2 part question

Post » Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:39 am

What makes you think that? They seem good enough for me.

In that case, he is completely wrong.
User avatar
Stacey Mason
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:18 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:42 pm

In that case, he is completely wrong.


:lol:
User avatar
Angus Poole
 
Posts: 3594
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 9:04 pm

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:25 pm

I belive they use archers, catupults, bastilions, and spears in navel combat :spotted owl:
User avatar
leigh stewart
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:59 am

Post » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:05 am

Funny. But not so much. Even during the era where black powder muzzle loaders saw their greatest level of development and use, sinking enemy ships was unusual and not even a primary goal.

It's common sense, really. Firing randomly at a large timber object doesn't cause it to magically fill with water.
Chainshot for the mast and graqeshot for the crew. The goal was often to have the hull in tact so they could tow it into port and refit it because they take so long to make.
User avatar
Bones47
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:15 pm

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:01 pm

Chainshot for the mast and graqeshot for the crew. The goal was often to have the hull in tact so they could tow it into port and refit it because they take so long to make.


So what was even the point of having solid shot at all?
User avatar
Melis Hristina
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:36 pm

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:32 pm

Chainshot for the mast and graqeshot for the crew. The goal was often to have the hull in tact so they could tow it into port and refit it because they take so long to make.

Aye. But too much is made over different types of shot, I believe. Roundshot was likewise intended to knock away spars and rigging or kill crew with shrapnel, depending on where it was aimed. Even if rudimentary cannons are in use anywhere in Tamriel, they are probably too basic for any application besides point, shoot, hope the hole is biggish and the noise is scary.

And shipboard mages would be truly devastating, and far more useful than any disparity in technology. Snap a few ropes, cripple a ship.

But otherwise, all naval tactics would ultimately lend themselves to carrying opponents by boarding.

Naspis: Roundshot was almost always used, as it is deadly at range to structure, guns, crew, and rigging.
User avatar
Nomee
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 5:18 pm

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:57 pm

So what was even the point of having solid shot at all?

For smashing the timber and sinking the ship. But again, it's usually prefferable to caputure the ship than sink it.
User avatar
Bad News Rogers
 
Posts: 3356
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:37 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:14 pm

For smashing the timber and sinking the ship. But again, it's usually prefferable to caputure the ship than sink it.

Fire a ball into oak and the interior of the bulwark will explode even if the shot does not penetrate, showering foot-long http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmE7ozh2DRY of jagged wood and blunt chunks across the deck. It will also dismount gun carriages, which may go careening around the deck crushing everything in their path or smashing through the side. Sinking a large ship takes hours of concentrated fire and a favorable position.

But these are all very modern considerations, and cannons used on ES ships would be a very different story. Prestige pop-guns.
User avatar
Dean Ashcroft
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:20 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:22 pm

Funny. But not so much. Even during the era where black powder muzzle loaders saw their greatest level of development and use, sinking enemy ships was unusual and not even a primary goal.

It's common sense, really. Firing randomly at a large timber object doesn't cause it to magically fill with water.



Quite correct. Usually, the aim of the cannon was to eliminate crew, and to destroy sails and masts.

For the former, graqeshot at close range works well to kill surface deck hands manning and trimming sails.
Round shot at distance to eliminate crew belowdecks with wood splinters, but requires heavy cannon to be effective unless being used against a light cruise ship, like a pinnace.

For the latter, chainshot at close range also works.


The problem with these tactics in a world filled with magic, is that a few mages on deck could fire area-effect firestorm spells at YOUR ship before you get into range, and end up doing several forms of damage at once: It ignights your sails and rigging, kills crew, and catches the deck on fire-- which, if you are armed with cannons, can get to the powder magazine, and make your ship explode.
User avatar
michael flanigan
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:33 pm

Post » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:00 am

God's Fire FTW

Considering the endless opportunity for magic battles available with the TES universe, most of battles are considerably boring and feature little to no logical use of arcane power at all.

Wouldn't be easier to simply summon a bunch of Winged Twilight, have them fly over to the enemy ship and cut up the deck hands and crew?

Gameplay magic and real-ES magic aren't the best of friends, regrettably.
User avatar
Kayla Bee
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:34 pm

Post » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:28 am

God's Fire FTW

Considering the endless opportunity for magic battles available with the TES universe, most of battles are considerably boring and feature little to no logical use of arcane power at all.

Wouldn't be easier to simply summon a bunch of Winged Twilight, have them fly over to the enemy ship and cut up the deck hands and crew?

