No they weren't, they were seperate worldspaces just like the oblivion cities.I do
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12544/12544506ae625caa57cfc39f9b39e664a534dcb9" alt="Razz :P"
My rig isn't that good (it's a laptop). I use the latest better cities and they have a toggle open cities option on most of the cities, and I don't see much framerate drop at all. Maybe a few, but not enough to make it stutter/unplayable.
No, no, no. I'm talking about the difference between closed vanilla cities and Better Cities (opened in the menu). If you don't have a drop in FPS then I'm going to give you a medal right now. BTW, 20FPS is not a shippable framerate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d453b/d453b9d6776f86da7bf13f36033909e8f599edd0" alt="Smile :)"
What I was explaining is that they could have done something as high quality as Open Better Cities in the vanilla game if they had proper culling, among the other things I explained.
wait wait wait wait, they're using umbra software for Skyrim? How do we know that?
We don't. And they're probably not. They clearly don't like middleware after dropping Gamebryo and Speedtree. I understand the need for Havok, nobody wants to write physics from scratch.
We don't know, we are just hoping
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a3be/0a3be425cdab648512d6c5bcd4a185b79a90f634" alt="Very Happy :D"
Edit: Ninja'd. That's twice in the same thread now
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e34f5/e34f5ccda90f29435dfc46b6cd8f7eba1a1bf1d3" alt="Sad :("
Why are we hoping? I'm not hoping. Nobody should be hoping, honestly. Middleware is usually a negative. You get something pre-made that maybe isn't exactly the best fit, but it's to save time. I hope they just wrote their own, one that fits Skyrim better. And there's really nothing that Umbra has done that isn't published in a million academic papers on the topic.