» Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:06 pm
Well, it's been a few months since I first read the book and the "shock and awe" of finally having the story of TES bumped ahead a few decades has worn off. I can now look at it more objectively and say that my opinion is virtually unchanged.
The characters, first. Some of them do come off as a bit flat, but really it's a consistency issue so far, where supposedly minor characters like Glim and Colin are more interesting than Annaig, who is supposedly the central protagonist.
The short length: Well, another TES series to LotR parallel is that this is clearly the first half of a single larger book which was divided for publication. This explains why the book doesn't so much end on a cliffhanger but feel like a chapter ended and the rest of the book is missing. It's likely a lot of the flat characters will get fleshed out more in the second half of the book.
The prose: Yeah, it's alright. A few misused metaphors like the blood vessels one, but it's better than saying intestines. Those make people uncomfortable. Sometimes he trips over it a little, but nothing too serious.
The plot: Well, in typical Keyes style this is a lot of smaller plots woven around a larger one all peripherally related. Colin is going after Vuhon's mole, Sul and Attrebus are trying to stop Umbriel from the outside in an archetypal hero journey (props to that), Glim is just trying to survive, and each is working towards a greater goal in the bit picture. Some people don't like the direction the book is taking the world in because it's written "by an outsider" which I'll talk more about later, but the thing is, Bethesda made sure that he didn't conflict with anything they wanted to do in the future. Let that sink in, Umbriel, Landfall, divided Elsweyr, the Mede Empire, all of that was either already thought up or doesn't conflict with ideas they already had.
Landfall: But the thing people seem to be focusing on most is Landfall. I was relieved that it happened the way it did, as rampant fan speculation held that all of Tamriel's surface would be rendered uninhabitable. This is much better as it does fulfill the technical requirements and does change up the landscape, but does allow for the Tamriel we all know to continue. Some people are disappointed by it happening (which a lot of us knew was coming since 2003) and still others disappointed that there is any Tamriel left as we know it. But see above.
The author: Greg Keyes is an acclaimed fantasy and sci fi author. Some people seem to have been or are still uncomfortable with the fact that he is "an outsider," that he hadn't been a part of writing previous TES titles. Well, the fact that he came in to the ranks of people who have written for TES starting at the novel isn't something that can be changed, but another fact that can't be changed is that one book is already out and the second is likely mostly finished, so deal with it. The lore is sound, and while there's no reason you should be forced or compelled to like it, declaring dis-continuity because it was written by GK and not MK is just being whiny. Grow up.
So my overall opinion is like a 7. A good book to read in it's own right but not great, but it's primary draw beyond that is that it's TES and that it works as TES.
PS: One last point here, who else caught the Attrebus was a fake beforehand? If you did, how? Mine was reasoning that Keyes does some sword fighting himself, but had Attrebus block with the flat of his sword and not the edge. He would have known that blocking with the edge may chip it a little, but blocking with the flat could make your sword bend and be useless, so he wouldn't have had Attrebus block with the flat if he could earnestly fight.