Gameplay magic and real-ES magic aren't the best of friends, regrettably.



I'd think a flame attronach on the deck would be more of a problem... Fires on deck are a serious problem on ships with cloth sails and hemp rigging.


Another potentially deadly attack, would be to circle your enemy ship with your mages on the poop, blasting the bejeebus out of the water aft your ship with ice spells, creating iceburgs and ice sheets.

You could herd and pen in an enemy vessel that way.
User avatar
Allison Sizemore
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:09 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:01 pm

I'd think a flame attronach on the deck would be more of a problem... Fires on deck are a serious problem on ships with cloth sails and hemp rigging.


Yeah, but Flame Atronachs can't fly. How'd you get it over to the enemy vessel? :P
User avatar
Marie
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:05 am

Post » Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:41 am

Yeah, but Flame Atronachs can't fly. How'd you get it over to the enemy vessel? :P



Well, before that silly "levitation act" garbage------ Mages can fly!


It'd be like a bombing run!
User avatar
Neliel Kudoh
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:39 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:27 pm

Well, before that silly "levitation act" garbage------ Mages can fly!
It'd be like a bombing run!


Haha!

The Mage will always get through.
User avatar
Jonathan Montero
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:22 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:36 pm

Snap Rope 35 pts in 10 ft on target.

Disable every large vessel afloat with childlike ease.
User avatar
ONLY ME!!!!
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:16 pm

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:28 pm

Snap Rope 35 pts in 10 ft on target.

Disable every large vessel afloat with childlike ease.



Wouldnt that be more of a "Disintigrate rigging, 50pts for 30 secs, 10 ft on target"?
User avatar
Brian Newman
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:36 pm

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:40 pm

Snap Rope 35 pts in 10 ft on target.

Disable every large vessel afloat with childlike ease.

I'm not sure where you're from, or whether you grew up with the metric system, but 10 ft. isn't very far. I'd rather go for about 35 pts for 200 ft. in a naval battle.
Wouldnt that be more of a "Disintigrate rigging, 50pts for 30 secs, 10 ft on target"?

I'd imagine that costs extra magicka. :ninja:
User avatar
SWagg KId
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 8:26 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:33 pm

I'm not sure where you're from, or whether you grew up with the metric system, but 10 ft. isn't very far. I'd rather go for about 35 pts for 200 ft. in a naval battle.



Just aim for the spar, and the main mast. 10ft would be sufficient, if you targeted the right areas.

However, I agree, a bigger area-effect lets you be less accurate, and lob shots with less precision.
User avatar
Taylor Tifany
 
Posts: 3555
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:22 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:44 pm

I was thinking you wanted to hit multiple ships at once, sorry.

I guess you could just have multiple mages for that. :shrug:
User avatar
ImmaTakeYour
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:45 pm

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:33 pm

Easier way, simply cast "Absorb Sailing, 40 pts for 20 seconds on Target" at the sailors. They'll soon forget they they're even on a ship and lose.
User avatar
Joanne Crump
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:44 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:38 pm

No, I mean snap rope. Get rid of the mainstay, a crucial lift, or a sheet, the sail is disabled or the entire mast goes by the board. Very simple and effective.
User avatar
Kat Stewart
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:30 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:17 pm

Easier way, simply cast "Absorb Sailing, 40 pts for 20 seconds on Target" at the sailors. They'll soon forget they they're even on a ship and lose.



"Frenzy humanoid 50pts, 20ft, 200 secs on target" with "Drain intelligence 10pts, 20ft, 200 sec on target"


Then they run around and destroy their own ship.


Paws:

I am thinking more of disintegrating the rigging on the main mast, which would drop the mainsail, and also cause the main boom to swing freely.


(Coupled with a fire emergency, and iceburgs in the water, it spells certain doom for the ship.)
User avatar
Nick Tyler
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:57 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:11 pm

A savvy mage could choose which running rigging to cripple, and actually wrest control of the ship by causing an unbalance of sails to change to a basic course.
User avatar
Albert Wesker
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:17 pm

Post » Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:17 am

A savvy mage could choose which running rigging to cripple, and actually wrest control of the ship by causing an unbalance of sails to change to a basic course.



Like-- right into some rocks, onto a coral head, or into an (artificial) iceburg...............
User avatar
IsAiah AkA figgy
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:43 am

Post » Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:54 pm

Like-- right into some rocks, onto a coral head, or into an (artificial) iceburg...............

Stop thinking so dramatically. :P Just make half the enemy fleet miss stays when they wear, splitting them up to destroyed later.
User avatar
jodie
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:42 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion