LOL is now an English word

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:26 am

I can't see how you could use the acronym "lol" in an essay. I mean, in what context would it be applicable? Certainly not the essays I write. My lecturers would probably just fail you if you wrote down "lol".

"...and then Hitler decided it would be a good idea to attack Russia, lol."
User avatar
Amber Hubbard
 
Posts: 3537
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:59 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:17 pm

Newsflash: language changes over time.

Pretty much anyone who says that people are somehow ruining the English language through the introduction of new words should go back 100, 200, 300 years, and see if they could actually hold a conversation with someone who spoke English.


This.
User avatar
Far'ed K.G.h.m
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:03 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:28 am

I don't think there has ever been as many acronyms used in casual conversation as there is being used now.
User avatar
mike
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:51 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:05 pm

I don't think that the argument with words like "radar" and "sonar" are plausible. Those stand for realistic things (E.G. light amplification by stimulated emitted radiation), but think about what "lol" stands for. It means "laughing out loud". In any real conversation, that would be totally inane. It is saying that you are laughing out loud, but if so, than you have no need to say it. Across the internet, you can just say "that made me laugh" or "haha", considering now it is so banol that most of the time it is not said when you are actually laughing.
User avatar
scorpion972
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:20 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:51 am

No... But you can read an hundred and thirty year old news paper.

Well, you can with a dictionary, at least. I'm sure there are more than a few words in there that have been deprecated over time, and outside some timeless aphorisms that have remained with us they would probably be as indecipherable to us as "lol" would be for them. That's actually the point here: the OED now recognises "lol" as having significant enough use to warrant a definition, but that doesn't neccesarily make it a word in proper English usage - dictionaries merely record the changes in a language; they don't actually ratify them.

In any case, if someone were to write, "The man, clearly amused, gave out a mighty lol that shook the rafters," it should be possible to figure out the context regardless of the reader's epoch.

"...and then Hitler decided it would be a good idea to attack Russia, lol."

"And when Stalin saw the German army trapped at Stalingrad, he was all like 'lol, T34 ftw', and Field Marshal Paulus was all like 'wtf, T34 imba, qq...'" :P
User avatar
Campbell
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:54 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:10 pm

Newsflash: language changes over time.

Pretty much anyone who says that people are somehow ruining the English language through the introduction of new words should go back 100, 200, 300 years, and see if they could actually hold a conversation with someone who spoke English.

Okay, first of all LOL is an acronym not a word, why can't we actually laugh out loud instead of laughing. I don't care if language is "changing", Tell me which statement sounds better
"Oh, that is hilarious *laughs*"
"Oh, LOL"
And this isn't texting, this is having a real conversation.

And I probably could have a conversation with someone from way back when
User avatar
Lucy
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:55 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:25 am

Wow that's horrible, I still don't count it as a proper word or proper English.
User avatar
Matt Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:48 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:21 am

Oxford is kinda late on that.... but I guess its betterer laterer than neverer.

Most of the time I would consider that a true statement.

[] also, :stare:
User avatar
Victoria Bartel
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:20 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:40 am

Yup. I'm glad I'm not talking allowed.


Your knot?
User avatar
[ becca ]
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:59 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:48 am

Okay, first of all LOL is an acronym not a word, why can't we actually laugh out loud instead of laughing. I don't care if language is "changing", Tell me which statement sounds better
"Oh, that is hilarious *laughs*"
"Oh, LOL"
And this isn't texting, this is having a real conversation.

And I probably could have a conversation with someone from way back when

What does "sounds better" mean?



And you completely missed the mark on the second statement, I don't care if you can have a conversation, the point is that you'd notice significant differences in the usage of words and phrases.
User avatar
Naughty not Nice
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:14 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:26 am

Is that some kind of computer memory that works better when it catches on fire?

Hahahah acronym errors. Now that's one hypothetical nightmare. If everyone is using tons of acronyms you might make a mistake and have a completely different acronym there.
User avatar
Agnieszka Bak
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:20 pm

In any case, if someone were to write, "The man, clearly amused, gave out a mighty lol that shook the rafters," it should be possible to figure out the context regardless of the reader's epoch.

That's a very scary image of the future you've shown. :shocking:

I found these, and they seem pretty plain and easily understood.

http://www.jeanhounshellpeppers.com/Three_Hatfield_Gang_Killed.htm
http://jeanhounshellpeppers.com/Men_Athirst_For_Blood.htm
http://jeanhounshellpeppers.com/Assassination_of_Judge_John_Elliott.htm
User avatar
Alyna
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:54 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:53 pm

Your knot?

Sadly know.:(
User avatar
Eliza Potter
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:20 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:29 pm

That's a very scary image of the future you've shown. :shocking:

I found these, and they seem pretty plain and easily understood.

http://www.jeanhounshellpeppers.com/Three_Hatfield_Gang_Killed.htm
http://jeanhounshellpeppers.com/Men_Athirst_For_Blood.htm
http://jeanhounshellpeppers.com/Assassination_of_Judge_John_Elliott.htm

Newspaper articles are hardly known for their use of creative vernacular.

I draw your attention instead to Shakespeare as an example:

"Other words, like "pelican" and "willow" have lost the strong symbolic meaning that they had in Shakespeare's vocabulary. Most modern readers (myself included) would need a dictionary of mythology to understand that "pelicans" allegedly pecked open their mothers' briasts to feed. One doesn't need a translator to read Shakespeare, but some guidance in his word meanings might be useful."

http://www.acepilots.com/bard/ws_word.html

Need I also point out that he created http://www.nosweatshakespeare.com/resources/shakespeare-words.htm that we still use today? For no other purpose than to express something that before was inexpressable, or in reference to some common or popular notion. (Not that I'm saying the internet is anything like Shakespeare's wit...) :laugh:

Sadly know.:(

Stop it, your both driving me nuts! :P
User avatar
Nicole M
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:31 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:51 am

I thought it was hilarious when forums member Tyana Rie took the texture from the Vault 101 jumpsuit from Fallout 3 and turned it up side down and reapplied it....
It read "LOL".

lol.
User avatar
victoria johnstone
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:56 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:03 am

I've seen the acronym FTW on these forums a lot. I had to look it up, and apparently it means "For the win".
I always thought it meant "Forever Two Wheels" or "[Expletive] The World", and I knew that it couldn't mean that in the context that I was seeing it here.
"For the win" is a new one on me, as I only learned it within the last month or so. LOL ! FTW !

Meanwhile, we add new words to the dictionary and other ones become archaic; and a lot of people on forums have all but forgotten the correct usage of the semi-colon.
I'm wondering if the use of the semi-colon will become archaic? I do it myself.....instead of a semi-colon....I use dot dot dot dot dot.......
I'm beginning to ramble, but I actually used a semi-colon in this post. However, it seems that on forums, dot dot dot dot better expresses a pause in conversation better than a semi-colon, but please do not forget how to correctly use one in other written matter.....like literature.
User avatar
Batricia Alele
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:12 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:10 am

Considering the English language has declined and melted more into other languages and slang, this doesn't surprise me in the least.

Give it fifty years, the "proper" English speakers will sound like the guy from Joe Dirt, whom liked to see homos naked.
User avatar
Maria Garcia
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 6:59 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:54 pm

Considering the English language has declined and melted more into other languages and slang, this doesn't surprise me in the least.

Give it fifty years, the "proper" English speakers will sound like the guy from Joe Dirt, whom liked to see homos naked.

"Declined" "proper english"
These are subjective terms, and they aren't even new arguments, people have been saying the same things for quite literally centuries.

And "the guy from Joe Dirt, whom liked to see homos naked", uhhhh, what?
User avatar
Jessie
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:54 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:59 pm

Anyway, in all seriousness, I don't really have a problem with it becoming a "word". I don't have to use it. Although I would prefer that nobody use it. I've always considered people who do use LOL to be idiots. Not sure why. I just do. Same with npeople who don't capitalize or punctuate.

ditto

It's just some subconcious response, for me. I have no (concrete) clue why. :shrug:
User avatar
^_^
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 12:01 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:30 am

Okay, first of all LOL is an acronym not a word...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym#Comparing_a_few_examples_of_each_type

Meanwhile, we add new words to the dictionary and other ones become archaic; and a lot of people on forums have all but forgotten the correct usage of the semi-colon.
I'm wondering if the use of the semi-colon will become archaic? I do it myself.....instead of a semi-colon....I use dot dot dot dot dot.......
I'm beginning to ramble, but I actually used a semi-colon in this post. However, it seems that on forums, dot dot dot dot better expresses a pause in conversation better than a semi-colon, but please do not forget how to correctly use one in other written matter.....like literature.

You seem to use series of dots instead of commas in certain places as well.

Give it fifty years, the "proper" English speakers will sound like the guy from Joe Dirt, whom liked to see homos naked.

"...who liked to see homos naked."
User avatar
Talitha Kukk
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:14 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:50 am

dots are pauses, pauses are not grammatical breaks
User avatar
Kieren Thomson
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:28 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:02 am

You seem to use series of dots instead of commas in certain places as well.


I did it on purpose, and even exaggerated. Typically, it's usually only dot dot dot...and it seems acceptable on forums. I think you get the point.
User avatar
Lauren Graves
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:03 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:51 am

I did it on purpose, and even exaggerated. Typically, it's usually only dot dot dot...and it seems acceptable on forums. I think you get the point.

You wouldn't need dot dot dot there instead of anything because "and" is following. :P
User avatar
Sabrina Schwarz
 
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:02 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:01 am

I am much more particular when I set a form of antique hand set metal type in the use of letterpress printing, I assure you.
Forums are much more casual.
User avatar
james tait
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:26 pm

Previous

Return to Othor Games