official plug-ins for morrowind

Post » Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:41 am

would the official plug-ins for morrowind (seige at firemoth, helm of tohan) are they cannon lore wise? if so is there any lore about firemoth or the helm?
User avatar
Cool Man Sam
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 1:19 pm

Post » Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:47 pm

Yes, they're official. The only lore pertaining to them that I'm aware of is contained in NPC dialogue and journal entries in the actual game.

It's mostly fluff, an excuse to insert some more action and enchanted items. Nothing that strongly affects the overall world lore.
User avatar
Chantel Hopkin
 
Posts: 3533
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:41 am

Post » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:17 am

Seeing as there is nothing that contradicts them, then I'd say they're good. If you started asking about certain Oblivion DLC, then there'd be something to argue over.

What gives with that stupid shrine anyway?
User avatar
Wayne W
 
Posts: 3482
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:28 am

Seeing as there is nothing that contradicts them, then I'd say they're good. If you started asking about certain Oblivion DLC, then there'd be something to argue over.

What gives with that stupid shrine anyway?

Are you talking about the Sithis statue?
User avatar
carly mcdonough
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 3:23 am

Post » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:13 am

Are you talking about the Sithis statue?

Indeed. The statue of the concept of nothing personified.

Did I miss the rationalisation of it somewhere along the way?
User avatar
Isabell Hoffmann
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:27 pm

Indeed. The statue of the concept of nothing personified.

Did I miss the rationalisation of it somewhere along the way?

I thought it was arguably a misinterpretation of Lorkhan.
Though the likelihood of me being incorrect is rather high.
User avatar
Guinevere Wood
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:06 pm

Post » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:23 am

Indeed. The statue of the concept of nothing personified.

Did I miss the rationalisation of it somewhere along the way?

It was probably knocked up by an intern on his lunch break.
User avatar
Baby K(:
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:07 pm

Post » Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:34 pm

Indeed. The statue of the concept of nothing personified.

Did I miss the rationalisation of it somewhere along the way?


Apparently Todd thinks that familiar fantasy tropes sell better than originality.
User avatar
Robert
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:35 pm

Indeed. The statue of the concept of nothing personified.

Did I miss the rationalisation of it somewhere along the way?


Sithis worshippers (not just the Dark Brotherhood) have rather literally made something out of nothing. There HAS to be some Daedra lord behind it, probably Mephala. That said, they think Sithis is real, so they create a statue of what they think he looks like. Nothing lore-breaking about that, really.
User avatar
Campbell
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:54 am

Post » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:00 pm

Sithis worshippers (not just the Dark Brotherhood) have rather literally made something out of nothing. There HAS to be some Daedra lord behind it, probably Mephala. That said, they think Sithis is real, so they create a statue of what they think he looks like. Nothing lore-breaking about that, really.


I remember that this was controversial from the beginning, though. It's a little questionable to give Sithis a body in the way other gods have.
User avatar
:)Colleenn
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:03 am

Post » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:01 am

Sithis worshippers (not just the Dark Brotherhood) have rather literally made something out of nothing. There HAS to be some Daedra lord behind it, probably Mephala. That said, they think Sithis is real, so they create a statue of what they think he looks like. Nothing lore-breaking about that, really.


I like to think that Mephala is behind everything to some degree or another, being the motivating force behind opposing sides in a war, the force behind its eventual peace, and then its subsequent dissolution. But I'm a bit of a Romantic that way I guess. However, that being said, I do agree with you, but that's just because I have a very Elven outlook on mythology (like a lot of people here).

Also, shrine blessings do not derive their power from the God they are consecrated towards (with the possible exception of Sheogorath's Altar in the Sacellum Arden Sul). They're very magickal objects that have been enchanted heavily.
User avatar
courtnay
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:49 pm

Post » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:35 pm

Apparently Todd thinks that familiar fantasy tropes sell better than originality.


He even said that himself.

That being said, I see nothing lore breaking about a Sithis statue, it's not like we actually SAW Sithis, a statue is just a statue, it doesn't necessarily represent what its subject actually looks like, or indeed, something that exists at all. The Dark Brotherhood already talk about Sithis as some sort of anthropomorphic personification of the void, so it doesn't seem too much of a stretch that some Sithis worshipers might have thought to take that idea further and model their own representation of Sithis, this doesn't mean Sithis actually looks like that, or has a form at all.

But all that aside, I'd imagine that unless it is contradicted somewhere else, or Bethesda officially says that it "never happened", we can assume that all content within the downloadable plugins for both Morrowind and Oblivion is, for all intents and purposes, canon, just as the games are.
User avatar
Ladymorphine
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 2:22 pm

Post » Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:13 am

It's not as bad as it looks folks. No need to break out the outright denial just yet. It is somewhat counter productive even as people who created the statue (be it the actual artist or the Crimson Scars) must have had some line of thought in creating a statue.

I'll preface this with an earlier explanation. It doesn't go very deep, but I'll try to clarify and elaborate on specific assertions on request.

Sithis has been worked on by several designers at different times. In Daggerfall Sithis was just another god, coincidently the patron of the Dark Brotherhood. Emil thought of Sithis as Dark version of God with matching virgin and child. MK though depicted Sithis as a fundamental force.

The connection between the two is a philosophy class gone wrong. Source of Chaos explains the relation. Now the Statue of Sithis gives good evidence to show that Sithis is embodied by Lorkhan. Which metaphysically speaking, has always been a given fact. In this case the connection with death works through the creation of Mundus, with Mundus Lorkhan brought mortality back to the Aurbis. Immortal gods could die again as they did before the dawn of time.

This also rationalizes the idea of Mephala as the Nightmother as only together with Lorkhan she can be the mother of Murder.


So it's possible to represent Death through Lorkhan. While Death does not imply half of everything in excistence as Sithis does, it does cover that which the Dark Brotherhood is worshipping. This means that conflict is not between Sithis, Sithis and Sithis but rather between the Cult of Lachance and the Cult of the Crimson Scars.

Lachance sees Death as a fundamental force and as such does not give it a physical representation. The Crimson Scars apparently have a more anthropomorphic vision and represent Death through Lorkhan. Both are valid visions, though it can be said that the Crimson Scars are more accurate.

So the only actual conflict here is between the believes of different cults dedicated to Murder. If only the cults of the Nine received this much attention..... <_<
User avatar
ashleigh bryden
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:43 am


Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion