Is it just me, or are you EXTREMELY one-sided in your argument, and only want people commenting on how your idea is amazing and how tridents should be in Skyrim?
Well, I completely disagree. I'm not a big fan of polearms, but if Bethesda puts tridents instead of more classical polearms like halberds and spears, I will HURT someone. And why do you think that tridents were important in Viking culture? They were more commonly used in Rome and Greece until better polearms came into use-- like the aforementioned halberd. I have hardly heard about tridents in Viking culture-- in fact, not at all. I don't know where you got this information(Maybe I'm wrong, I don't know), but there's one last thing...
Nords are Nords, Vikings are Vikings... Sure, Nords are generally based off of Vikings, but why make Nords and their culture an "exact" copy of real-life civilizations? I actually DO NOT want Skyrim to be realistic in any way, as it should not be and as it is not shaping up to be. I am so far happy with what I've seen with Skyrim, and tridents would not be a welcome addition in my game.
I am sorry if this is at all offensive, but it seems like you came up with the first 3 reasons very quickly, just to provide some support for your argument while the whole point for your post was Reason #4. Again, no offense meant.
-Saber Spartan 8
Ok this may be a mouthful. 1- Duh the argument is one sided. This is my opinion i'm arguing, not yours. 2- You tell me that it is not realistic that vikings have tridents, but wait- THEN you say,"I actually DO NOT want Skyrim to be realistic in any way...". It would seem that you are helping me out with my twisted, one sided, bias argument (Maybe i'm wrong, I don't know).
ccccccccct. ooooh. Maybe I was a little bit to harsh quoting your own argument like that. Whatever.