PC Gamer Preview

Post » Sat Sep 25, 2010 2:46 am

Something I got on my twitter feed about half an hour ago. It's not terribly interesting (or very well written), but hey, it's something to read.

And despite the articles title, Deathclaws are only mentioned till the very end, and only very briefly: http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/09/25/fallout-new-vegas-preview-hunting-deathclaws/

The value of VATS and stealth is clear in Primm: pick someone off without being seen and it’s pretty much a free kill. After that, if the rest of your enemies are well armoured, you need to select the right weapon for the job, aim for unprotected areas or their own gun, and spend those action points wisely. You don’t want to end up like me, firing without VATS, getting overwhelmed and hiding up the stairs in a wrecked building, crouching around the corner, dodging dynamite when it came over edge of the broken wall. While Fallout’s inventory pauses the action when you dip into it to select a new weapon, it’s still clunky, ugly and based on the Pip Boy. I survived, but only on Stimpaks and cowardice.

Sadly the rollercoaster was broken and I died leaping off it. Restarting gave me the opportunity to take Buck elsewhere. I choose to head for Vegas. I’d never make it in the time, but that’s not a problem. Another Ganger attacked me. I backed off, watching him lunge at me, considering my options, when a voice called. Prospectors! Chomp Lewis and his friends couldn’t stand by and watch an innocent woman get beaten, so Chomp ran at the attacker with a sledgehammer and destroyed his head. The grisly scene was repeated. Another attacker I hadn’t spotted came over the hill, and died at Chomp’s hammer.

User avatar
john palmer
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:07 pm

Post » Sat Sep 25, 2010 12:00 am

Apart from the whining in the article, I found nothing particularly new.
User avatar
oliver klosoff
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 1:02 am

Post » Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:07 pm

new info or not its going on the mega thread
User avatar
Felix Walde
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:50 pm

Post » Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:55 pm

the one thing that he said that really bugged me was about looking forward to the next 34 hours - 34 - 34!!!

How about getting a reviewer that has actually played the game to completion

Maybe even more than once
User avatar
Pants
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:34 am

Post » Sat Sep 25, 2010 1:55 am

Ugh, that previewer was terrible. 35 hours? Are you serious? Go play Farmville or something.
Article left a bad taste in my mouth- not about the game, game sounds dope, but about the state of "video game journalism".
User avatar
Guinevere Wood
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:06 pm

Post » Sat Sep 25, 2010 4:13 am

At least we learned that the aesthetics of your equipment matter,
he used raiders clothing to be able to speak with other raiders.
Epic.
I can't wait to use an opposing factions clothing to sneak into their environments, or just simply commune with raiders.
User avatar
Rachell Katherine
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:21 pm

Post » Sat Sep 25, 2010 2:20 am

Ugh, that previewer was terrible. 35 hours? Are you serious? Go play Farmville or something.
Article left a bad taste in my mouth- not about the game, game sounds dope, but about the state of "video game journalism".

I'm sorry, I'm with you on this, but it is just too funny to pass up the concept of "you played a game 35 hours?! Get out now and go back to your casual gaming!"
The the good thing the interview told me personally was that geckos are adorable. As I had hoped.
User avatar
Kanaoka
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:24 pm

Post » Sat Sep 25, 2010 4:03 am

34 hours is reasonable for Fallout 3. You can finish every quest in the game in 20 hours if you know where it all is.
User avatar
keri seymour
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:09 am

Post » Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:52 am

What's this about 35 hours? I haven't read it yet...
User avatar
Lynne Hinton
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:24 am

Post » Sat Sep 25, 2010 7:55 am

Ugh, that previewer was terrible. 35 hours? Are you serious? Go play Farmville or something.
Article left a bad taste in my mouth- not about the game, game sounds dope, but about the state of "video game journalism".


Yeah, the way it's written just irks me. 35 hours is quite a bit of time to do stuff in the game though, so I don't think it's that heinous that he's only played it that much.

The the good thing the interview told me personally was that geckos are adorable. As I had hoped.


Yes, adorable Geckos are fantastic news. :)

What's this about 35 hours? I haven't read it yet...


The previewer says he played Fallout 3 for about 35 hours.
User avatar
yermom
 
Posts: 3323
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 12:56 pm


Return to Fallout: New Vegas