[quote]@LOZZAT - I love your enthusiasm! Thank you for signing the petition. Your comment is spot on.
@Enfadel - I was hoping you wouldn't go there. (planned obsolescence) Too often in the Industry do I see 3 month post timelines. Sadly a lot of what you say can be seen in almost every company I can think of (Well maybe not Blizzard). The idea of making something better each time can be distorted to reinforce the sobering truth that some things just aren't good enough.
Kind of random, but I am reminded of a line from an Adam Sandler film. I think its Big Daddy? He is talking to his son I believe and trying to tell him how great he is. Every father wants to be the hero of their son. Sandler's kid basically tells him that maybe he is just a normal guy and that he needs to come to grips with the reality. Not everyone can be the best.
Our passion for what the Crytek seed grew into over the years might be a false idle. I hate to even think it but maybe Crytek is comfortable being 2nd to Halo or even 3rd to Modern Warfare.
Also, there is another aspect of release and longevity that you haven't touched on. When a player stays with a game for a long period of time, they don't buy the competitors games either. PC game sales were stunted for a long time after the release of games like WoW. It was so intrusive and has such a strong fanbase that PC Game Companies started dropping like flies.
It is kind of like trying to be a 3rd Party Developer on the Wii, Nintendo has such a strong grip on the market when they release their titles, that they squeeze out the chance for success for many of their partners in the Industry. Both of these companies produce some excellent titles, but there needs to be room for the little guys too.
Little guys like map Editors. :][/quote]
I agree about some titles stifling others sales.
When I bought Crysis in 2007, I didn't buy another franchises game until 2010 with Bad Company 2.
When people are loyal to a company, they tend to only but from them.
Also while Crytek's games will probably always be second considered to franchises like Call of Duty, they can still have games that shine in their own light.
For instance, Crytek's first game Far Cry was one of the most played pc games in 2004, and it shone brightly, and sold 3.5 million copies early on. It got it's own movie and Ubisoft's Far Cry 2 sold even more than the original based off Crytek's success.
Crytek really had a great success with Far Cry, and it was really beyond me why they sold the franchise to Ubisoft. Unfortunately, Crytek's second franchise Crysis hasn't been nearly as successful so far, and has been sitting in the squalor of a second rate franchise. It seems that Crytek is comfortable with that right now, especially when they have been getting outside attention from Microsoft.
Sadly, I don't think that Crytek can become a big company again until they move away from Crysis. Now, Crysis has definitely done well enough for sequels, but I seriously think that if Crytek can't do something big with the Crysis franchise before 2012, that they should consider moving on to a creating a new franchise.
Crytek as a company was so great and created a great game, but unfortunately Crysis has been a second-rate game. Hopefully I'm proven wrong with Crysis 2, but Crytek should seriously consider making a new IP. I think their biggest mistake was to sell Far Cry to Ubisoft, and they are still living with the consequences of it, because Crysis hasn't been nearly as successful.