What is misguided? Oblivion or Uesp?

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:13 am

For some reason, in UESP they call every Daedric higher being a prince..

I thought they were mostly made of up so called "Lords"

Like, in Oblivion the Azura followers call Azura a Lord

Also, in the book http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Oblivion:Modern_Heretics they say:

Azura:
"I personally have discovered one community worshiping the Daedra Lord Azura, Queen of Dawn and Dusk"

Malacath:
"The sword Volendrung is associated with Malacath, Lord of Monsters, and the eponymously named Mace of Molag Bal is also thought to be the object of Daedra worship. Other Daedra Lords, their shrines and worshipers, remain to be discovered in Cyrodiil by earnest and persistent researchers"


Though in the book http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Oblivion:Darkest_Darkness they make no mention of the lord/prince title of Daedra higher beings,
instead, they name Azura the "Goddess" of Dusk and Dawn, which is strange as Aedra are the only ones normally referred to as gods.. And they name Boethiah as the Father of Plots.

Another example of the "Lord" title if http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Oblivion:Hiding_with_the_Shadow which says
"The only known deity recognized by thieves is Nocturnal. Not truly a goddess, this Daedric lord is none-the-less a potent figure. She is the Mistress of Shadows, holding sway over secrets and stealth. She does not ask for worshippers, nor does she necessarily give blessings to those that do recognize her."


And another in Varieties of Daedra which says
There is little chance of our ever understanding the various orders of Daedra and their relationships to the Daedra Lords and their dominions



I mean, it seems to me that they may to be refferred to either for a certain Grammatical reason
for example

Lord
A titled Peer of the real -- Oblivion realms perhaps?
One with authorities over others -- Daedra?
Straight from the definitions books however "Lord is a title with various meanings. It can denote a prince or a feudal superior (especially a feudal tenant who holds directly from the king, i.e., a baron). ..."
This confuses me, if so technically shouldnt the daedra lords have power of princes?
Or is there no actual difference and is just a term used by certain individuals

Does Mehrunes dagon the "Prince" of destruction have any less power than the many lords among him? Although, Mythic Dawn members often refer to him as Lord Dagon.

Prince is a member of a royal family
If so, are the daedra lords related, and is Mehrunes Dagon just a kin of an even higher being?
User avatar
Nienna garcia
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:23 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:10 pm

The daedric princes are referred as princes, that is why they are called Daedric princes. Also, they have no gender, so Azura is still called a PRINCE. Lord can be used though.
User avatar
+++CAZZY
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:04 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:17 pm

The daedric princes are referred as princes, that is why they are called Daedric princes. Also, they have no gender, so Azura is still called a PRINCE. Lord can be used though.


Then why is it so many books and people refer to them as Lords?
I mean, really I have never experienced people calling them princes excluding dagon
I have never heard "Prince Sheogorath" or "Prince Azura"

Although they have no gender I think there is a certain distinction, as in the voices they are different

maybe though they are considered to not have genders as they have no sixual intercourse and make no kin
And that is truly what defines gender.
User avatar
Emily Jones
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:33 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:59 pm

"Prince" is, hmm, a title. "Lord" is generic word for high-ranked being. "Daedra Lord" also are horned guys with the axes, subordinates of Dagon in "Battlespire".
User avatar
Zualett
 
Posts: 3567
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:36 pm

Post » Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:43 am

Then why is it so many books and people refer to them as Lords?
I mean, really I have never experienced people calling them princes excluding dagon
I have never heard "Prince Sheogorath" or "Prince Azura"

Although they have no gender I think there is a certain distinction, as in the voices they are different

maybe though they are considered to not have genders as they have no sixual intercourse and make no kin
And that is truly what defines gender.


I'd imagine the whole prince aspect of it is a granted title, similar to lord, or god. They are higher beings that deal with metaphysical aspects of existence, each operating within a single sphere, which is an outward manifestation of their nature.

The Daedric Princes is the accepted and more common acknowledgment of their other-world and powerful existence. Lord can be a title demonstrated out of respect, or as a synonym for Prince. That said, not all people respect the Daedric Princes.

The term prince may also be a term used to equalize the sense of power and scope shared amongst the Daedric lords, as they all represent some aspect of change equally, though different. Though they rule different realms, though they all rule a realm. There is no king or queen of the Daedra that commands a higher authority than them.
User avatar
Quick draw II
 
Posts: 3301
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:11 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:25 pm

"Prince" is, hmm, a title. "Lord" is generic word for high-ranked being. "Daedra Lord" also are horned guys with the axes, subordinates of Dagon in "Battlespire".

This, Deagonx
User avatar
gemma king
 
Posts: 3523
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:11 pm

Post » Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:16 am

"Prince" is, hmm, a title. "Lord" is generic word for high-ranked being. "Daedra Lord" also are horned guys with the axes, subordinates of Dagon in "Battlespire".


Prince is almost always used as a connection to a bloodline... So, maybe these beings came to be by the very existence of their reign? Such as saying the existence of Creatures brought the Daedric Prince Malacath into creation
User avatar
Mike Plumley
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 10:45 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:20 pm

"Prince" is, hmm, a title. "Lord" is generic word for high-ranked being. "Daedra Lord" also are horned guys with the axes, subordinates of Dagon in "Battlespire".


That is also correct, and probably a far more reasonable assertion than mine.

Your last post though seems a little iffy. The Daedric Princes represent a sphere having to deal with change, and as a result, have continuously interfered in the dealings of the mortals present within the Mundus. Such meddling has resulted in changing the very nature of creatures, altering what they are into something that reflects the sphere that changed them.

Malacath was not created by creatures, rather his creation was brought about by the devouring of Trinimac by Boethia, who essentially crapped out after Trinimac was digested. As a result, all those who followed Trinimac became distorted and warped, which lead to the creation of the Orsimer.
User avatar
Reanan-Marie Olsen
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:12 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 1:54 pm

Prince is almost always used as a connection to a bloodline... So, maybe these beings came to be by the very existence of their reign? Such as saying the existence of Creatures brought the Daedric Prince Malacath into creation

It's a title! Lord can, and has, been used to also describe higher ranking lesser daedra, so using prince is a definite way to clarify what daedra you are talking about.

No bloodline.
They just are.
Also, many of the princes do not consider Malacath a daedric prince, as he wasn't a daedra at the start, he was turned into a daedric being later. He was the hero god, Trinimac, earlier.
User avatar
Fam Mughal
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 3:18 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:20 pm


Does Mehrunes dagon the "Prince" of destruction have any less power than the many lords among him? Although, Mythic Dawn members often refer to him as Lord Dagon.

Prince is a member of a royal family
If so, are the daedra lords related, and is Mehrunes Dagon just a kin of an even higher being?

1 a : monarch, king b : the ruler of a principality or state
2 : a male member of a royal family; especially : a son of the sovereign
3 : a nobleman of varying rank and status
4 : one likened to a prince; especially : a man of high rank or of high standing in his class or profession

User avatar
Dean Brown
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:17 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:31 pm

1 a : monarch, king b : the ruler of a principality or state
2 : a male member of a royal family; especially : a son of the sovereign
3 : a nobleman of varying rank and status
4 : one likened to a prince; especially : a man of high rank or of high standing in his class or profession




Though, back to saying the lords were the ones that are higher than princes

Mehrunes Dagon had to spend a lot of time and effort upon getting imself into the realm of Tamriel..
Namira however, entered without any spectacular need. (The Beggar Prince)

And why is it, it seems a demi-god Almalexia defeated Mehunres Dagon (Although the Nerevarine easily defeated her) in morrowind.
It took a true Aedra to defeat Mehrunes dagon in Oblivion.

Is this just because they need to add more quests in the storyline?
User avatar
Imy Davies
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:42 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:59 pm

demi-gods can die, gods can't. She was a god in her prime at that time, she lost that godness when the heart was gone. Also, times before were a lot more screwy back then.
User avatar
sally coker
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:51 pm

Post » Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:16 am

demi-gods can die, gods can't. She was a god in her prime at that time, she lost that godness when the heart was gone. Also, times before were a lot more screwy back then.


It seems to me Mehrunes Dagon has shown up on multiple occasions always to be defeated. Every time the way he does it is setup up riskfully..
its a bit obnoxious to see a daedric prince act so narrow mindedly
User avatar
Timara White
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:39 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 1:24 pm

Don't earlier games refer to them as princes?

Also, referring to an earlier post, is it more nearly accurate to say Daedra princes have no gender or that Daedra princes can choose their gender at will? Or maybe both are true in some way.
User avatar
Nana Samboy
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:29 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:07 pm

It seems to me Mehrunes Dagon has shown up on multiple occasions always to be defeated. Every time the way he does it is setup up riskfully..
its a bit obnoxious to see a daedric prince act so narrow mindedly


Lord Dagon is the Prince of Destruction, he wants to destroy, he suceeded partly before the Tribunal came and stopped him by banishing him back to Oblivion.
Lord Dagon is also the Prince of Natural Disasters, do Natural Disasters think before they destroy something? No, they just do it.

That is his personality, that is who Lord Dagon is.
User avatar
Katharine Newton
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:33 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:48 pm

Lord Dagon is the Prince of Destruction, he wants to destroy, he suceeded partly before the Tribunal came and stopped him by banishing him back to Oblivion.
Lord Dagon is also the Prince of Natural Disasters, do Natural Disasters think before they destroy something? No, they just do it.

That is his personality, that is who Lord Dagon is.

You mage it seem like mehrunes dagon is some crazed demon always trying to kill everyone.
User avatar
(G-yen)
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:10 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:33 pm

You mage it seem like mehrunes dagon is some crazed demon always trying to kill everyone.

Well he can't go back to being a kindly leaper demon till he blows up all the stuff he stole from previous kalpas.
User avatar
Josh Lozier
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:20 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:25 pm

It seems to me that the titles are interchangable, I've seen both usages before, and it seems like neither one is really inaccurate. Just don't go calling Azura a Daedric Princess, that would be inaccurate.

Lord Dagon is the Prince of Destruction, he wants to destroy, he suceeded partly before the Tribunal came and stopped him by banishing him back to Oblivion.
Lord Dagon is also the Prince of Natural Disasters, do Natural Disasters think before they destroy something? No, they just do it.

That is his personality, that is who Lord Dagon is.


That's true, if it were someone else, I'd say that he was an idiot, but in Mehrunes Dagon's case, it seems to fit his nature, besides, we can't exactly have him succeeding as it would be pretty hard to continue the Elder Scrolls series if everything got destroyed.
User avatar
Mr. Ray
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:08 am

Post » Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:26 am

I'm pretty sure it started out as "princes", and "lord" was used as to be less confusing with those who take on a female form (Azura, Namira, etc.)

You can use whatever title you so please, as long as you recognise the awesomeness of hircine. ;)
User avatar
Prue
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:27 am

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:01 pm

Don't earlier games refer to them as princes?

Also, referring to an earlier post, is it more nearly accurate to say Daedra princes have no gender or that Daedra princes can choose their gender at will? Or maybe both are true in some way.

The princes could change their form to anything they want. Boethia(h) is known to be male or female, depending on what (s)he wants to do. Their forms are pretty much stuck like that, because having it change radically every game would be confusing, and they should keep their form symbolic of their spheres for it'd be very weird if a prince, lets say Hircine, to look like Bugs Bunny instead of a hunter, or Peryite not looking like a mockery of Akatosh, or Vaemire not looking so nightmarish.
User avatar
Roddy
 
Posts: 3564
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:50 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:55 am

Hmmm, now that you mention it, the way I seem to recall the two names being used is that when referring to the multitudinous principalities of Oblivion in some way, then you use the title 'Prince'. For example, Princes of Oblivion, or Daedric Princes. But when you're referring to a specific Prince in context of THAT Prince, then you use 'Lord.' For example, Lord of Madness, Lord Sheogorath, Lord of Moonshadow. Note: Prince of Sphere and Lord of Sphere can be interchangeable depending on the context.

Hmmm. Interesting.
User avatar
GabiiE Liiziiouz
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 3:20 am

Post » Sun Oct 24, 2010 2:50 am

lets say Hircine, to look like Bugs Bunny instead of a hunter

:stare:
User avatar
Alisia Lisha
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:52 pm

Post » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:49 pm

:stare:

:hehe:
User avatar
Marion Geneste
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:21 pm


Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion