Would You Like To See Another Obsidian Spin-Off? : V - Skyrim

» Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:38 am

Exactly. Neither Oblivion or Fallout 3 gave me any motivation to play after the ending.

» Wed Oct 13, 2010 6:53 pm

I thought New Vegas was extremely overrated, but I found Alpha Protocol pretty enjoyable.

They should stick with making small, bioware-like rpgs because they got no clue about open-world rpgs. They are a really, really bad fit for Elder Scrolls.

» Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:49 am

No.

» Wed Oct 13, 2010 5:02 pm

Probably keep the game to Bethesda I don't doubt obsidan would make a great Medieval(Kind of medieval) RPG

» Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:00 am

This series is twice as old as Fallout

didn't the first TES come out 1994? First Fallout was 1997 right?

How is that twice as old.

» Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:25 pm

Personally, no. I would prefer TES to remain solely under BGS so that it will always retain that Elder Scrolls vibe.

To me New Vegas was much more linear in terms of exploration (although more choices were available in the story) because the mountains blocked off parts of the world. In fact, the actual playable size of New Vegas seemed like 1/2 of what is shown on the map.

» Wed Oct 13, 2010 5:41 am

No offense to obsidian,new vegas was good. I still think fallout 3 was better in some ways.But...i do not want obsidian to be invovled in the elder scrolls. I do not want spin off's.
The elder scrolls should stay in the hands of bethesda always. To me it's their main game,the diamond in the ring,their baby etc. In a nutshell.....NO!