thoughts on this already...
User avatar
My blood
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:09 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:26 pm

I believe it was Todd Howard who said that if Pete Hines the VP of PR and marketing walked into his door and said "SHOW IT" they would because, according to him "they have a lot to show."

Also, while im on the subject of Pete Hines and Bethesda's marketing team, after watching the hype train for Fallout New Vegas, I believe Bethesda might be starting a new trend and promoting the hell out of their franchises.

Fallout New Vegas received undeniably a much larger promotional campaign than Fallout 3 ever did. Parties were held, pre-order deals were made, graphic novels were released, Giant props were erected, TV spots were created.

I strongly believe that its in Bethesda's new (marketing) intention, to make Elderscrolls V as big of a hype train as Fallout New Vegas was. Is that a bad thing? Probably not..as FNV lived up to the hype for me. But what does that say about how and when it will be announced...?

Well, some of you know my thoughts on this already...

i dont know much about this but games that are really hyped up by the company owners are lacking in quality game play such as fable 2 and FNV ( dont get me wrong it was a good game but many flaws) and fable 3 wasnt as good as i hoped it would be. Hopefully TeS V isn't like this though
User avatar
MR.BIGG
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:24 am

While http://www.gamesradar.com/xbox360/the-darkness/news/rumor-parent-company-of-id-and-bethesda-gobbles-up-another-studio/a-20101104144553649047/g-20060303131525831098 doesn't exactly relate to ESV, it relates to Zenimax and is pretty interesting...
User avatar
Scott Clemmons
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 5:35 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:33 am

While http://www.gamesradar.com/xbox360/the-darkness/news/rumor-parent-company-of-id-and-bethesda-gobbles-up-another-studio/a-20101104144553649047/g-20060303131525831098 doesn't exactly relate to ESV, it relates to Zenimax and is pretty interesting...


Damn! They never know when to stop, do they? I can't tell whether this is a good thing or a bad thing? What if they end up like EA or Activison, these companies are evil D:
User avatar
Jake Easom
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:33 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:23 am

Damn! They never know when to stop, do they? I can't tell whether this is a good thing or a bad thing? What if they end up like EA or Activison, these companies are evil D:

Small companies die in today's world... this is smart, even if we are looking at Zenimax as becoming something of a monster... at least it'll be around!
User avatar
Deon Knight
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:44 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:42 am

I believe it was Todd Howard who said that if Pete Hines the VP of PR and marketing walked into his door and said "SHOW IT" they would because, according to him "they have a lot to show."

Also, while im on the subject of Pete Hines and Bethesda's marketing team, after watching the hype train for Fallout New Vegas, I believe Bethesda might be starting a new trend and promoting the hell out of their franchises.

Fallout New Vegas received undeniably a much larger promotional campaign than Fallout 3 ever did. Parties were held, pre-order deals were made, graphic novels were released, Giant props were erected, TV spots were created.

I strongly believe that its in Bethesda's new (marketing) intention, to make Elderscrolls V as big of a hype train as Fallout New Vegas was. Is that a bad thing? Probably not..as FNV lived up to the hype for me. But what does that say about how and when it will be announced...?

Well, some of you know my thoughts on this already...

This is why I think an announcement at the VGAs is likely. After their success with their past few games, Bethesda will want to announce their new game to a wide audience. An announcement on their website seems too quiet for a an upcoming AAA game nowadays. That would also probably lead to a February GI cover after the event.
User avatar
Dean Ashcroft
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:20 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:00 am

Damn! They never know when to stop, do they? I can't tell whether this is a good thing or a bad thing? What if they end up like EA or Activison, these companies are evil D:


Zenimax is one of the few companies out there that allows the companies it owns extreme amounts of freedom. They can get as big as EA or Activision but as long as they keep doing what they've been doing, i.e. allowing as much freedom as needed, their reputation will be leagues better than the reputation of those companies.
User avatar
Matthew Aaron Evans
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:59 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:04 am

/\

exactly. while Zenimax owns Bethesda, Beth still does its own thing just as well as before, but has more available reasorces and technology
User avatar
Fanny Rouyé
 
Posts: 3316
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:47 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:43 pm

Zenimax is one of the few companies out there that allows the companies it owns extreme amounts of freedom. They can get as big as EA or Activision but as long as they keep doing what they've been doing, i.e. allowing as much freedom as needed, their reputation will be leagues better than the reputation of those companies.

