"They should do what Morrowind did"

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:53 pm

One thing I'd like to see return from morrowind is the alien landscapes and the dark festering swamps. the inhabitants with their odd culture and nearly incomprehensible religions. The biggest problem for me where Oblivion is concerned is the Church of the nine dominating the religious lives of the people.

There are ten races living in the province but only two religions were represented, and one of them was relegated to the wilds for safety's sake.

Also the place was too normal. I can get normal right here.
User avatar
Darrell Fawcett
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:38 am

Your gonna have to explain that a little more clearly, because I don't understand what you mean, if a cave has a name, an individual name, different from the other caves, how is it not then, something you can use for navigation.
...

Directions.

First grade: Cities and towns.
Second Grade: Landmarks, unique landscapes
Third grade: camps, caves.

Directions start with a first grade, then a second grade to a final third grade to be followable. I just wanted to point if there are many caves around and not enough unique landscapes, combined with lack of landmarks then directions would be telling a cave relative to another cave.

"The camp is due north from Maar Gan, but high ridges lie in the way. Follow Foyada Bani-Dad, a deep ravine just north of Maar Gan, northwest to the sea. A shipwreck at the seamouth of the ravine is a landmark. Swim east around the headland. Pass east through the ruins of Assurnabitashpi Shrine. Urshilaku Camp lies east of the ruins, inland in a low hollow."

Bani-Dad(this doesn't have a name on the map)
shipwreck(this doesn't even have a name!)

Do you think it is the names that help me find the camp here? :wink_smile: And even if Morrowind didn't have a map showing me the names like Assurnabitashpi, I would still be fine. The information is there inside the game. Map reflects this information, I never saw it as a cheat but I still rarely use it, it is more of a backup.

I like you are bringing real world topic. I am in the opinion that real world holding all the answers. The problem lies under two notions.

Information
Interactivity

The design in Morrowind is lacking in interactivity more than information. If it was interactive enough: these problems would exist? Does it make any sense to send someone to dangerous places with complex directions, in real life? The real life can be modeled and applied to game world, not exactly but for a better implementation. Like NPCs pointing the direction in realtime? Or shouting the bloody name of the NPC and he/she appears, "Jane Doe here. What's the problem?".

I just think Morrowind system was adding a layer of interactivity and information(detail) to the world. Taking it is taking interactivity and detail. And I like my games interactive and detailed. I want this layer back with more interactivity and detail. Suddenly being forced to *imagine* this aspect of the game makes me baffled.

When people say "they should do what X did", they don't mean improve on X, they mean do it like X, they might think there should be improved upon X, but nothing in "they should do what X did" can make you come to that conclusion. Discussing the differences are good, but people need to have a clear understanding about what X difference is, and why it is different, too often I find that people are muddying the waters and obfuscating everything. This just means half the debate is gonna be about what is what.

Besides, most people aren't interested in the reality of the situations, only arguing whatever argument that brings them closer to get their way.

It is hard for me to think people are against improvements. Not here. Just because they are Morrowind fans. No way. I know the immediate conclusion of "they should do what X did". But what they do mean is another thing. To find out, let's ask them! "Do you mean improve on X or do it exactly like X?"

It is like asking, "do you want a better game?". Off course they do.

I'm also not happy with the "muddy gray"(I had an anology in my previous post about "muddy gray" which I deleted later for a shorter post.) state of these conversations. For people to have a clear understanding, there needs to be discussions. We should take the risk and provide as much clearness as we can. I am trying. For example:

"They should do what Morrowind did."

A) Why? Where? How?
B) No, they shouldn't. You hypocrite, anti-progression, nostalgia goggle wearing Morrowind fans.
User avatar
lilmissparty
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:51 pm

Post » Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:36 am

Directions.

First grade: Cities and towns.
Second Grade: Landmarks, unique landscapes
Third grade: camps, caves.

Directions start with a first grade, then a second grade to a final third grade to be followable. I just wanted to point if there are many caves around and not enough unique landscapes, combined with lack of landmarks then directions would be telling a cave relative to another cave.

"The camp is due north from Maar Gan, but high ridges lie in the way. Follow Foyada Bani-Dad, a deep ravine just north of Maar Gan, northwest to the sea. A shipwreck at the seamouth of the ravine is a landmark. Swim east around the headland. Pass east through the ruins of Assurnabitashpi Shrine. Urshilaku Camp lies east of the ruins, inland in a low hollow."

Bani-Dad(this doesn't have a name on the map)
shipwreck(this doesn't even have a name!)

Do you think it is the names that help me find the camp here? :wink_smile: And even if Morrowind didn't have a map showing me the names like Assurnabitashpi, I would still be fine. The information is there inside the game. Map reflects this information, I never saw it as a cheat but I still rarely use it, it is more of a backup.


