Biased poll. I checked off no perks. I am thinking you mean like Fallout 3 or New Vegas? No thank you for that. Then you have what it should be. Well if I don't want it, why should I choose what it should be then? So I had to pick other because I don't agree with the 2 choices you gave, there should be none as well or the option not to vote, which you can't do.
I did and all anyone says is, " THIS IS NOT FALLOUT 3!!!" There is no discussion about how to improve character customization, it is the same as FoNV coming out and everyone saying, "THIS IS NOT FALLOUT 3!!!!" I want to hear some reasoning as to why making generic, 1-size-fits-all characters is better than having something with a bit of personality.
I find that Bethesda's Fallout has no personality. I made 5 characters in Fallout 3 and they all seemed the same. At least in TES I made 5 different characters (actually over 20) they all felt different, until the end when they almost all seem the same, just like in Fallout 3.
I guess I should just not bother with TES 5 if it is going to have dull combat. I can not stand First person perspective or single character games that have 0 combat customization other than equipping different weapons.
I find the combat the same in Fallout 3. Repetitive. Same thing over and over again. Where do you find combat more fun in Bethesda's Fallouts that is more fun? How is adding perks make it more personality?
As opposed to, in melee, doing the same exact poking with every type of weapon, with the only fundamental difference being speed and maximum damage per hit. I guess having no customization at all = greater customization overall. Sorry... I just do not see it and I am trying hard not to be sarcastic.
But you are sounding sarcastic just because we don't agree with you. We make valid comments, and you choose not to acknowladge them because YOU don't agree with what others say. We respect what you like but you don't respect ours. That is why people don't repect what you say now.