I look forward to this success, continuing allowance of freedom, and serving as an example of a good gaming giant.
User avatar
cheryl wright
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:43 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:27 am

Zenimax is one of the few companies out there that allows the companies it owns extreme amounts of freedom. They can get as big as EA or Activision but as long as they keep doing what they've been doing, i.e. allowing as much freedom as needed, their reputation will be leagues better than the reputation of those companies.

id is still "doing their own thing" but they haven't been owned long enough for us to see if there are any constraints, and the other studios Arkane and Tango were just acquired so same boat there. The only other studios are Vir2L and Mud Duck... and for the life of me I can't think of anything they have put out since they have been acquired so I think it remains to be seen whether or not the Zenimax family will be allowed real independence. I think a driving force within their creative element, BGS, is innately an independent entity in as much as it truly is the creative force that has allowed Zenimax to become an attractive investment and thereby further its growth. If the Zenimax Online project is a TES MMO it will only show that the influence of the true Zenimax creative (BGS) is a driver in the over-all business model. Only time will really tell if the other developers will remain independent creative entities, or whether studios like Arkane will be utilized in a supporting role (which they are best at).

How this relates to TESV, well frankly it doesn't, so I am not going to comment anymore on this... at least in this forum!
User avatar
Casey
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:38 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:24 pm

How this relates to TESV, well frankly it doesn't, so I am not going to comment anymore on this... at least in this forum!

ya it does: a better and freer team can make a better game faster.
User avatar
Queen Bitch
 
Posts: 3312
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 2:43 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:43 pm

Original Riddike game was a sweet and unique action/adventure. And they could teach Bethesda a thing or two about first person combat, then again so could the guys that made Dark Messiah.
User avatar
Marine x
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:54 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:52 pm

Original Riddike game was a sweet and unique action/adventure. And they could teach Bethesda a thing or two about first person combat, then again so could the guys that made Dark Messiah.

I thought about that. If this compelling evidence is true, then Bethesda has two game studios who've done first-person combat in really good/fun ways.
User avatar
Daniel Brown
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 11:21 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:41 pm

Zenimax is one of the few companies out there that allows the companies it owns extreme amounts of freedom. They can get as big as EA or Activision but as long as they keep doing what they've been doing, i.e. allowing as much freedom as needed, their reputation will be leagues better than the reputation of those companies.


I welcome the ascendancy of super entities like Zenimax, although with some hesitation.

Pros -

* Shared technologies, no wasteful developments and overlaps.

* Secure funding, and a body to be answerable to (thinking of Interplay for one).

* It becomes profitable for cater to niche markets, or at the very least safer.

* Possibility of a new generation of executives not clueless or hostile to games or gamers (didn't happen to Hollywood though :sadvaultboy:) Edit: Meaning hostile to it's market.

Cons -

Too many to list. Zenimax is interested in making money above all else, time will tell.
User avatar
Amy Gibson
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:37 am

Original Riddike game was a sweet and unique action/adventure. And they could teach Bethesda a thing or two about first person combat, then again so could the guys that made Dark Messiah.

I wonder how much the game companies will influence Bethesda's projects, though. Todd Howard himself said that he knew very little about New Vegas's development, as Bethesda Softworks was looking over Obsidian's shoulder, but Bethesda Game Studios is working diligently on its project.

To be honest, I have a feeling that these companies like id, Splash Damage, etc. will have little, if not nothing to do with BGS. It has already been stated that the project BGS is working on is far along in development.

It's just as likely that Bethesda would learn a thing or two about open worlds by looking at Red Dead Redemption as they would learn something about first person combat by looking at games that are subsidiaries of ZeniMax.
User avatar
Dean Ashcroft
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:20 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:11 am

I wonder how much the game companies will influence Bethesda's projects, though. Todd Howard himself said that he knew very little about New Vegas's development, as Bethesda Softworks was looking over Obsidian's shoulder, but Bethesda Game Studios is working diligently on its project.

To be honest, I have a feeling that these companies like id, Splash Damage, etc. will have little, if not nothing to do with BGS. It has already been stated that the project BGS is working on is far along.

It's just as likely that Bethesda would learn a thing or to about open worlds by looking at Red Dead Redemption as they would learn something about first person combat by looking at games that are subsidiaries of ZeniMax.


I don't think it would be a gaming commune, just that things can get shared within the Zenimax family that otherwise would be jealously guarded.

Edit: Sometimes huge amounts of time and money could be saved with a half hour chat with a sister company on problems they are facing, rather than spending time reverse engineering a competitors finished product.
User avatar
Anthony Diaz
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:24 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:49 am


I strongly believe that its in Bethesda's new (marketing) intention, to make Elderscrolls V as big of a hype train as Fallout New Vegas was. Is that a bad thing? Probably not..as FNV lived up to the hype for me. But what does that say about how and when it will be announced...?



I would agree with this. BGS certainly has tremendous amount of reputation, plus capital, and a much larger staff. If TESV is only a six month window from announcement to release it will be a cyclonic force.

While http://www.gamesradar.com/xbox360/the-darkness/news/rumor-parent-company-of-id-and-bethesda-gobbles-up-another-studio/a-20101104144553649047/g-20060303131525831098 doesn't exactly relate to ESV, it relates to Zenimax and is pretty interesting...


I had an eerie premonition about Arkane being purchased, but Tango and Machinegames in less than two weeks (has it been two weeks? I know time flies when you're having acquisitions)? I'm curious as to how much of the $150 million Providence investment will go to game studio acquisitions (and what the balance would be after the last two purchases).
User avatar
christelle047
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:50 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:43 pm

I would agree with this. BGS certainly has tremendous amount of reputation, plus capital, and a much larger staff. If TESV is only a six month window from announcement to release it will be a cyclonic force.



I had an eerie premonition about Arkane being purchased, but Tango and Machinegames in less than two weeks (has it been two weeks? I know time flies when you're having acquisitions)? I'm curious as to how much of the $150 million Providence investment will go to game studio acquisitions (and what the balance would be after the last two purchases).



yes but we cnt figure that out can we?at least for now
User avatar
Rob Smith
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:59 am

ZeniMax is just acquiring companies left and right, isn't it? The funny thing is in a lot of the articles about ZeniMax, it's usually just called "Bethesda Softworks' parent company." Because until recently the only worthwhile thing they owned was Bethesda/
User avatar
GPMG
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:55 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:47 am

ZeniMax is just acquiring companies left and right, isn't it? The funny thing is in a lot of the articles about ZeniMax, it's usually just called "Bethesda Softworks' parent company." Because until recently the only worthwhile thing they owned was Bethesda/


Interestingly, in the article revealing Machinegames' purchase it refers to Zenimax as the owner of both id and Bethesda Softworks. It seems that id has now squeezed into Zenimax's limelight (not that this is the least bit surprising).

Like everyone else, I'm cautiously optimistic about Zenimax's explosive growth. Financial stability for development and technology sharing are both strong positives. However, anything remotely approaching EA or Activision would ultimately not be a good thing for our beloved series.

As this subject of Zenimax's acquisitions becomes more applicable to discussion, perhaps a separate thread should be created to keep this one clean.
User avatar
CxvIII
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:35 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:56 am

Any reason why id, the creators of Doom, Wolfenstein and Quake became a forgotten acquisition of Zenimax?
User avatar
Penny Wills
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:16 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:54 am

Any reason why id, the creators of Doom, Wolfenstein and Quake became a forgotten acquisition of Zenimax?


I don't know, but the answer to that question appears to be beyond the scope of this thread so that discussion should probably happen somewhere else.
User avatar
Danny Warner
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:26 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion