I've never really seen the point of FLAC. Seriously, it's a bajillion times bigger than mp3, and I'm not quite sure my phone can even play FLAC files. Is the sound quality better or what? It can't really be noticable then, except for those kinds of people that seem to think that buying a stereo for $5000 is totally worth it because of the "awesome sound". For the love of God, just plug a headset to the computer already.
Speaking of FLAC however, a German 8,8 cm FlaK Flugabwehr-canon would be awesome. That's what I want in a collector's edition.
You're missing the point - mp3 is a lossy compression scheme, you get a significantly smaller filesize but you also lose information. FLAC is lossless, a perfect reproduction of the source material. You wouldn't ever put it on a portable media player, and the sound quality difference isn't really noticable on standard setups, but for storage and archival purposes you *never* use a lossy compression scheme, because you can do nothing to it without losing quality further. With a lossless encoding you can get as much quality as you want to put on your small portable devices, and there will never come a time when you wish it were higher quality. The filesize is a moot point, due to the cheapness and size of modern storage.
Basically, MP3 is fine for listening, but for storing something you want as much information as you can - and that's where lossless compression like FLAC comes in.