Oh, god, yes. (Of course, other times this have been suggested, various l33t d00ds have popped in to mock people who can't manage their save files without handholding. Or something like that. )

Don't necessarily agree with this one.... sure, Skyrim may have over-used it, but there are legitimate plot reasons ("realism" "immersion!" ) where an NPC might force an interaction on you.

...there really are a lot of people who just can't ignore a note in their journal, aren't there? (me, I saw the things added to my Skyrim journal as "overheard this. I'll remember that just in case...." rather than Must Do This Quest. )

I don't know if this is exactly "Unrealistic" but i'd like to see the darker side of scientific progress. The commonwealth aka boston have made Synthetic humans. So where is the middle ground?

Something like "Robo Brains" that still have their human memories and personality, odd cybernetic experiments, Full conversion cyborgs, genetic hybrids etc etc

Maybe find an underground encampment of "Protectrons" "Sentries" and "Robo Brains" that are actually people, just with a human brain inside instead of a simple robot ai.

I want the Fallout 4 world as big as the Witcher 3's and have no (minimal) loading like the Witcher 3, and be as graphically impressive. Wait, why is this unrealistic?

I fully agree with the first two points. No force-greetings, especially if I'm sneaking and I've just crossed some mandatory "I can now see you and talk to you" trigger point. Also, no Quests automatically added. Give me Notes and pointers, sure, but don't give me a full Quest just because I, once again, crossed a threshold whilst exploring and am now involved in some Quest. In fact, I loathed Mothership Zeta for this exact thing. I purposefully don't activate and track Quests, so I'll scour the Wasteland. However, I must've ran into the abduction zone for Mothership Zeta, by accident, so many times as a result. Put the trigger for it as something I must activate or go inside, not just walk up to it.

I disagree on the last 2 points though. I play on a console, I do not have console commands and I will not be able to reverse an essential NPC death without reloading a save, which I won't do if I didn't notice them die or if I didn't know they were important. Perhaps make it an option? I mean, modders can no doubt help with that, right? Same goes with failing Quests. The amount of times I did that Monorail one in Camp McCarran, having Quests fail permanently would be a nightmare.

NPC's actually recognizing and reacting to your feats and accomplishments. Instead of giving you the same rude and robotic responses, NPC's could either praise you or treat you like crap and not treat you the same, regardless of what you've accomplished.

256 mods in load order on day one. Impossible to be sure but I can dream!

The Enclave returned as good guys in this next fallout installment. A change in leadership led the enclave into a lyons brotherhood path where they help people in the wasteland but have better technology and can do more then the brotherhood could.

On the first point: it's more that they can get your attention without marching up to you and getting in your face if you get anywhere near them. In Oblivion, for example, Glarthir would stand there behind the building and call out to you to come over and talk to him, and would only initiate a force-greet if you got fairly close. This let you know there was potentially a quest to do there, without having the NPC giving it get in your face whether you wanted him to or not.

On the second point: it's not an issue of journal clutter (I treated the Misc section as 'things to do if/when I happen to be in the area', myself), so much as one of not having the option to refuse the quest outright. For example: after the marketplace attack that occurs when you first enter Markarth, the guy standing near the inn force-greets you; any dialogue path you pursue ends with him handing you a note, with no option to tell him to go bother someone else nor to refuse to accept said note.

thought on the "forced conversation" thing..... if FO4 convo's only happen via this "real time conversation" system, then I'd guess that there won't be any forced interactions. Guy will run up to you and yell for attention, and, well. Talk to him or don't.

(On the other hand, if they have conversations in both ways.....)

As you can tell, I haven't watched any gameplay vids. Just the trailer, combat montage, and crafting montage.

Ah, yeah. I'd forgotten about that one. Haven't replayed Skyrim as much as some of the others (sooooo many games to play these days) that I guess it (and similar) didn't stick in my memory. Hmm.

(And FO4 will add another to the list. AAAAAA! Too many Beth games to play for hundreds of hours each, while also playing other games! )

I have mixed feelings about forced dialogue. On one hand, it ensures that you get the info you need to get a quest. After all, it would be kind of dumb to never get a quest just because you ran away from some guy you never saw.

On the other hand, it would solve some issues. I remember being forced to stay in dialogue with Meridia during her Skyrim quest. At the same time I spoke with her, a dragon spawned. So there I am, stuck a 1000 feet in the air, with a dragon flying around my head and not being able to do anything or go anywhere. Some things in Bethesda games get super janky when interrupted.

Well, if you wanted the quest you wouldn't run away from the giver.

It's not so much about the individual instances themselves, so much as it is about how the presentation thereof comes across: "since we (the developers) made it possible for every character to do every quest, it must, therefore, follow that every character will do every quest; as such, every character must be made to accept them whether they actually want to or not, so that they won't miss out." Which is patent nonsense, but somehow the developers keep missing that point.

I meant more along the lines of those annoying messengers. Sometimes they give you a letter that starts the quest, but I'm fairly oblivious when it comes to ambient dialogue in video games.

"Dovahkiin, I have a-"

"Ya, ya, generic NPC, I know you have an arrow in your knee. Good for you. Can't you see I'm invading a town with my horde of zombie giants?"

Or maybe they don't expect every player to do a quest just because it gets put in their journal; I thought that was the point when Bethesda made a Miscellaneous tab for Skyrim and had every major questline start with just one little misc prompt like "Visit the College of Winterhold" or "Speak to the Leader of the Companions". There's certainly never any rush to get to them.

Yeesh, those guys. Interrupting us mid-combat should have resulted in an auto-kill on them, just to remind them how stupid they were being.

Don't even get me started on the guard dialogues, I could fill pages with that rant.

EDIT-

@BOX MAAAN: I suppose so, but the lack of 'decline' options made it feel like they assumed the way I mentioned.

That sounds like a personal problem to me. Someone has talked to you about doing something. That thing is now available for you to do if you so choose. The only thing compelling you to do it is yourself. The game certainly doesn't. It doesn't really compelling you to do anything, which is one of its problems. Very few things feel urgent. But by putting it in your journal automatically, it's giving you a choice. You can choose to do it. You can choose not to do it. Perhaps more importantly, though, after deciding not to do it, you can choose to change your mind.

Beer bottles that break when I shoot them.

A working game of pool.

I unrealistically expect gamesas to update their game engine to 2008 standarts, because that would remove that freaking neck seam that i realy don't like.

That one always puzzled me. They have physics on the table, on the balls, and equip-able cues in the game... yet you have to play with the BB gun.

And even then you can't sink the 8 ball

After FO3 came out Skykappa and I (as well as a few others) combed though the code of six or seven free-license pool games to see if we could shoehorn something into a mod for the game (because I've always wanted to be a wasteland pool shark) but we couldn't find anything that the scripting could handle

so....

TO THE DEVS!!

(because I know you guys are reading this)

if you guys can add a working pool game to the base executable or one of the expected DLCs Falchya and I will name our first born after whoever gets it into the game*

*provided it's a boy... no way I'm naming my daughter Todd..

Also, to compile their game with 64bit support, but i guess that is too much to ask.

...why? The current-gen consoles are 64 bit as well. I'd be surprised if FO4 PC wasn't 64 bit.

I got one. My unrealistic expectation is for Bethesda to not ruin most of its coolest armors by giving them speech, sub-par stats, or bugs that make them risky to use.

@sgtrock, the enclave were never "good" guys.

Back to the topic at hand, A decent "end" to the main mission line that gives us a good feeling of satisfaction and accomplishment for doing it.

That Pete Rose will finally be put into the Hall of Fame.

Oh yeah, and weapons that don't clip through armor when they're holstered. And maybe actual holsters for pistols (like the scabbards for swords in Oblivion/Skyrim)

Critical hit deaths that are par with Fallout.
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj125/Gizmojunk/FO_death_zpsotxhztvr.gif