I understand what you mean now, I still see a problem with it, because unique landscapes is what "hills" was supposed to be in morrowind, and it was pretty clear that apparently the game had a very specific definition of what constituted a hill. You might find things through landscape, but I find that to be way to uncertain. When I navigated Morrowind, and things made sense, was when they used things that could not be either mistaken or misunderstood, like caves, shrines or mines. Because when you find said place, you will know without a doubt that you are on the right track, unless all second grade directions are as clear as a ship wreck, they just aren't reliable IMO. I would already have filtered deep ravine out of things to look for, because that is just too vague a term, when you are on an island with volcano full of deep ravines.

I like you are bringing real world topic. I am in the opinion that real world holding all the answers. The problem lies under two notions.

Information
Interactivity

The design in Morrowind is lacking in interactivity more than information. If it was interactive enough: these problems would exist? Does it make any sense to send someone to dangerous places with complex directions, in real life? The real life can be modeled and applied to game world, not exactly but for a better implementation. Like NPCs pointing the direction in realtime? Or shouting the bloody name of the NPC and he/she appears, "Jane Doe here. What's the problem?".

I just think Morrowind system was adding a layer of interactivity and information(detail) to the world. Taking it is taking interactivity and detail. And I like my games interactive and detailed. I want this layer back with more interactivity and detail. Suddenly being forced to *imagine* this aspect of the game makes me baffled.


It makes sense to send someone to dangerous places with complex directions, that's why I said it has roleplay value, but it doesn't make sense that someone would just make you rely on that alone, if you had a map, obviously the logical thing would be to convey that info onto the map which would provide an either clearer understanding of the path your supposed to take. If they are supposed to do this stuff I would rather have them do it right and give you a real map with real info, and no ability to see yourself on it, and a compass. The arrow is nothing but a representation of the compass, on real compasses you usually have a separate needle or arrow that you can turn, to make sure that you are going in a specific direction with specific number of degrees relative to the poles. This means that any time you get confused you can center the poles and you center your direction as well.

It is hard for me to think people are against improvements. Not here. Just because they are Morrowind fans. No way. I know the immediate conclusion of "they should do what X did". But what they do mean is another thing. To find out, let's ask them! "Do you mean improve on X or do it exactly like X?"

It is like asking, "do you want a better game?". Off course they do.


Improvement is subjective to everyone, everybody wants improvement, but not everything is considered an improvement. For example a lot of people already considers Morrowind an improvement, so saying "they should do what morrowind did" is already saying, "I want a better game". I want a better game, but doing what morrowind did, is most definitely not what will make it a better game, IMO.

To improve upon Morrowind is also to insinuate that Morrowind isn't perfect, which is taboo. That is why people emphasis on things being done like Morrowind instead of better than morrowind, it is more a tribute than a suggestion. Morrowind is a rolemodel, not a stepping stone, it is the ideal, not the sketch. It's even more than that, it's the realistic ideal, "just do it like morrowind, then I'll be fine", it's the compromise, it's enough.

Of course this is not true, but that doesn't stop it from being practiced. They shouldn't do what morrowind did, :whisper: because morrowind didn't do it right.

I'm also not happy with the "muddy gray"(I had an anology in my previous post about "muddy gray" which I deleted later for a shorter post.) state of these conversations. For people to have a clear understanding, there needs to be discussions. We should take the risk and provide as much clearness as we can. I am trying. For example:

"They should do what Morrowind did."

A) Why? Where? How?
B) No, they shouldn't. You hypocrite, anti-progression, nostalgia goggle wearing Morrowind fans.


I choose A), usually I just jump over A) though, and go to A2) because I've been down this road a million times, It's like watching a carefully constructed chain reaction, like domino blocks. The questions aren't real questions, because you know the answers, you just ask them to make the one answering them think about what he's saying instead of repeating what someone else said.
User avatar
how solid
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:27 am

Post » Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:47 am

I understand what you mean now, I still see a problem with it, because unique landscapes is what "hills" was supposed to be in morrowind, and it was pretty clear that apparently the game had a very specific definition of what constituted a hill. You might find things through landscape, but I find that to be way to uncertain. When I navigated Morrowind, and things made sense, was when they used things that could not be either mistaken or misunderstood, like caves, shrines or mines. Because when you find said place, you will know without a doubt that you are on the right track, unless all second grade directions are as clear as a ship wreck, they just aren't reliable IMO. I would already have filtered deep ravine out of things to look for, because that is just too vague a term, when you are on an island with volcano full of deep ravines.

My directions example above can be reduced to half. The ravines and hills, those are extra information, they supposed to narrow it down. I think I should include a special term for them outside of the first 3 grade. I just skip over these things and focus on clear landmarks. I guess they can be clearer.

It makes sense to send someone to dangerous places with complex directions, that's why I said it has roleplay value, but it doesn't make sense that someone would just make you rely on that alone, if you had a map, obviously the logical thing would be to convey that info onto the map which would provide an either clearer understanding of the path your supposed to take. If they are supposed to do this stuff I would rather have them do it right and give you a real map with real info, and no ability to see yourself on it, and a compass. The arrow is nothing but a representation of the compass, on real compasses you usually have a separate needle or arrow that you can turn, to make sure that you are going in a specific direction with specific number of degrees relative to the poles. This means that any time you get confused you can center the poles and you center your direction as well.

That's true about compasses but you don't need to turn anything. North is north. It doesn't matter to align them. And using degrees is a little overkill. Also I'm pretty sure I saw partial maps in Morrowind, in books or scrolls about regions. I also heard Skyrim will have partial maps.

Some quests, like fetch quests don't make sense to me. I don't know, exploring things on my own is nice but these quest should be about meeting people half way and work together. I would rather have *people* working for me to send over dangerous places. If they fail, I might say "If you want something done, do it yourself."

Improvement is subjective to everyone, everybody wants improvement, but not everything is considered an improvement. For example a lot of people already considers Morrowind an improvement, so saying "they should do what morrowind did" is already saying, "I want a better game". I want a better game, but doing what morrowind did, is most definitely not what will make it a better game, IMO.

To improve upon Morrowind is also to insinuate that Morrowind isn't perfect, which is taboo. That is why people emphasis on things being done like Morrowind instead of better than morrowind, it is more a tribute than a suggestion. Morrowind is a rolemodel, not a stepping stone, it is the ideal, not the sketch. It's even more than that, it's the realistic ideal, "just do it like morrowind, then I'll be fine", it's the compromise, it's enough.

Of course this is not true, but that doesn't stop it from being practiced. They shouldn't do what morrowind did, :whisper: because morrowind didn't do it right.


That's all Oblivion's fault. :P

For very few people, Oblivion is so badly flawed, Morrowind in comparison, is perfect. Upon further investigation, you can make them admit Morrowind being not perfect. Morrowind is so far away from perfect in reality, it took Oblivion and Skyrim to make some things right, and we will see about others.

I think majority realizes this. People were saying "better than Morrowind" prior to Oblivion, I'm sure. It is just normal that people are saying "like Morrowind" because Oblivon failed in some aspects for them, it is perfectly normal; no conspiracy.
User avatar
Scotties Hottie
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:40 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:48 pm

My directions example above can be reduced to half. The ravines and hills, those are extra information, they supposed to narrow it down. I think I should include a special term for them outside of the first 3 grade. I just skip over these things and focus on clear landmarks. I guess they can be clearer.


That's true about compasses but you don't need to turn anything. North is north. It doesn't matter to align them. And using degrees is a little overkill. Also I'm pretty sure I saw partial maps in Morrowind, in books or scrolls about regions. I also heard Skyrim will have partial maps.


Partial maps, do you mean in game paper maps? like the one at fort moonmoth (I think)? Anyways, I hear that Original Copies of Morrowind came with a large real paper map, showing everything from towns to regions, http://images.uesp.net//b/bb/MW-Map-Vvardenfell.jpg map. Seriously, I think this would have helped tremendously, I really wish this map was ingame.

Some quests, like fetch quests don't make sense to me. I don't know, exploring things on my own is nice but these quest should be about meeting people half way and work together. I would rather have *people* working for me to send over dangerous places. If they fail, I might say "If you want something done, do it yourself."


well I've heard some pretty amazing things are going to be in Skyrim, like quest givers accompanying you if you need a guide. Sounds too amazing, and it was a magazine, so the journalist might have gotten it wrong. But seriously, if the quest giver can come with you to show the way, or send a guide with you, that would solve everybody's problems.

That's all Oblivion's fault. :P

For very few people, Oblivion is so badly flawed, Morrowind in comparison, is perfect. Upon further investigation, you can make them admit Morrowind being not perfect. Morrowind is so far away from perfect in reality, it took Oblivion and Skyrim to make some things right, and we will see about others.

I think majority realizes this. People were saying "better than Morrowind" prior to Oblivion, I'm sure. It is just normal that people are saying "like Morrowind" because Oblivon failed in some aspects for them, it is perfectly normal; no conspiracy.


Yeah I know, I'm just annoyed you always have to fight your way to the truth. It's like you have to peel away all these shields because the only way you can show them you aren't trying to kill them is by them being exposed and you not striking them down. Of course then you find out that critiquing Morrowind might as well be the same as killing them.
User avatar
i grind hard
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:58 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:40 am

Also the place was too normal. I can get normal right here.

Hehe, I'm the exact opposite - I prefer normal. The reason I can never get into Morrowind in the same was as Oblivion is because it's too alien and barren for my taste.
User avatar
latrina
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:31 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:01 am

you really should have seen this coming lots of morrowind fans probably didnt like your first post and viewed it as a challenge for a debate
User avatar
Noraima Vega
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:28 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:08 pm

you really should have seen this coming lots of morrowind fans probably didnt like your first post and viewed it as a challenge for a debate

Believe me, we're always in for a debate. And we're damn good at it, too.
User avatar
Robert DeLarosa
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 3:43 pm

Previous

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion