Oh don't pull that crap. It was not deep or great or emotional at all because it failed at EVERY CHANCE to make it that.
I can't help it if you were too busy being distracted by the surrealism to notice the deep, compelling, and emotional story that was running throughout the film.
That's why it needed to be 2 desperate movies. One about a [censored] trying to escape her prison, and being constantly lorded over by a pimp. And another about mindless bullcrap shooting and killing.
No, there was no depth. Only a shallow illusion.
The two stories go very well together. The film did an exceptional job of showing a metaphor within a metaphor in the mind of a disturbed young woman who was being abused.
Edit: Its even more hilarious and destructive to your own argument that the movie had nearly all of It was just missing the nudity (and it had scantily clad women abounds).
Those things being present are not destructive to my point, unless you take the position that those things cannot coexist with a deep, compelling, and emotional story... which is a logical fallacy known as a false dilemma.
The film used surreal action sequences to represent how this young woman was coping with her combined mental problems as well as her abuse. It also used the whole brothel representation to further define how she was retreating into her imagination in order to cope with the pain she was going through. I don't expect the average movie-goer to see everything that is going on because the average movie-goer is going to be distracted by the violence, CGI, and "hot babes". As this is a film with layers, I suggest you watch it again and this time look for the story and I think that you will see that my anolysis is right on the money.